Lai Heidi T M, Ryder Nathan A, Tintle Nathan L, Jackson Kristina H, Kris-Etherton Penny M, Harris William S
Fatty Acid Research Institute, Sioux Falls, SD 57106, USA.
OmegaQuant Analytics, Sioux Falls, SD 57106, USA.
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 22;17(13):2076. doi: 10.3390/nu17132076.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Chronic inflammation is recognized as an important risk factor for a variety of health disorders. Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (-6 PUFAs), particularly linoleic (LA) and arachidonic acid (AA), have been shown to be either pro- or anti-inflammatory, and researchers have advocated both for and against reducing their dietary intake. This study sought to correlate the levels of ten inflammation-related biomarkers across multiple pathways with red blood cell (RBC) membrane levels of the major dietary and circulating -6 PUFAs.
We included 2777 participants (mean age: 66 ± 9 years, 54% women, 9.8% minorities) from the Framingham Offspring and minority-enriched Omni cohorts, and calculated partial correlation coefficients.
After multivariable adjustment, RBC LA was inversely correlated (all ≤ 0.05) with five markers of inflammation, receptors, or pathways: -reactive protein ( = -0.06); soluble interleukin-6 ( = -0.15); intercellular adhesion molecule-1 ( = -0.09); monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 ( = -0.07); and P-selectin ( = -0.07). RBC AA was inversely correlated (all ≤ 0.05) with soluble interleukin-6 ( = -0.10); intercellular adhesion molecule-1 ( = -0.14); monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and ( = -0.06); and osteoprotegerin ( = -0.07). Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase-A2 mass and activity, urinary isoprostanes, and tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 were not significantly correlated with LA or AA.
In our large community-based study, we observed weak but statistically significant inverse associations between several types of inflammatory biomarkers with RBC -6 PUFAs. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that omega-6 fatty acids are pro-inflammatory.
背景/目的:慢性炎症被认为是多种健康问题的重要风险因素。ω-6多不饱和脂肪酸(-6 PUFAs),尤其是亚油酸(LA)和花生四烯酸(AA),已被证明具有促炎或抗炎作用,研究人员对此主张减少或不减少其膳食摄入量。本研究旨在将多种途径中十种炎症相关生物标志物的水平与主要膳食和循环-6 PUFAs的红细胞(RBC)膜水平相关联。
我们纳入了来自弗雷明汉后代队列和少数族裔富集的Omni队列的2777名参与者(平均年龄:66±9岁,54%为女性,9.8%为少数族裔),并计算了偏相关系数。
经过多变量调整后,RBC LA与五种炎症、受体或途径标志物呈负相关(所有P≤0.05):C反应蛋白(P = -0.06);可溶性白细胞介素-6(P = -0.15);细胞间黏附分子-1(P = -0.09);单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(P = -0.07);以及P-选择素(P = -0.07)。RBC AA与可溶性白细胞介素-6(P = -0.10);细胞间黏附分子-1(P = -0.14);单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(P = -0.06);以及骨保护素(P = -0.07)呈负相关。脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2质量和活性、尿异前列腺素和肿瘤坏死因子受体-2与LA或AA无显著相关性。
在我们基于社区的大型研究中,我们观察到几种类型的炎症生物标志物与RBC -6 PUFAs之间存在微弱但具有统计学意义的负相关。我们的研究结果不支持ω-6脂肪酸具有促炎作用的假设。