• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互动思维对两人知觉决策中反应标准的影响。

Effect of interacting minds on response criterion in two person perceptual decision making.

作者信息

Kawachi Tatsuru, Kawachi Yousuke

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, 27‑1, Kawauchi, Aoba‑ku, Sendai, 9808576, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):24956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09850-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-09850-x
PMID:40640311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12246478/
Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that two-person judgments are more accurate than individual judgments in perceptual decision-making. Most studies have indicated that the improvement of performance accuracy reflects changes in visual sensitivity by using a bias-free paradigm to eliminate the effects of decision criteria. However, biases in judgment are natural during daily decision-making. Therefore, we should carefully consider the effect of response bias on two-person decision-making. Thus, this study investigated changes in two-person decision-making using signal detection theory. We conducted two experiments. The results of the two experiments revealed that not only does two-person judgment improve perceptual sensitivity but also shifts the decision criterion. This study provides new insights into response bias as a factor for better understanding two-person interactions.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在知觉决策中,两人判断比个人判断更准确。大多数研究表明,通过使用无偏差范式消除决策标准的影响,性能准确性的提高反映了视觉敏感性的变化。然而,在日常决策中,判断偏差是很自然的。因此,我们应该仔细考虑反应偏差对两人决策的影响。因此,本研究使用信号检测理论研究了两人决策的变化。我们进行了两个实验。这两个实验的结果表明,两人判断不仅提高了知觉敏感性,还改变了决策标准。本研究为反应偏差提供了新的见解,有助于更好地理解两人之间的互动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/910c4cd50bb4/41598_2025_9850_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/c3cdc5d21cb4/41598_2025_9850_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/0f81e068e295/41598_2025_9850_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/90f6ed7ba2c6/41598_2025_9850_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/910c4cd50bb4/41598_2025_9850_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/c3cdc5d21cb4/41598_2025_9850_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/0f81e068e295/41598_2025_9850_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/90f6ed7ba2c6/41598_2025_9850_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e27/12246478/910c4cd50bb4/41598_2025_9850_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of interacting minds on response criterion in two person perceptual decision making.互动思维对两人知觉决策中反应标准的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):24956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09850-x.
2
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
3
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
10
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-perceiving: Bringing the social into perception.共感知:将社会带入感知。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024 Sep-Oct;15(5):e1681. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1681. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Response uncertainty influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.反应不确定性影响持续反应任务中的反应偏差:信号检测理论视角。
Psychol Res. 2024 Feb;88(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01847-3. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Dyadic visual perceptual learning on orientation discrimination.双眼视觉感知在方向辨别上的训练。
Curr Biol. 2023 Jun 19;33(12):2407-2416.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.070. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
Response Bias Reflects Individual Differences in Sensory Encoding.反应偏差反映了个体在感觉编码上的差异。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;32(7):1157-1168. doi: 10.1177/0956797621994214. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
The forgotten history of signal detection theory.信号检测理论的遗忘历史。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Feb;46(2):201-233. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000732. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Making better decisions in groups.在群体中做出更好的决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170193. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170193. eCollection 2017 Aug.
7
Who's afraid of response bias?谁害怕反应偏差?
Neurosci Conscious. 2016 Jan;2016(1). doi: 10.1093/nc/niw001. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
8
The perceptual and social components of metacognition.元认知的感知和社会成分。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):949-65. doi: 10.1037/xge0000180. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Signal Detection Measures Cannot Distinguish Perceptual Biases from Response Biases.信号检测措施无法区分感知偏差和反应偏差。
Perception. 2015 Mar;44(3):289-300. doi: 10.1068/p7908.
10
Collective enumeration.集体枚举。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):338-47. doi: 10.1037/a0029717. Epub 2012 Aug 13.