Schultz M E, Corl B A, Payne K M, Stewart S, Thomason W E, Ferreira G
School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech, Blackstone, VA 23824.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Sep;108(9):9651-9661. doi: 10.3168/jds.2025-26629. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
This study aimed to evaluate the production performance, the milk fatty acid profile, and the nutrient digestibility of high-producing dairy cows fed high-forage (HF) or low-forage (LF) diets containing triticale silages harvested at either the boot stage (BT) or the soft-dough stage (SFT) of maturity. A 10-ha field was seeded with 105 kg/ha of triticale. Half of the field was harvested at BT and the other half at SFT. The harvested forage was ensiled in separate concrete-walled bunker silos for at least 60 d. The BT silage had 97.0% OM, 9.6% CP, 61.0% NDF, 42.0% ADF, 8.9% ADL, and 1.6% starch, whereas the SFT silage had 97.3% OM, 8.3% CP, 63.0% NDF, 44.0% ADF, 10.2% ADL, and 3.7% starch. The similar nutritional compositions of the 2 silages might be related to splitting the field in 2 halves that reflected differences in growing conditions of the crop. The animal study involved 8 primiparous (584 ± 21 kg BW and 105 ± 11 DIM) and 16 multiparous (710 ± 57 kg BW and 105 ± 18 DIM) Holstein cows. The experiment was a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 21-d periods, with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. The HF diets were formulated to contain 55% dietary forage, and the LF diets were formulated to contain 38% dietary forage. Cows were housed in a freestall barn and fed once daily. Cows fed BT and SFT diets had similar DMI, but cows fed LF diets had higher DMI than cows fed HF diets. Feeding BT diets resulted in more milk production (43.5 vs. 42.4 kg/d) and higher milk protein (1.30 vs. 1.23 kg/d) and lactose yields (2.13 vs. 2.04 kg/d) compared with feeding SFT diets. Energy-corrected milk yield did not differ between BT and SFT diets. Cows fed HF diets produced less milk (41.1 vs. 43.0 kg/d) but tended to increase milk fat concentration (4.56% vs. 4.37%) compared with cows fed LF diets. Milk protein concentration was similar between cows fed HF and LF diets, but cows fed HF diets increased lactose concentration (5.02% vs. 4.80%). Triticale maturity did not affect NDF digestibility, but LF diets improved NDF digestibility (45.2 vs. 41.7%). No difference existed in de novo fatty acids between cows fed the BT and SFT diets despite the higher concentrations of CLA trans-10, cis-12 fatty acid and slightly higher concentrations of C18:1 trans-10 fatty acid. Under the conditions of this study, production performance did not appear to be sensitive to diets with triticale silage harvested at different maturity stages, and this occurred with both HF and LF diets.
本研究旨在评估饲喂含处于孕穗期(BT)或蜡熟期(SFT)收获的小黑麦青贮饲料的高饲草(HF)或低饲草(LF)日粮的高产奶牛的生产性能、乳脂肪酸谱和养分消化率。一块10公顷的田地播种了每公顷105千克的小黑麦。田地的一半在BT期收获,另一半在SFT期收获。收获的饲草分别青贮在单独的混凝土墙青贮窖中至少60天。BT青贮饲料含有97.0%的有机物、9.6%的粗蛋白、61.0%的中性洗涤纤维、42.0%的酸性洗涤纤维、8.9%的酸性洗涤木质素和1.6%的淀粉,而SFT青贮饲料含有9,7.3%的有机物、8.3%的粗蛋白、63.0%的中性洗涤纤维、44.0%的酸性洗涤纤维、10.2%的酸性洗涤木质素和3.7%的淀粉。这两种青贮饲料相似的营养成分可能与将田地分成两半有关,这反映了作物生长条件的差异。动物研究涉及8头初产(体重584±21千克,产犊天数105±11天)和16头经产(体重710±57千克,产犊天数105±18天)的荷斯坦奶牛。试验采用重复的4×4拉丁方设计,每期21天,采用2×2析因处理安排。HF日粮配制为含有55%的日粮饲草,LF日粮配制为含有38%的日粮饲草。奶牛饲养在散栏牛舍,每天饲喂一次。饲喂BT和SFT日粮的奶牛干物质采食量相似,但饲喂LF日粮的奶牛干物质采食量高于饲喂HF日粮的奶牛。与饲喂SFT日粮相比