Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注用于非医院牙科诊疗中度镇静的安全性和有效性

Safety and efficacy of target controlled infusion administration of propofol and remifentanil for moderate sedation in non-hospital dental practice.

作者信息

Lobb Douglas, MiriMoghaddam Masoud, Macalister Don, Chrisp David, Shaw Graham, Lai Hollis

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Oral Surgeon, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Feb;23(1):19-28. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.1.19. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fearful and anxious patients who find dental treatment intolerable without sedative and analgesic support may benefit from moderate sedation. Target controlled infusion (TCI) pumps are superior to bolus injection in maintaining low plasma and effect-site concentration variability, resulting in stable, steady-state drug concentrations. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of moderate sedation with remifentanil and propofol using TCI pumps in non-hospital dental settings.

METHODS

A prospective chart review was conducted on 101 patients sedated with propofol and remifentanil using TCI pumps. The charts were completed at two oral surgeons and one general dentist's office over 6 months. Hypoxia, hypotension, bradycardia, and over-sedation were considered adverse events and were collected using Tracking and Reporting Outcomes of Procedural Sedation (TROOPS). Furthermore, patient recovery time, sedation length, drug dose, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were used to measure sedation effectiveness.

RESULTS

Of the 101 reviewed sedation charts, 54 were of men, and 47 were of women. The mean age of the patients was 40.5 ±18.7 years, and their mean BMI was 25.6 ± 4.4. The patients did not experience hypoxia, bradycardia, and hypotension during the 4694 min of sedation. The average minimum Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and heartbeats were 75.1 mmHg and 60.4 bpm, respectively. 98% of patients agreed that the sedation technique met their needs in reducing their anxiety, and 99% agreed that they were satisfied with the sedation 24 hours later. The average sedation time was 46.9 ± 55.6 min, and the average recovery time was 12.4 ± 4.4 min. Remifentanil and propofol had mean initial effect-site concentration doses of 0.96 µ/ml and 1.0 ng/ml respectively. The overall total amount of drug administered was significantly higher in longer sedation procedures compared to shorter ones, while the infusion rate decreased as the procedural stimulus decreased.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, no patients experienced adverse events during sedation, and all patients were kept at a moderate sedation level for a wide range of sedation times and differing procedures. The results showed that TCI pumps are safe and effective for administering propofol and remifentanil for moderate sedation in dentistry.

摘要

背景

对于那些在没有镇静和镇痛支持的情况下无法耐受牙科治疗的恐惧和焦虑患者,中度镇静可能有益。靶控输注(TCI)泵在维持低血浆和效应室浓度变异性方面优于单次注射,可产生稳定的稳态药物浓度。我们评估了在非医院牙科环境中使用TCI泵进行瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚中度镇静的安全性和有效性。

方法

对101例使用TCI泵接受丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼镇静的患者进行前瞻性病历回顾。这些病历在6个月内由两位口腔外科医生和一位普通牙医的办公室完成。低氧、低血压、心动过缓和过度镇静被视为不良事件,并使用程序镇静结果跟踪和报告(TROOPS)进行收集。此外,还使用患者恢复时间、镇静时长、药物剂量和患者满意度问卷来衡量镇静效果。

结果

在101份回顾的镇静病历中,男性54例,女性47例。患者的平均年龄为40.5±18.7岁,平均体重指数为25.

相似文献

7

本文引用的文献

6
Acceptability of intravenous propofol sedation for adolescent dental care.青少年牙科治疗中静脉注射丙泊酚镇静的可接受性。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Jun;21(3):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00482-0. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
8
Conscious Sedation in Dentistry.牙科中的清醒镇静
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul-Dec;8(2):320-323. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_191_18.
9
Propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy.用于胃肠内镜检查的丙泊酚
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Jul;6(6):801-805. doi: 10.1177/2050640618767594. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验