Hjelmskog Annika, Boyd Jennifer, Stevenson Amy, Pollack Roxana, Elsenbroich Corinna, Heppenstall Alison, Toney Jaime, Winterbottom Jo, Meier Petra
School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jul;9(7):101277. doi: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.06.001. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
This systematic review focuses on the effects of climate adaptation and mitigation actions in high-income countries on health inequality. The paper reviews existing evidence (158 studies) on the potential of climate actions to narrow or widen health inequalities and identifies mechanisms via which these effects could occur. The extent of the evidence is highly variable and spread across multiple scientific disciplines. In some domains of climate action (such as greener transport and blue and green infrastructure) the evidence on effects on health inequality for different population groups is well developed. In other domains (such as marine conservation and biodiversity), key evidence gaps were identified. Considerable variation exists in the level of detail explaining different mechanisms. Both positive and negative effects on health inequality were found to be possible, suggesting the importance of this research area in supporting climate justice. A more coherent, interdisciplinary approach would enable robust conclusions regarding the effect of specific interventions.
本系统综述聚焦于高收入国家的气候适应与减缓行动对健康不平等的影响。该论文回顾了现有证据(158项研究),探讨气候行动缩小或扩大健康不平等的潜力,并确定这些影响可能产生的机制。证据的范围差异很大,涵盖多个科学学科。在某些气候行动领域(如更绿色的交通以及蓝色和绿色基础设施),关于对不同人群健康不平等影响的证据较为充分。在其他领域(如海洋保护和生物多样性),则发现了关键的证据空白。在解释不同机制的详细程度上存在相当大的差异。研究发现,对健康不平等既有积极影响也有消极影响,这表明该研究领域在支持气候正义方面的重要性。采用更连贯的跨学科方法将有助于就特定干预措施的效果得出有力结论。