• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防性使用去氧肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素对腰麻下剖宫产母婴结局的影响:一项采用序贯试验分析的系统评价和荟萃分析

Effect of prophylactic phenylephrine versus norepinephrine on foeto-maternal outcomes in caesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

作者信息

Bandyopadhyay Anjishnujit, Sawhney Chhavi, Haldar Partha, Pathak Sharmishtha

机构信息

Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, JPNATC, AIIMS, Delhi, India.

Community Medicine, AIIMS, Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jul;69(7):638-649. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1063_24. Epub 2025 Jun 12.

DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_1063_24
PMID:40657153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12244457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prevention of hypotension in parturients scheduled for caesarean section is of utmost importance for improving foeto-maternal outcomes. We compared the prophylactic use of phenylephrine (PE) and norepinephrine (NE) on foeto-maternal outcomes in women undergoing caesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia. Umbilical artery (UA) pH was the primary objective, and umbilical vein (UV) pH, APGAR scores, incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, and hypertension were secondary objectives.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL databases were searched to identify all relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2023, further updated till May 2025. Our review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023429328). The effect of PE and NE on UA pH was our primary outcome. The quality of evidence of outcomes was graded using the GRADE methodology. Only RCTs involving term pregnant females undergoing caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia were included.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials (2138 patients) were included in the final analysis. NE and PE were comparable in terms of UA and UV pH, with standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.18 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.09; 0.45] (I = 81%, < 0.01) and -0.39 (95% CI: -0.82; 0.04) (I = 91%, < 0.01), respectively. NE group had significantly lesser episodes of bradycardia [Relative Risk (RR): 0.44 (95% CI: 0.34; 0.56) (I = 28%, = 0.15)] and hypertension [RR: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.33; 0.90) (I = 0%, = 0.62)], but incidence of hypotension was comparable between groups [RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.82; 1.18) (I = 18%, = 0.25)]. Trial sequential analysis revealed that the required information size was reached for the outcome of bradycardia only.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to recommend using NE preemptively to improve foetal outcomes. Further studies are recommended to validate its effect.

摘要

背景与目的

预防剖宫产产妇的低血压对于改善母婴结局至关重要。我们比较了去氧肾上腺素(PE)和去甲肾上腺素(NE)在接受椎管内麻醉的剖宫产妇女中预防性使用对母婴结局的影响。脐动脉(UA)pH值是主要观察指标,脐静脉(UV)pH值、阿氏评分、心动过缓、低血压和高血压的发生率是次要观察指标。

方法

检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、谷歌学术和CENTRAL数据库,以识别截至2023年4月发表的所有相关随机对照试验(RCT),并进一步更新至2025年5月。我们的综述已在PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42023429328)上进行了前瞻性注册。PE和NE对UA pH值的影响是我们的主要结局。使用GRADE方法对结局的证据质量进行分级。仅纳入了涉及在椎管内麻醉下接受剖宫产的足月妊娠女性的RCT。

结果

最终分析纳入了17项试验(2138例患者)。NE和PE在UA和UV pH值方面相当,标准化均数差(SMD)分别为0.18 [95%置信区间(CI):-0.09;0.45](I² = 81%,P < 0.01)和-0.39(95% CI:-0.82;0.04)(I² = 91%,P < 0.01)。NE组的心动过缓发作次数[相对危险度(RR):0.44(95% CI:0.34;0.56)(I² = 28%,P = 0.15)]和高血压发作次数[RR:0.54(95% CI:0.33;0.90)(I² = 0%,P = 0.62)]显著较少,但两组间低血压的发生率相当[RR:0.99(95% CI:0.82;1.18)(I² = 18%,P = 0.25)]。试验序贯分析显示,仅心动过缓结局达到了所需的信息规模。

结论

没有足够的证据推荐预防性使用NE来改善胎儿结局。建议进一步研究以验证其效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/c8d03f087fcf/IJA-69-638-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/e18cddd377a2/IJA-69-638-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/fed40f8b9907/IJA-69-638-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/acd78c4dfcdb/IJA-69-638-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/837a9cb79f2a/IJA-69-638-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/c8d03f087fcf/IJA-69-638-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/e18cddd377a2/IJA-69-638-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/fed40f8b9907/IJA-69-638-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/acd78c4dfcdb/IJA-69-638-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/837a9cb79f2a/IJA-69-638-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fa/12244457/c8d03f087fcf/IJA-69-638-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of prophylactic phenylephrine versus norepinephrine on foeto-maternal outcomes in caesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.预防性使用去氧肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素对腰麻下剖宫产母婴结局的影响:一项采用序贯试验分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jul;69(7):638-649. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1063_24. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.有剖宫产史的女性足月引产方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 9;6(6):CD009792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub3.
3
Prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to treat hypotension after spinal anaesthesia during caesarean section: a meta-analysis.剖宫产术中脊麻后低血压预防性去甲肾上腺素输注治疗的荟萃分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;44(1):2393379. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2024.2393379. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section.剖宫产术中困难分娩的辅助技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 31;2016(1):CD004944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004944.pub3.
6
Cell salvage for the management of postpartum haemorrhage.采用细胞回收技术管理产后出血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD016120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016120.
7
Caesarean myomectomy in pregnant women with uterine fibroids.患有子宫肌瘤的孕妇行剖宫产肌瘤切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD016119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016119.
8
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
9
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.
10
Acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress.针对子宫收缩过速或疑似胎儿窘迫的急性宫缩抑制。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 4;7(7):CD009770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009770.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性静脉注射去甲肾上腺素预防择期剖宫产脊髓麻醉期间低血压:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1247214. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1247214. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of Prophylactic Infusion of Phenylephrine Versus Norepinephrine for the Prevention of Post Spinal Hypotension in Parturients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section-a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Non-Inferiority Trial.去氧肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素预防性输注用于择期剖宫产产妇预防脊髓麻醉后低血压的比较——一项随机、双盲、非劣效性试验
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2023 Jun 16;51(3):213-2018. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2022.22909.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.剖宫产脊髓麻醉中预防性使用去甲肾上腺素和去氧肾上腺素的疗效及安全性比较:一项采用试验序贯分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 28;13:1015325. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325. eCollection 2022.
4
Determination of the Relative Potency of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Given as Infusions for Preventing Hypotension During Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Up-And-Down Sequential Allocation Study.剖宫产腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉期间输注去甲肾上腺素和去氧肾上腺素预防低血压的相对效价测定:一项随机上下序贯分配研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 14;13:942005. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.942005. eCollection 2022.
5
Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for postspinal hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.去甲肾上腺素与苯肾上腺素治疗剖宫产产妇脊髓后低血压的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Dec;88(12):1043-1056. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16654-X. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Preventing Spinal Hypotension During Cesarean Birth With Two Initial Boluses of Norepinephrine in Chinese Parturients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.在接受剖宫产的中国产妇中使用两剂去甲肾上腺素初始负荷量预防脊髓低血压:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2023 Jan 1;136(1):94-100. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006110. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
7
Comparison of prophylactic phenylephrine and norepinephrine infusion on umbilical arterial pH and maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.剖宫产脊髓麻醉期间预防性输注去氧肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素对脐动脉pH值和产妇血压的比较。
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Mar;66(Suppl 2):S115-S121. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_345_21. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study.在双胎妊娠行剖宫产时,比较预防性去甲肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素输注对脊髓麻醉的影响:一项随机、双盲的临床研究。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Mar 24;16:789-798. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S357507. eCollection 2022.
9
Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion for preventing postspinal hypotension during cesarean section for twin pregnancy: a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.去甲肾上腺素与苯肾上腺素输注预防双胎妊娠剖宫产术后脊麻低血压:一项双盲随机对照临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01562-3.
10
Neonatal outcomes following prophylactic administration of phenylephrine or noradrenaline in women undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery: A randomised clinical trial.择期剖宫产产妇预防性应用去氧肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素对新生儿结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Mar 1;39(3):269-276. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001634.