Shi Shi, Quagraine Ibrahim M, Cakir Gokce Busra, Murray Jordan, Shaikh Aasef G, Ghasia Fatema F
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jul 1;66(9):39. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.9.39.
This study uses dichoptic visual search and psychophysical visual function data to understand factors that impact amblyopic eyes' ability to perceive the stimulus while the fellow eye (FE) contrast is reduced under dichoptic viewing in children and adults.
Twenty-three amblyopic (anisometropic = 11, strabismic/mixed = 11) and 14 control participants performed visual search and spot-the-difference tasks during monocular and dichoptic viewing with amblyopic eye (AE) contrast held constant at 100% while FE contrasts varied at 100%,50%,25% and 10%. Accuracies and reaction times were analyzed and correlated with visual acuity deficit of amblyopic eye, stereoacuity and suppression.
Amblyopic participants showed reduced accuracies and longer reaction times in visual search and spot-the-difference tasks. Reducing the FE contrast improved their ability to identify the targets and differences with greater improvement observed for anisometropic than strabismic subjects. However, participants with higher suppression, visual acuity deficits in the AE, and stereoacuity deficits faced greater difficulties, with reduced accuracies and reaction time, especially at high FE contrasts. For tasks requiring comparison between AE and FE regions to spot-the-differences, deficits in AE visual acuity, suppression and stereoacuity were linked to reduced accuracy and increased reaction times, even at 10% FE contrasts.
The study highlights the challenges amblyopic participants face in dichoptic tasks, particularly at high FE contrasts. Dichoptic contrast modulation holds promise in enhancing the perception of the AE with responses varying by visual function deficits. It also highlights that quantification of perception of the AE in dichoptic environment with tools such as visual search may allow tailoring of passive video-based dichoptic therapies.
本研究利用双眼分视视觉搜索和心理物理学视觉功能数据,以了解在儿童和成人双眼分视观看时,当健眼(FE)对比度降低时,影响弱视眼感知刺激能力的因素。
23名弱视患者(屈光参差性弱视=11名,斜视性/混合性弱视=11名)和14名对照参与者在单眼和双眼分视观看期间执行视觉搜索和找不同任务,弱视眼(AE)对比度保持在100%不变,而FE对比度分别为100%、50%、25%和10%。分析准确率和反应时间,并与弱视眼的视力缺陷、立体视锐度和抑制情况相关联。
弱视参与者在视觉搜索和找不同任务中的准确率降低,反应时间延长。降低FE对比度提高了他们识别目标和差异的能力,屈光参差性弱视患者比斜视性弱视患者改善更明显。然而,抑制程度较高、AE视力缺陷和立体视锐度缺陷的参与者面临更大困难,准确率和反应时间降低,尤其是在高FE对比度时。对于需要比较AE和FE区域以找出差异的任务,即使在10%的FE对比度下,AE视力、抑制和立体视锐度的缺陷也与准确率降低和反应时间增加有关。
该研究突出了弱视参与者在双眼分视任务中面临的挑战,尤其是在高FE对比度时。双眼分视对比度调制有望增强AE的感知,其反应因视觉功能缺陷而异。它还强调,使用视觉搜索等工具在双眼分视环境中量化AE的感知,可能有助于定制基于被动视频的双眼分视疗法。