• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于血液检测和生命体征预测心力衰竭患者在重症监护病房的死亡率。

Predicting ICU mortality in heart failure patients based on blood tests and vital signs.

作者信息

Wang Yeao, Rong Jianke, Wei Zhili, Bai Xiaoyu, Deng YunDan

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

The Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 25;12:1590367. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1590367. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1590367
PMID:40636830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12238217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, heart failure has become one of the major complications in the advanced stages of various cardiovascular diseases. Numerous predictive models have been developed to estimate the mortality rate of heart failure patients; however, these models often require the measurement of multiple indicators and the inclusion of various scoring systems. Critically ill patients are often unsuitable for extensive diagnostic tests, and many primary care hospitals lack comprehensive diagnostic equipment. In contrast, blood tests are not only simpler but also reflect the overall health status of the body. Therefore, using simpler methods to predict mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has become the focus of this study.

METHOD

A total of 5,383 cases from the eICU database were utilized for model development, while 530 cases from the MIMIC-IV database were employed for external testing. The patients were primarily diagnosed with heart failure, and the data included demographic information, blood oxygen saturation, white blood cells, red blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin, electrolytes, lactate, glucose, and other biochemical and physiological indicators collected during the ICU stay. Enhance the accuracy of data analysis and improve the universality of the model, all data underwent rigorous preprocessing prior to training, combined with data standardization. We utilized a variety of machine learning algorithms for modeling purposes, including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees, Random Forests, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), XGBoost, and Neural Networks. The performance of the model was assessed through cross-validation and evaluated using the F1-score.

CONCLUSION

Through feature selection, 15 key variables were ultimately identified. Among the nine machine learning models evaluated, the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) demonstrated the best overall performance. In predicting mortality (i.e., the deceased population), the MLP achieved an F1 score of 0.54, a recall of 0.71, and a precision of 0.44. The relatively high F1 score of the MLP highlights its potential clinical application value.

摘要

背景

目前,心力衰竭已成为各种心血管疾病晚期的主要并发症之一。已经开发了许多预测模型来估计心力衰竭患者的死亡率;然而,这些模型通常需要测量多个指标并纳入各种评分系统。危重症患者往往不适合进行广泛的诊断测试,而且许多基层医院缺乏全面的诊断设备。相比之下,血液检测不仅更简单,还能反映身体的整体健康状况。因此,使用更简单的方法预测重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率已成为本研究的重点。

方法

共使用了eICU数据库中的5383例病例进行模型开发,同时使用MIMIC-IV数据库中的530例病例进行外部测试。患者主要诊断为心力衰竭,数据包括人口统计学信息、血氧饱和度、白细胞、红细胞、血小板、血红蛋白、电解质、乳酸、葡萄糖以及在ICU住院期间收集的其他生化和生理指标。为提高数据分析的准确性并提高模型的通用性,所有数据在训练前都经过了严格的预处理,并结合了数据标准化。我们使用了多种机器学习算法进行建模,包括逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树、随机森林、梯度提升机(GBM)、XGBoost和神经网络。通过交叉验证评估模型的性能,并使用F1分数进行评价。

结论

通过特征选择,最终确定了15个关键变量。在评估的9种机器学习模型中,多层感知器(MLP)表现出最佳的整体性能。在预测死亡率(即死亡人群)方面,MLP的F1分数为0.54,召回率为0.71,精确率为0.44。MLP相对较高的F1分数突出了其潜在的临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/009791471c1c/fcvm-12-1590367-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/a7afc6e1a2e8/fcvm-12-1590367-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/075dc9ce71ea/fcvm-12-1590367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/a34e4c88a3d8/fcvm-12-1590367-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/1928fcf977dd/fcvm-12-1590367-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/009791471c1c/fcvm-12-1590367-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/a7afc6e1a2e8/fcvm-12-1590367-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/075dc9ce71ea/fcvm-12-1590367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/a34e4c88a3d8/fcvm-12-1590367-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/1928fcf977dd/fcvm-12-1590367-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c3/12238217/009791471c1c/fcvm-12-1590367-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting ICU mortality in heart failure patients based on blood tests and vital signs.基于血液检测和生命体征预测心力衰竭患者在重症监护病房的死亡率。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 25;12:1590367. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1590367. eCollection 2025.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Advanced Prediction of Heart Failure Risk in Elderly Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients Using Nine Machine Learning Models and Novel Composite Indices: Insights from NHANES 2003-2016.使用九种机器学习模型和新型复合指标对老年糖尿病和高血压患者心力衰竭风险的高级预测:来自2003 - 2016年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的见解
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf081.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Artificial Intelligence-Based prediction model for surgical site infection in metastatic spinal disease: a multicenter development and validation study.基于人工智能的转移性脊柱疾病手术部位感染预测模型:一项多中心开发与验证研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002806.
6
Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a cross-sectional study based on the NHANES database from 2009 to 2018.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)风险预测模型的构建与验证:基于2009年至2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库的横断面研究
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03776-w.
7
Construction and validation of HBV-ACLF bacterial infection diagnosis model based on machine learning.基于机器学习的HBV-ACLF细菌感染诊断模型的构建与验证
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11199-5.
8
Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for stroke-associated pneumonia in older adult hemorrhagic stroke.老年出血性卒中患者卒中相关性肺炎的基于机器学习的风险预测模型的开发与验证
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1591570. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1591570. eCollection 2025.
9
Prediction cardiovascular deterioration in a paediatric intensive care unit (PicEWS): a machine learning modelling study of routinely collected health-care data.儿科重症监护病房心血管恶化的预测(PicEWS):一项基于常规收集的医疗数据的机器学习建模研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 18;85:103255. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103255. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: Retrospective Study.基于机器学习的老年重症监护病房患者术后谵妄预测模型的开发:一项回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e67258. doi: 10.2196/67258.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary American and European Guidelines for Heart Failure Management: JACC: Heart Failure Guideline Comparison.当代美国和欧洲心力衰竭管理指南:JACC:心力衰竭指南比较。
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 May;12(5):810-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.02.020. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Prognostic Significance of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的预后意义
Can J Cardiol. 2023 Jul;39(7):971-980. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.04.011. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
Promises and challenges of machine learning for device therapy in heart failure.
机器学习在心力衰竭器械治疗中的前景与挑战
Eur Heart J. 2023 May 7;44(18):1583-1585. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad036.
4
Minimum heart rate and mortality after cardiac surgery: retrospective analysis of the Multi-parameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database.心脏手术后的最低心率与死亡率:对多参数智能监护重症监护数据库(MIMIC-III)的回顾性分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 14;13(1):2597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29703-9.
5
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
6
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
7
Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology.心力衰竭的全球负担:流行病学的全面更新综述
Cardiovasc Res. 2023 Jan 18;118(17):3272-3287. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013.
8
Minimum heart rate and mortality in critically ill myocardial infarction patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-III database.危重症心肌梗死患者的最低心率与死亡率:MIMIC-III数据库分析
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):496. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-992.
9
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.马修斯相关系数(MCC)在二分类评估中优于 F1 得分和准确率的优势。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
10
Temporal Trends and Patterns in Mortality After Incident Heart Failure: A Longitudinal Analysis of 86 000 Individuals.事件性心力衰竭后死亡率的时间趋势和模式:86000 个人的纵向分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;4(11):1102-1111. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3593.