Al Yami Majed S, Alfehaid Lama, Alshehri Abdulmajeed M, Alqahtani Norah, Almuaither Ghadah, Alonazi Shaden H, Alzahrani Mohammed Y, Badawoud Amal M, Almohammed Omar A
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, 2915 Al Haras Al Watani St, Ar Rimayah, Riyadh 14611, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):4685. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134685.
: Apixaban is favored over warfarin for atrial fibrillation (Afib) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to its effectiveness, safety, and lack of routine monitoring. However, managing anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) is challenging due to altered pharmacokinetics and limited safety data. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in these patients. : This retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh included adult patients (≥18 years) with AKI, as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) guideline. Primary outcomes were rates of major and minor bleeding within 30 days, as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), and thrombotic events. Secondary outcomes included 30-day rates of all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions. : Among 513 patients, 294 received apixaban and 219 received warfarin. Major bleeding within 30 days was significantly lower in the apixaban group (3.4%) compared to warfarin (7.3%) ( = 0.0461). Minor bleeding rates were similar (6.5% apixaban vs. 5.5% warfarin; = 0.616). Thrombotic events occurred in 6.8% of patients, with no significant difference between apixaban (6.5%) and warfarin (7.3%) ( = 0.739). Mortality rates were 8.0%, with no significant difference (8.8% apixaban vs. 6.8% warfarin; = 0.3846). Readmission rates were comparable (38.8% for apixaban vs. 39.7% for warfarin; = 0.9499). : In hospitalized AKI patients, apixaban was associated with a lower major bleeding risk compared to warfarin, with similar rates of thrombotic events, mortality, and readmissions, suggesting apixaban may be a safer option, warranting further research.
阿哌沙班因有效性、安全性及无需常规监测,在房颤(Afib)和静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)治疗中比华法林更受青睐。然而,由于药代动力学改变及安全性数据有限,对急性肾损伤(AKI)住院患者进行抗凝管理具有挑战性。本研究评估了阿哌沙班与华法林在这些患者中的安全性和有效性。:这项在利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城进行的回顾性病历审查纳入了符合改善全球肾脏病预后(KDIGO)指南定义的成年AKI患者(≥18岁)。主要结局是国际血栓与止血协会(ISTH)定义的30天内大出血和小出血发生率以及血栓形成事件。次要结局包括30天全因死亡率和再入院率。:在513例患者中,294例接受阿哌沙班治疗,219例接受华法林治疗。阿哌沙班组30天内大出血发生率(3.4%)显著低于华法林组(7.3%)(P = 0.0461)。小出血发生率相似(阿哌沙班组为6.5%,华法林组为5.5%;P = 0.616)。6.8%的患者发生血栓形成事件,阿哌沙班组(6.5%)与华法林组(7.3%)之间无显著差异(P = 0.739)。死亡率为8.0%,无显著差异(阿哌沙班组为8.8%,华法林组为6.8%;P = 0.3846)。再入院率相当(阿哌沙班组为38.