Transabdominal pre-peritoneal hernia repair: risk of operation for recurrence depends on choice of both mesh and fixation device. A study from the Danish Hernia Database.

PURPOSE

Multiple methods of mesh fixation are available in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, as well as multiple types of mesh. No previous studies compare all methods of fixation in TAPP against each other in regards to risk of reoperation for recurrence. In addition, there is little data comparing types of mesh or the relationship between mesh and fixation method.

METHODS

We compare the tissue-penetrating methods with non-penetrative as well as no fixation, and examines the interaction of fixation method and choice of mesh. Cohort was established by way of the Danish Hernia Database, identifying patients operated with TAPP from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2022. Cox' regression analyses were performed, with multivariate analysis correcting for significant confounding variables, yielding adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for reoperation for each fixation method. Follow-up analyses investigated whether differences in mesh types significantly impacted the results.

RESULTS

Among 49,029 TAPP repairs, 3.6% experienced reoperation for recurrence over a mean follow-up of 5.76 years. Tack fixation, the most common method, showed the highest reoperation rates (5.3% at 5 years). Glue, self-fixating meshes, and no fixation, had significantly lower risk in comparison (aHRs of 0.25, 0.21, and 0.51, respectively). Even after correcting for weight and pore size, some mesh types significantly impacted risk, with aHRs spanning 0.28 - 1.

CONCLUSION

Non-penetrative fixation methods and no fixation are associated with lower reoperation rates compared to tissue-penetrative methods, with self-fixating meshes carrying the lowest risk. In addition, we found significant differences in aHR between types of mesh.