Aerts Robina, Cuypers Lize, Meijer Eelco F J, Kohnen Michel, Meis Jacques F, Cornely Oliver A, Lagrou Katrien, Salmanton-García Jon
Department of Haematology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mycoses. 2025 Jul;68(7):e70092. doi: 10.1111/myc.70092.
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are a major clinical challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients, and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. With the increasing prevalence of immunosuppressive conditions and ageing populations, the incidence of IFI is rising globally.
This survey aims to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic capacities for IFI in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg (Benelux), a region of high azole-resistance among Aspergillus fumigatus isolates.
A survey evaluating the diagnostic and therapeutic capacity for IFI was conducted in the Benelux. Data were collected from specialists via an online case report form between March and September 2023. The survey addressed patient characteristics, access to microbiology labs, diagnostic methods (microscopy, culture, molecular diagnostics, etc.), IFI incidence, and the availability of antifungal drugs and therapeutic drug monitoring.
In total, 32 hospitals responded to the questionnaire (12 [38%] from the Netherlands, 19 [59%] from Belgium and one [3%] from Luxembourg). Antifungal susceptibility tests were available in 29 institutions (91%), constituting 84% of the centres in Belgium and 100% for the Netherlands (p = 0.265). Aspergillus PCR testing was available in 12 centres in Belgium (63%) while in 11 centres in the Netherlands (92%, p = 0.108). Mucorales PCR testing was available in 56% of centres. Treatment with at least one amphotericin B formulation was only available in 84% of the responding centres. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), although recommended, was possible for voriconazole in 26 centres (81%) while for posaconazole in 24 centres (75%). Significantly more testing (diagnostic tests and TDM) was outsourced in Belgium compared to the Netherlands (p < 0.001).
Antifungal susceptibility testing is widely available in Belgium and the Netherlands, but implementation in areas with high azole resistance for Aspergillus fumigatus is not yet universal, and techniques vary. Tests for coinfections, like Mucorales PCR, were only available in half of the centres. More testing is outsourced in Belgium, likely due to differences in reference centre organisation, country size, transport, and reimbursement. Delays in diagnosis can impact patient outcomes, so awareness of test availability and transport times is crucial.
侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是一项重大的临床挑战,尤其是在免疫功能低下的患者中,并且与高发病率和死亡率相关。随着免疫抑制状况的日益普遍和人口老龄化,IFI的发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。
本调查旨在评估比利时、荷兰和卢森堡(比荷卢经济联盟)对IFI的诊断和治疗能力,该地区烟曲霉分离株的唑类耐药性较高。
对比荷卢经济联盟进行了一项评估IFI诊断和治疗能力的调查。2023年3月至9月期间,通过在线病例报告表从专家那里收集数据。该调查涉及患者特征、微生物实验室的使用情况、诊断方法(显微镜检查、培养、分子诊断等)、IFI发病率以及抗真菌药物的可用性和治疗药物监测。
共有32家医院回复了问卷(12家[38%]来自荷兰,19家[59%]来自比利时,1家[3%]来自卢森堡)。29家机构(91%)可进行抗真菌药敏试验,占比利时中心的84%,荷兰为100%(p = 0.265)。比利时有12个中心(63%)可进行曲霉PCR检测,荷兰有11个中心(92%,p = 0.108)。56%的中心可进行毛霉目PCR检测。只有84%的回复中心可使用至少一种两性霉素B制剂进行治疗。治疗药物监测(TDM)虽然是推荐的,但伏立康唑在26个中心(81%)可进行,泊沙康唑在24个中心(75%)可进行。与荷兰相比,比利时外包的检测(诊断检测和TDM)明显更多(p < 0.001)。
比利时和荷兰广泛提供抗真菌药敏试验,但在烟曲霉唑类耐药性高的地区实施情况尚未普及,且技术各不相同。像毛霉目PCR这样的合并感染检测仅在一半的中心可用。比利时外包的检测更多,这可能是由于参考中心组织、国家规模、运输和报销方面的差异。诊断延迟会影响患者的治疗结果,因此了解检测可用性和运输时间至关重要。