Artosi Fabio, Cosio Terenzio, Diluvio Laura, Costanza Gaetana, Coniglione Filadelfo, Iacovantuono Maria, Matteini Enrico, Kaya Elif Çağla, Lambiase Sara, Bianchi Luca, Campione Elena
Dermatology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Laboratory Sciences and Haematological Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 27;14(13):4580. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134580.
: Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare form of small-vessel vasculitis characterized by persistent urticarial lesions and systemic manifestations. It differs from chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) both clinically and pathogenetically, often requiring systemic therapy. Despite its complexity, no standardized treatment algorithm exists. : We conducted a retrospective, monocentric, observational study on 11 patients diagnosed with UV at the Dermatology Unit of Tor Vergata University Hospital (Rome) between 2014 and 2024. Demographic, clinical, serological, and therapeutic data were collected from medical records. The therapeutic response was assessed using the Urticaria Control Test (UCT) score. : The cohort comprised predominantly women (91%), with a mean age at diagnosis of 52.8 years. Autoimmune thyroiditis was the most frequent comorbidity (64%). Hypocomplementemia was detected in only one patient (9%), who also had systemic lupus erythematosus. Antihistamines, while usually prescribed, showed limited efficacy since none of the patients achieved complete remission with monotherapy. Systemic corticosteroids demonstrated rapid and effective control in acute phases. Omalizumab produced variable responses, with two patients achieving a high response (HR) and one reaching complete remission (CR). Methotrexate and cyclosporine yielded inconsistent outcomes. Due to the heterogeneity and limited sample size, statistical analyses were not performed. : UV presents with diverse clinical profiles and therapeutic responses. No treatment proved universally efficacious, but corticosteroids and omalizumab were effective in an acute and maintenance phase, respectively. Our findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment plans and the need for further studies to define predictive biomarkers and therapeutic strategies in UV.
荨麻疹性血管炎(UV)是一种罕见的小血管血管炎,其特征为持续性荨麻疹皮损和全身表现。它在临床和发病机制上均与慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)不同,通常需要进行全身治疗。尽管其情况复杂,但尚无标准化的治疗方案。
我们对2014年至2024年间在罗马托韦尔加塔大学医院皮肤科确诊为UV的11例患者进行了一项回顾性、单中心观察性研究。从病历中收集了人口统计学、临床、血清学和治疗数据。使用荨麻疹控制试验(UCT)评分评估治疗反应。
该队列主要为女性(91%),诊断时的平均年龄为52.8岁。自身免疫性甲状腺炎是最常见的合并症(64%)。仅1例患者(9%)检测到低补体血症,该患者还患有系统性红斑狼疮。抗组胺药虽然通常会开具,但疗效有限,因为没有患者通过单一疗法实现完全缓解。全身用糖皮质激素在急性期显示出快速有效的控制效果。奥马珠单抗产生了不同的反应,2例患者获得高反应(HR),1例达到完全缓解(CR)。甲氨蝶呤和环孢素的疗效不一致。由于异质性和样本量有限,未进行统计分析。
UV呈现出多样的临床特征和治疗反应。没有一种治疗方法被证明普遍有效,但糖皮质激素和奥马珠单抗分别在急性期和维持期有效。我们的研究结果强调了个体化治疗方案的重要性,以及进一步研究以确定UV预测生物标志物和治疗策略的必要性。