Lin Shih-Syuan, Wu Zhi-Fu, Lai Hou-Chuan, Ko Ching-Lung, Sun Ting-Yi, Hong Kun-Ting, Lo Kai-Li, Yeh Tzu-Hsuan, Tseng Wei-Cheng
Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4669. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134669.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is often performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) using a combination of propofol and remifentanil. However, the effects of different remifentanil effect-site concentrations (Ce) combined with propofol on perioperative outcomes in this procedure have not been reported. In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 80 patients scheduled for single-level PVP under MAC were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive propofol (Ce: 2.0 mcg/mL) combined with either a low (1.0 ng/mL; Group 1) or high (2.0 ng/mL; Group 2) remifentanil Ce. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative patient movement; secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability, perioperative adverse events, anesthetic consumption, frequency of dose adjustments, postoperative recovery, and anesthesia satisfaction. Group 2 exhibited significantly fewer episodes of patient movement during the procedure and better intraoperative hemodynamic stability. Additionally, fewer upward adjustments in remifentanil infusion were observed in Group 2. Although the total propofol consumption was similar between the groups, Group 2 required a significantly lower propofol Ce to achieve adequate sedation. Surgeon satisfaction with anesthesia was also significantly higher in Group 2. Using a higher remifentanil Ce (2.0 ng/mL) in combination with propofol during PVP under MAC reduces patient movement and improves intraoperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse events. This regimen may thereby enhance procedural efficiency and surgeon satisfaction during vertebral interventions.
经皮椎体成形术(PVP)通常在监护麻醉(MAC)下进行,使用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼联合给药。然而,不同瑞芬太尼效应室浓度(Ce)联合丙泊酚对该手术围手术期结局的影响尚未见报道。在这项前瞻性随机对照研究中,纳入了80例计划在MAC下进行单节段PVP的患者。参与者被随机分配接受丙泊酚(Ce:2.0 mcg/mL)联合低剂量(1.0 ng/mL;第1组)或高剂量(2.0 ng/mL;第2组)瑞芬太尼Ce。主要结局是术中患者体动发生率;次要结局包括血流动力学稳定性、围手术期不良事件、麻醉药物用量、剂量调整频率、术后恢复情况以及麻醉满意度。第2组在手术过程中患者体动发作明显较少,术中血流动力学稳定性更好。此外,第2组观察到瑞芬太尼输注向上调整的情况较少。尽管两组之间丙泊酚总用量相似,但第2组达到充分镇静所需的丙泊酚Ce显著更低。第2组外科医生对麻醉的满意度也显著更高。在MAC下进行PVP时,使用较高的瑞芬太尼Ce(2.0 ng/mL)联合丙泊酚可减少患者体动,改善术中血流动力学稳定性,且不增加不良事件。因此,这种方案可能会提高椎体干预过程中的手术效率和外科医生满意度。