Suppr超能文献

瑞马唑仑在脑深部电刺激手术中对苏醒的潜在优势:病例回顾性分析

The Potential Advantages of Remimazolam for Awakening in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Cases.

作者信息

Byun Sung-Hye, Yeo Jinsong, Lee Sou-Hyun

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 41404, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 3;14(13):4724. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134724.

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires sedation strategies that enable rapid and reliable awakening during intraoperative electrophysiological testing. Although propofol and dexmedetomidine are commonly used, their lack of pharmacological antagonists might delay recovery. In this retrospective case series, we assessed the effects of using remimazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine that is reversible with flumazenil. No existing research has determined whether this may represent a clinically advantageous alternative. Six patients who underwent DBS surgery with monitored anesthetic care between May and August 2024 were included. Two patients received dexmedetomidine and propofol combined, whereas four received remimazolam for initial sedation. The time from sedation discontinuation to intraoperative electrophysiological examination, postoperative hospital stays, and perioperative complications were evaluated. Patients who received remimazolam had shorter awakening intervals (median 17 min) compared to those who received dexmedetomidine and propofol (median 50 min), with a large effect size difference (Cliff's delta -1.00). In all cases of remimazolam, patients were administered flumazenil to facilitate awakening, and transient hypertension requiring nicardipine was observed in some patients. Among the patients who underwent unilateral DBS, those who received remimazolam had shorter postoperative hospital stays (5-7 days) than the patient who received dexmedetomidine and propofol (9 days). No patient had complications. This small retrospective case series indicated that remimazolam, when reversed with flumazenil, was associated with rapid awakening compared with dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients undergoing DBS surgery. However, these findings require validation in larger prospective studies due to the small sample size.

摘要

脑深部电刺激术(DBS)需要镇静策略,以便在术中电生理测试期间实现快速且可靠的苏醒。尽管丙泊酚和右美托咪定常用,但它们缺乏药理拮抗剂可能会延迟恢复。在这个回顾性病例系列中,我们评估了使用瑞马唑仑的效果,瑞马唑仑是一种短效苯二氮䓬类药物,可用氟马西尼逆转。尚无现有研究确定这是否可能是一种临床上更具优势的替代方案。纳入了2024年5月至8月期间接受DBS手术并接受麻醉监测的6例患者。2例患者接受右美托咪定和丙泊酚联合使用,而4例患者接受瑞马唑仑进行初始镇静。评估了从停止镇静到术中电生理检查的时间、术后住院时间和围手术期并发症。与接受右美托咪定和丙泊酚的患者(中位数50分钟)相比,接受瑞马唑仑的患者苏醒间隔时间更短(中位数17分钟),效应量差异较大(克利夫德尔塔为-1.00)。在所有瑞马唑仑病例中,均给患者使用氟马西尼以促进苏醒,部分患者出现需要尼卡地平治疗的短暂性高血压。在接受单侧DBS的患者中,接受瑞马唑仑的患者术后住院时间(5 - 7天)比接受右美托咪定和丙泊酚的患者(9天)短。无患者出现并发症。这个小型回顾性病例系列表明,在接受DBS手术的患者中,与右美托咪定和丙泊酚相比,使用氟马西尼逆转的瑞马唑仑与快速苏醒相关。然而,由于样本量小,这些发现需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbb0/12251503/fac1b34c018b/jcm-14-04724-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验