Hollenberg Zachary, Parkin Claire
Medical Student at Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, UK.
Medical Education at Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, UK.
J CME. 2025 Jul 10;14(1):2525692. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2025.2525692. eCollection 2025.
Higher education institutions around the world have a responsibility to diversify their course content. This is an important consideration to ensure that students are prepared to serve a diverse population once they graduate, however, a lack of diversity representation in medical school curricula in particular, is reported in the literature. A paucity of reliable resources to support creating more inclusive content is also reported. This study developed and validated a diversity measurement instrument, designed to look at representation in the areas of gender, religion, age, disability, ethnicity/race, sexuality, and socio-economic status. Early prototypes were sent to experts for validity testing and using their feedback, improvements and iterations were made to the instrument until the final instrument was agreed: the GRADES10©. The instrument was then applied to a variety of medical education resources to test for rater-reliability. An accompanying user guide was developed to support users with the application of the GRADES10© in practice. Face validity was conducted by 10 experts on several iterations of the instrument from the early prototype (GRADESs7), until the final agreed GRADES10©. Rater-reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's Alpha measure of internal consistency. The GRADES10© instrument was shown to have an ICC of 0.83% (SD 0.725-0.907) = < .0001, and Cronbach's Alpha of 0.97. Overall, this study has shown that the validated GRADES10© instrument is able to measure diversity in medical teaching resources reliably. The GRADES10© has the potential to contribute to creating a more inclusive learning environment by allowing its users to apply a diversity metric to their educational materials, to identify gaps and areas for improvement. If applied by medical schools and organisations offering continuing medical education courses in future, the GRADES10© may impact the grassroots of medical education diversification, which may have a beneficial effect on medical student and doctors' attitudes, experiences and ultimately on patient care.
世界各地的高等教育机构有责任使其课程内容多样化。这是一个重要的考量因素,以确保学生毕业后有能力为多样化的人群服务。然而,文献报道称,医学院课程中尤其缺乏多样性的体现。此外,也有报道指出,缺乏可靠的资源来支持创建更具包容性的内容。本研究开发并验证了一种多样性测量工具,旨在考察性别、宗教、年龄、残疾、种族/民族、性取向和社会经济地位等方面的体现情况。早期的原型被发送给专家进行效度测试,并根据他们的反馈对工具进行改进和迭代,直到最终确定了GRADES10©。然后将该工具应用于各种医学教育资源,以测试评分者信度。同时还开发了一份配套的用户指南,以支持用户在实践中应用GRADES10©。由10位专家对该工具从早期原型(GRADES7)到最终确定的GRADES10©的多个版本进行了表面效度评估。评分者信度通过组内相关系数(ICC)和Cronbach's Alpha内部一致性测量来计算。结果显示,GRADES10©工具的ICC为0.83%(标准差0.725 - 0.907)= <.0001,Cronbach's Alpha为0.97。总体而言,本研究表明,经过验证的GRADES10©工具能够可靠地测量医学教学资源中的多样性。GRADES10©有潜力通过允许用户将多样性指标应用于其教育材料,识别差距和改进领域,从而有助于创建更具包容性的学习环境。如果未来医学院校和提供继续医学教育课程的组织应用GRADES10©,可能会影响医学教育多样化的基层工作,这可能对医学生和医生的态度、经历以及最终的患者护理产生有益影响。