Fleury Kelly L, Troup Lucy, Mangan Andrew, Kinsella Rita, Duque Gustavo, Knowles Bethany, Davey Catherine, Haines Kimberley J, Said Catherine M
Department of Physiotherapy, Western Health, St. Albans, Australia.
Department of Surgery, Faculty Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06161-8.
Older patients who are non-weightbearing/touch-weightbearing (NWB/TWB) following a lower limb fracture often receive limited physiotherapy until this restriction is removed. It is unknown whether interventions such as higher frequency exercise or Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) effectively maintain quadriceps strength and patient function. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to evaluate the feasibility of delivering two alternative interventions and obtaining selected outcome measures.
Twenty-four people with a lower limb fracture and NWB/TWB restriction were recruited on admission to a subacute ward at Western Health (a major metropolitan public health service in Melbourne). Participants were randomly allocated to receive either low frequency physiotherapy (n = 8), high frequency physiotherapy (n = 8) or NMES (n = 8). Interventions were delivered during the NWB/TWB phase. The primary outcomes were trial feasibility and safety; determined by adverse events. Quadriceps strength (assessed using a dynamometer), and function were measured at baseline, completion of NWB/TWB restriction, and on hospital discharge.
Recruitment was paused twice due to the COVID-19 pandemic: 145 people were screened; 43 eligible and 24 recruited. Retention rate was high, with only two participants withdrawing due to acute medical reasons. Twenty-one out of 24 participants successfully completed their intervention sessions, with 91% of scheduled sessions delivered. Outcome measurement completion was 100% at baseline, 83% at completion of NWB/TWB restriction, and 83% on hospital discharge. While the study was not powered to determine effectiveness, the high frequency and NMES groups demonstrated higher ratios of quadriceps strength (affected / unaffected limb); compared to the low frequency group at discharge.
The trial protocol was feasible and safe. Results indicate there is a potential for high frequency exercise or NMES to be more effective at maintaining muscle strength compared to low frequency exercise. A fully powered randomised controlled trial to explore the effectiveness and cost of these interventions is warranted.
下肢骨折后非负重/触地负重(NWB/TWB)的老年患者在这种限制解除之前,通常接受的物理治疗有限。尚不清楚诸如高频运动或神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)等干预措施是否能有效维持股四头肌力量和患者功能。这项试点试验的主要目的是评估实施两种替代干预措施并获得选定结果指标的可行性。
24名下肢骨折且有NWB/TWB限制的患者在入住西部健康中心(墨尔本一家主要的大都市公共卫生服务机构)的亚急性病房时被招募。参与者被随机分配接受低频物理治疗(n = 8)、高频物理治疗(n = 8)或NMES(n = 8)。干预措施在NWB/TWB阶段实施。主要结果是试验的可行性和安全性;由不良事件确定。在基线、NWB/TWB限制结束时和出院时测量股四头肌力量(使用测力计评估)和功能。
由于COVID-19大流行,招募工作暂停了两次:共筛查了145人;43人符合条件,24人被招募。保留率很高,只有两名参与者因急性医疗原因退出。24名参与者中有21名成功完成了干预课程,完成了91%的预定课程。结果测量的完成率在基线时为100%,NWB/TWB限制结束时为83%,出院时为83%。虽然该研究没有足够的能力来确定有效性,但高频和NMES组在出院时股四头肌力量(患侧/未患侧肢体)的比率高于低频组。
试验方案是可行且安全的。结果表明,与低频运动相比,高频运动或NMES在维持肌肉力量方面可能更有效。有必要进行一项充分有力的随机对照试验,以探索这些干预措施的有效性和成本。