Vittori Arianna, Latorre-Rodríguez Andrés R, Keogan Andrew, Huang Jasmine, Schaheen Lara, Bremner Ross M, Mittal Sumeet K
Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA.
Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 27;14(13):4577. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134577.
: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is widely used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Iatrogenic gastroesophageal injuries, when recognized intraoperatively, can be managed without major consequences, whereas undetected injuries presenting as postoperative leaks are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite their complexity, research on post-LARS leaks is scant. We aim to describe the diagnosis and management of such injuries at a tertiary referral center. : We describe a single-center case series of patients referred for gastroesophageal perforations after LARS. Patients were identified through the personal records of surgeons at our institution. A narrative literature review was conducted to summarize publications on the topic. : Five patients (four female [80%]; median age, 73 years [IQR, 67-74]) were included. The median time between LARS and clinical presentation was 2 (IQR, 1-8) days (range 1-15 days). The most frequent symptoms were shortness of breath (all five patients) and pain (three [60%] patients). All patients presented with hypoxia, and four (80%) patients presented with sepsis. Two (40%) patients underwent primary repair, and three (60%) required limited esophagogastrectomy without immediate reconstruction. All patients required both thoracic and abdominal exploration, and all of them experienced significant postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3). The median hospital stay was 58 days (IQR, 34-59). At a median follow-up of 14 months (IQR, 6-28), all patients were alive. : Although infrequent, gastroesophageal perforation after LARS often requires complex surgical interventions and prolonged hospital stays. Additional efforts should focus on prevention and early recognition.
腹腔镜抗反流手术(LARS)被广泛用于治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)。医源性胃食管损伤若在术中被识别,可得到处理且不会产生严重后果,而未被发现的损伤表现为术后漏则与高发病率和死亡率相关。尽管其情况复杂,但关于LARS术后漏的研究却很少。我们旨在描述在一家三级转诊中心对此类损伤的诊断和处理。
我们描述了一组在LARS后因胃食管穿孔前来就诊的单中心病例系列。通过我们机构外科医生的个人记录来确定患者。进行了叙述性文献综述以总结关于该主题的出版物。
纳入了5例患者(4例女性[80%];中位年龄73岁[四分位间距,67 - 74岁])。LARS与临床表现之间的中位时间为2天(四分位间距,1 - 8天)(范围1 - 15天)。最常见的症状是呼吸急促(所有5例患者)和疼痛(3例[60%]患者)。所有患者均出现低氧血症,4例(80%)患者出现脓毒症。2例(40%)患者接受了一期修复,3例(60%)需要进行有限的食管胃切除术且不立即重建。所有患者均需要进行胸腹部探查,并且他们都经历了严重的术后并发症(Clavien - Dindo≥3级)。中位住院时间为58天(四分位间距,34 - 59天)。在中位随访14个月(四分位间距,6 - 28个月)时,所有患者均存活。
尽管不常见,但LARS术后胃食管穿孔通常需要复杂手术干预和延长住院时间。应加大力度进行预防和早期识别。