Suppr超能文献

监督住院医师行择期腹股沟和腹疝修补术后复发再次手术的风险。

Risk of Reoperation for Recurrence After Elective Primary Groin and Ventral Hernia Repair by Supervised Residents.

机构信息

Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2023 Apr 1;158(4):359-367. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.7502.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Surgical training involves letting residents operate under supervision. Since hernia repair is a common procedure worldwide, it is a frequent part of the surgical curriculum.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of reoperation for recurrence after elective primary groin and ventral hernia repair performed by supervised residents compared with that by specialists.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide register-based cohort study included data from January 2016 to September 2021. Patients were followed up until reoperation, emigration, death, or the end of the study period. The study used data from the Danish Inguinal and Ventral Hernia Databases linked with data from the Danish Patient Safety Authority's Online Register via surgeons' unique authorization ID. The cohort included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary elective hernia repairs performed by supervised residents or specialists for inguinal, femoral, epigastric, or umbilical hernias. Hernia repairs were divided into the following 4 groups: Lichtenstein groin, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) groin, open ventral, and laparoscopic ventral.

EXPOSURES

Hernia repairs performed by supervised residents vs specialists.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Reoperation for recurrence, analyzed separately for all 4 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 868 specialists and residents who performed 31 683 primary groin and 7777 primary ventral hernia repairs were included in this study. The median age of patients who underwent hernia repair was 60 years (IQR, 48-70 years), and 33 424 patients (84.7%) were male. There was no significant difference in the adjusted risk of reoperation after Lichtenstein groin hernia repair (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99-1.59), laparoscopic groin hernia repair (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40), open ventral hernia repair (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.61-1.29), and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 0.99-8.84) performed by supervised residents compared with those by specialists. There was, however, a slightly increased unadjusted, cumulative reoperation rate after Lichtenstein repairs performed by supervised residents compared with those by specialists (4.8% vs 4.2%; P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that neither open nor laparoscopic repair of groin and ventral hernias performed by supervised residents appeared to be associated with a higher risk of reoperation for recurrence compared with the operations performed by specialists. This indicates that residents may safely perform elective hernia repair when supervised as part of their training curriculum.

摘要

重要性

外科培训包括让住院医师在监督下进行手术。由于疝修补术在全球范围内较为常见,因此它是外科课程的常见内容。

目的

评估由监督住院医师进行的择期原发性腹股沟和腹侧疝修复术与由专家进行的修复术相比,再次手术治疗复发的风险。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究,纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月的数据。患者接受随访,直至再次手术、移民、死亡或研究结束。该研究使用了丹麦腹股沟和腹侧疝数据库的数据,这些数据通过外科医生的唯一授权 ID 与丹麦患者安全管理局的在线登记处的数据进行了链接。该队列纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上的患者,他们接受了由监督住院医师或专家进行的原发性择期疝修复术,用于治疗腹股沟、股疝、上腹部或脐疝。疝修复术分为以下 4 组:Lichtenstein 腹股沟、腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟、开放式腹侧和腹腔镜腹侧。

暴露

由监督住院医师进行的疝修复术与由专家进行的疝修复术。

主要结局和测量指标

分别对所有 4 组进行再次手术治疗复发的情况分析。

结果

本研究共纳入 868 名专家和住院医师,他们进行了 31683 例原发性腹股沟疝和 7777 例原发性腹侧疝修复术。接受疝修复术患者的中位年龄为 60 岁(IQR,48-70 岁),其中 33424 例(84.7%)为男性。Lichtenstein 腹股沟疝修复术(风险比[HR],1.26;95%CI,0.99-1.59)、腹腔镜腹股沟疝修复术(HR,1.01;95%CI,0.73-1.40)、开放式腹侧疝修复术(HR,0.89;95%CI,0.61-1.29)和腹腔镜腹侧疝修复术(HR,2.96;95%CI,0.99-8.84)由监督住院医师进行的手术与由专家进行的手术相比,再次手术的风险无显著差异。然而,与专家相比,监督住院医师进行的 Lichtenstein 修复术的未调整、累积再次手术率略高(4.8%比 4.2%;P=0.048)。

结论和相关性

本研究结果表明,与专家相比,由监督住院医师进行的腹股沟和腹侧疝的开放式或腹腔镜修复术似乎并未增加再次手术治疗复发的风险。这表明,当住院医师在监督下进行培训课程时,可以安全地进行择期疝修复术。

相似文献

3
Surgeon Volume and Risk of Reoperation after Laparoscopic Primary Ventral Hernia Repair: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Sep;233(3):346-356.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgeon Volume and Risk of Reoperation after Laparoscopic Primary Ventral Hernia Repair: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Sep;233(3):346-356.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Age-Related Risk Factors in Ventral Hernia Repairs: A Review and Call to Action.
J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:180-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Variation in training requirements within general surgery: comparison of 23 countries.
BJS Open. 2020 Jun 11;4(4):714-723. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50293. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Learning curve in open inguinal hernia repair: a quality improvement multicentre study about Lichtenstein technique.
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):651-659. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02064-x. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Predictors for recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair in 979 patients.
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):615-622. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.040. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
10
Gas off, room lights on: Shedding light on the surgical resident's experience in open and laparoscopic surgery.
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):460-468. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.042. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验