Snyder Sophia, Wesemann Dalton, Strusinska-Thayer Maja C, Jui Jonathan, Sahni Ritu, Giovanni Shewit P, Shaw Chris R, Daya Mohamud R, Lupton Joshua R
Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025 Jul 23:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2025.2522824.
Approximately one-half of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) are unwitnessed and have a very low survival rate. Our objective was to assess if use of a bystander estimated last-seen-alive (ELSA) time could predict a subset of unwitnessed OHCA patients with outcomes resembling those with witnessed OHCA.
This is a registry-based retrospective analysis of adults presenting with emergency medical services (EMS)-treated, non-traumatic OHCA from 2018 to 2023, in the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry. We excluded EMS-witnessed arrests, patients with do-not-resuscitate orders and records with incomplete data. Our primary outcome was survival with a favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge (Cerebral Performance Category score ≤2). We compared bystander witnessed arrests to unwitnessed arrests with ELSA times <5 min, 5-10 min, 10-15 min, ≥15 min, or unknown. ELSAs were abstracted from EMS charts using bystander estimates of when the patient was last seen, with values averaged if a range was given. We used multivariable mixed effects regression analysis to adjust for potential confounding variables. In the subset of patients where no-flow time (NFT) could be calculated, using the interval from estimated time of arrest (using ELSA and 9-1-1 call time) to initial EMS cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we performed propensity score matching by NFT and potential confounding variables.
There were 2067 bystander witnessed and 2755 unwitnessed patients meeting inclusion criteria. Patients with an unwitnessed arrest and an ELSA <5 min had similar adjusted favorable neurologic survival (absolute difference (95% confidence interval)) relative to witnessed arrests (-1.4%, (-6.9%, 4.2%)). Compared to witnessed arrests, neurologically favorable survival was significantly lower in unwitnessed arrests with ELSA 5-10 min (-5.3% (-9.5%, -1.2%)), 10-15 min (-6.8% ((-10.7%, -2.9%)), ≥15 min (-9.2% ((-12.7%, -5.7%))), or unknown (-5.2% ((-7.0%, -3.4%))). In our propensity matched group by NFT and covariates, there was no differences in favorable neurologic survival for unwitnessed arrests (11.4%) and bystander witnessed arrests (10.0%, = 0.785).
OHCA patients with unwitnessed arrests with an ELSA under 5 min or using ELSA to match by NFT displayed similar neurologically favorable survival as witnessed arrests. These findings suggest that the use of ELSA may help better characterize unwitnessed OHCAs.
约一半的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)为未被目击的情况,且生存率极低。我们的目的是评估使用旁观者估计的最后存活时间(ELSA)是否能预测一部分未被目击的OHCA患者,其结局类似于被目击的OHCA患者。
这是一项基于登记处的回顾性分析,研究对象为2018年至2023年在波特兰心脏骤停流行病学登记处接受紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗的非创伤性OHCA成年患者。我们排除了EMS目击的心脏骤停、有不进行心肺复苏医嘱的患者以及数据不完整的记录。我们的主要结局是出院时具有良好神经功能结局的存活(脑功能分类评分≤2)。我们将旁观者目击的心脏骤停与ELSA时间<5分钟、5 - 10分钟、10 - 15分钟、≥15分钟或未知的未被目击的心脏骤停进行比较。ELSA是从EMS图表中提取的,使用旁观者对患者最后一次被看到时间的估计,如果给出的是一个范围,则取平均值。我们使用多变量混合效应回归分析来调整潜在的混杂变量。在可以计算无血流时间(NFT)的患者亚组中,使用从估计的心脏骤停时间(使用ELSA和911呼叫时间)到初始EMS心肺复苏的间隔时间,我们通过NFT和潜在混杂变量进行倾向评分匹配。
有2067例旁观者目击和2755例未被目击的患者符合纳入标准。未被目击且ELSA<5分钟的患者与目击心脏骤停患者相比,调整后的良好神经功能存活情况相似(绝对差异(95%置信区间))(-1.4%,(-6.9%,4.2%))。与目击心脏骤停相比,ELSA为5 - 10分钟(-5.3%(-9.5%,-1.2%))、10 - 15分钟(-6.8%(-10.7%,-2.9%))、≥15分钟(-9.2%(-12.7%,-5.7%))或未知(-5.2%(-7.0%,-3.4%))的未被目击心脏骤停患者的神经功能良好存活率显著更低。在我们通过NFT和协变量进行倾向匹配的组中,未被目击心脏骤停患者(11.4%)和旁观者目击心脏骤停患者(10.0%,P = 0.785)的良好神经功能存活率没有差异。
未被目击且ELSA低于5分钟的OHCA患者,或使用ELSA通过NFT进行匹配的患者,其神经功能良好存活率与被目击心脏骤停患者相似。这些发现表明,使用ELSA可能有助于更好地描述未被目击的OHCA情况。