Suppr超能文献

硅酸钙类和树脂类根管封闭剂对术后疼痛及封闭剂挤出的影响:一项多中心随机临床研究

The Impact of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain and Sealer Extrusion: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Study.

作者信息

Ensinas Pablo, Aranguren José, Tosco Vincenzo, Franco Carlos, Pineda Kenneth, Malvicini Giulia, Pérez Alejandro R

机构信息

Private Practice in Argentina, Salta, Argentina.

Department of Endodontics, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Endod. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.07.004.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain remains a critical concern in endodontic treatment, influenced by multiple factors, including the choice of root canal sealer. Calcium silicate-based sealers like NeoSealerFlo offer biocompatibility and bioactivity, while resin-based sealers such as AH Plus are widely regarded as the gold standard in endodontics. This study aimed to compare postoperative pain and sealer extrusion between these two materials in a large-scale clinical setting.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, 564 root canal-treated teeth were obturated with either NeoSealerFlo (n = 305) or AH Plus (n = 259). Patients were categorized based on pulpal diagnosis (asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis, pulp necrosis, and previously treated cases) with no or asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, the Friedman test, analysis of variance, general linear model analysis, and logistic regression to evaluate the effects of sealer type, sealer extrusion, and apical periodontitis on pain outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 305 cases were obturated using NeoSealerFlo and 259 with AH Plus. At 24 hours, the incidence of postoperative pain was significantly higher in the AH Plus group (46.7%) than in the NeoSealerFlo group (38.4%) (P < .05). Pain levels were also higher for AH Plus (4.83 ± 2.01) than NeoSealerFlo (4.05 ± 2.30) (P < .001). Pain decreased in both groups at 48 hours and 72 hours, with no significant differences. Sealer extrusion occurred in 44.1% of cases, more frequently with NeoSealerFlo (50.2%) than AH Plus (37.1%); however, it was associated with higher pain in the AH Plus group. Cases of pulp necrosis exhibited the highest pain levels, while previously treated cases had the lowest pain. General linear model and logistic regression confirmed AH Plus use, sealer extrusion, and apical periodontitis as significant predictors of postoperative pain.

CONCLUSIONS

NeoSealerFlo was associated with lower postoperative pain at 24 hours despite a higher extrusion rate. Sealer differences diminished over time, indicating that both materials provide comparable long-term clinical pain outcomes.

摘要

引言

术后疼痛仍是牙髓治疗中的一个关键问题,受多种因素影响,包括根管封闭剂的选择。像NeoSealerFlo这样的硅酸钙基封闭剂具有生物相容性和生物活性,而树脂基封闭剂如AH Plus被广泛视为牙髓病学的金标准。本研究旨在大规模临床环境中比较这两种材料的术后疼痛和封闭剂挤出情况。

方法

在这项多中心随机临床试验中,564颗接受根管治疗的牙齿分别用NeoSealerFlo(n = 305)或AH Plus(n = 259)进行充填。患者根据牙髓诊断(无症状性不可逆性牙髓炎、牙髓坏死和既往治疗病例)进行分类,且无或有无症状性根尖周炎。在术后24、48和72小时使用视觉模拟量表评估术后疼痛。统计分析包括卡方检验、弗里德曼检验、方差分析、一般线性模型分析和逻辑回归,以评估封闭剂类型、封闭剂挤出和根尖周炎对疼痛结果的影响。

结果

共305例使用NeoSealerFlo进行充填,259例使用AH Plus进行充填。在24小时时,AH Plus组术后疼痛发生率(46.7%)显著高于NeoSealerFlo组(38.4%)(P <.05)。AH Plus的疼痛程度(4.83±2.01)也高于NeoSealerFlo(4.05±2.30)(P <.001)。两组在48小时和72小时时疼痛均减轻,无显著差异。44.1%的病例出现封闭剂挤出,NeoSealerFlo(50.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验