Sun Ming, Manson Martijn L, Märtson Anne-Grete, Bodilsen Jacob, de Lange Elizabeth C M, Guo Tingjie
Systems Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
ESCMID Study Group for Infectious Diseases of the Brain (ESGIB), Basel, Switzerland.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025 Jul 13. doi: 10.1007/s40262-025-01545-w.
Acyclovir is a primary treatment for central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). However, patient outcomes remain suboptimal, despite acyclovir treatment. Given the lack of alternative therapies, there is a pressing clinical need to revisit acyclovir dosing for viral encephalitis. This study aimed to evaluate current and alternative acyclovir dosing regimens using a Bayesian CNS physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach.
A full Bayesian analysis was performed using LeiCNS3.0 model to describe acyclovir's CNS distribution. Simulations were performed for standard dosing (10 mg/kg TID) and various alternative dosing regimens. Drug efficacy was evaluated using 50%fT > IC (50% of the dosing interval with drug concentration above IC) and C > IC (minimum concentration of the drug exceeding IC). A toxicity threshold of 25 mg/L for plasma peak concentration was applied.
The standard regimen (10 mg/kg TID) achieved the 50%fT > IC target but failed to consistently meet the C > IC target, particularly for VZV. Alternative regimens of increasing the dosing frequency to QID or extending infusion durations to 1.5 h or 2 h improved efficacy while maintaining safety. Prolonged infusion durations reduced peak plasma concentration thus lowered toxicity risks CONCLUSIONS: The Bayesian CNS PBPK modeling approach demonstrated robust predictive capacity for CNS PK. Current acyclovir dosing regimens may be inadequate for treating HSV and VZV encephalitis. Alternative dosing strategies involving increased frequency or extended infusion durations appear more effective and safer. Future efforts should focus on refining the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship between acyclovir exposure and antiviral efficacy to improve therapeutic outcomes.
阿昔洛韦是治疗由单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)和水痘 - 带状疱疹病毒(VZV)引起的中枢神经系统(CNS)感染的主要药物。然而,尽管使用了阿昔洛韦治疗,患者的治疗效果仍不理想。鉴于缺乏替代疗法,临床上迫切需要重新审视病毒性脑炎的阿昔洛韦给药方案。本研究旨在使用基于贝叶斯中枢神经系统生理药代动力学(PBPK)建模方法评估当前和替代的阿昔洛韦给药方案。
使用LeiCNS3.0模型进行全面的贝叶斯分析,以描述阿昔洛韦在中枢神经系统中的分布。对标准给药方案(10mg/kg,每日三次)和各种替代给药方案进行了模拟。使用50%fT > IC(给药间隔时间内50%的时间药物浓度高于IC)和C > IC(药物的最低浓度超过IC)评估药物疗效。血浆峰浓度的毒性阈值设定为25mg/L。
标准方案(10mg/kg,每日三次)达到了50%fT > IC目标,但未能始终满足C > IC目标,尤其是对于VZV。将给药频率增加至每日四次或延长输注时间至1.5小时或2小时的替代方案在保持安全性的同时提高了疗效。延长输注时间降低了血浆峰浓度,从而降低了毒性风险。结论:贝叶斯中枢神经系统PBPK建模方法显示出对中枢神经系统药代动力学强大的预测能力。当前的阿昔洛韦给药方案可能不足以治疗HSV和VZV脑炎。涉及增加给药频率或延长输注时间的替代给药策略似乎更有效且更安全。未来的工作应集中在完善阿昔洛韦暴露与抗病毒疗效之间的药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)关系,以改善治疗效果。