Månsson Alf
Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Science, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s10974-025-09698-8.
The relative timing of the force-generating power stroke and release of the ATP-hydrolysis product orthophosphate (Pi) in actomyosin energy transduction is debated. It may be explored by studying the tension response to sudden changes in [Pi] during isometric muscle contraction (Pi-transients; rate constant k) and by the rate of redevelopment of isometric force (k) after a period of unloaded shortening at varied [Pi]. Most studies of these types are interpreted using simple kinetic schemes that ignore the range of elastic strains of actin-attached myosin cross-bridges. We found that the only simple scheme which accounts for the experimental findings of single exponential Pi-transients with k ≈ k has force-generation coincident with actin-myosin attachment. This characteristics could compromise the high power output of muscle. We therefore turned to a mechanokinetic model, allowing consideration of the varying elastic cross-bridge strains. Our model assumes Pi-release between cross-bridge attachment and the force-generating power stroke. However, power strokes only occur if cross-bridges attach in a pre-power-stroke state with zero or negative elastic strain (counteracting shortening). The model suggests two components of the Pi-transients. One is attributed to slow cross-bridge detachment from the pre-power-stroke state at positive elastic strain upon Pi-binding. The other is due to Pi-induced shifts in equilibrium with rapid power stroke reversal. The slow component dominates for all parameter values tested but the fast component is ubiquitous, predicting a biphasic Pi-transient in disagreement with experiments. Strikingly, however, the mechanokinetic model gives different predictions than apparently similar simple kinetic schemes and we do not rule out the existence of parameter values leading to a negligible fast component. We also show that the assumption of secondary Pi-binding sites on myosin outside the active site removes the fast component albeit without predicting that k ≈ k. Additional studies are required to finally corroborate that k ≈ k in experiments but also to further develop mechanokinetic models combined with multistep Pi-release.
在肌动球蛋白能量转换过程中,产生力的动力冲程与三磷酸腺苷(ATP)水解产物正磷酸盐(Pi)释放的相对时间存在争议。可以通过研究等长肌肉收缩期间[Pi]突然变化时的张力反应(Pi瞬变;速率常数k)以及在不同[Pi]下进行一段时间无负荷缩短后等长力的重新发展速率(k)来进行探究。大多数这类研究都是使用简单的动力学方案来解释的,这些方案忽略了附着在肌动蛋白上的肌球蛋白横桥的弹性应变范围。我们发现,唯一能解释k≈k的单指数Pi瞬变实验结果的简单方案是,力的产生与肌动蛋白 - 肌球蛋白附着同时发生。这一特性可能会损害肌肉的高功率输出。因此,我们转向了一个机械动力学模型,该模型允许考虑变化的弹性横桥应变。我们的模型假设Pi在横桥附着和产生力的动力冲程之间释放。然而,动力冲程仅在横桥以零或负弹性应变(抵抗缩短)的动力冲程前状态附着时才会发生。该模型表明Pi瞬变有两个组成部分。一个归因于Pi结合后,在正弹性应变下,横桥从动力冲程前状态缓慢脱离。另一个是由于Pi诱导的平衡变化以及快速的动力冲程逆转。在所测试的所有参数值中,慢成分占主导,但快成分普遍存在,预测出与实验不符的双相Pi瞬变。然而,引人注目的是,机械动力学模型给出的预测与看似相似的简单动力学方案不同,并且我们不排除存在导致快成分可忽略不计的参数值。我们还表明,在活性位点之外的肌球蛋白上存在次级Pi结合位点的假设消除了快成分,尽管没有预测到k≈k。最终证实实验中k≈k还需要更多研究,同时也需要进一步发展结合多步Pi释放的机械动力学模型。