Zhao Ruixue, Kim Sungmin, Lee Mal-Soon, Jackson Benjamin A, Deng Fuli, Chen Xiaomai, Zhou Cong, Khivantsev Konstantin, Liu Yue, Glezakou Vassiliki-Alexandra, Rousseau Roger, Lercher Johannes A
Department of Chemistry and Catalysis Research Center, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstrasse 4, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Institute for Integrated Catalysis, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
J Am Chem Soc. 2025 Jul 23;147(29):26049-26059. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c09340. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
Understanding the quantitative interactions among zeolite pore walls, Bro̷nsted acid sites, and molecules with both polar and nonpolar regions is essential for scoping out the potential of zeolites as sorbents and catalysts. Purely siliceous zeolites ( and in the present study) are hydrophobic, whereas those containing aluminum are considered hydrophilic, preferentially adsorbing organic molecules even in aqueous environments. To characterize these interactions, we use primary alcohols of increasing molecular weight, quantifying their specific interactions in the confined pore space of the alkyl (CH) and OH groups. Three types of interactions were identified: (i) alkyl CH groups interacting with the zeolite pore walls (approximately 10 kJ mol per carbon), (ii) alcohol OH groups interacting with the pore walls (30-35 kJ mol), and (iii) alcohol OH groups interacting with Bro̷nsted acid sites (37 kJ mol). All three interactions were well mirrored by computational simulations. The contribution of the alkyl CH groups was inferred from the incremental increase in sorption enthalpy with increasing molecular weight; the interaction strength of the OH groups was determined by extrapolating the global adsorption enthalpy of the alcohols to a hypothetical OH group without an alkyl group. This value was identical to the adsorption enthalpy of water. The experiments demonstrated that only water has an adsorption enthalpy on zeolite pore walls lower than its condensation enthalpy (30-35 kJ mol vs 45 kJ mol), limiting the concentration of water that can be adsorbed.
了解沸石孔壁、布朗斯特酸位点以及具有极性和非极性区域的分子之间的定量相互作用,对于评估沸石作为吸附剂和催化剂的潜力至关重要。纯硅沸石(本研究中的 和 )具有疏水性,而含铝的沸石则被认为具有亲水性,即使在水性环境中也优先吸附有机分子。为了表征这些相互作用,我们使用分子量不断增加的伯醇,量化它们在烷基(CH)和OH基团受限孔空间中的特定相互作用。确定了三种相互作用类型:(i)烷基CH基团与沸石孔壁相互作用(每个碳原子约10 kJ/mol),(ii)醇OH基团与孔壁相互作用(30 - 35 kJ/mol),以及(iii)醇OH基团与布朗斯特酸位点相互作用(37 kJ/mol)。所有这三种相互作用都通过计算模拟得到了很好的反映。烷基CH基团的贡献是通过吸附焓随分子量增加的增量增加推断出来的;OH基团的相互作用强度是通过将醇的整体吸附焓外推到没有烷基的假设OH基团来确定的。这个值与水的吸附焓相同。实验表明,只有水在沸石孔壁上的吸附焓低于其冷凝焓(30 - 35 kJ/mol对45 kJ/mol),这限制了可吸附水的浓度。