• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗需求法律的影响:对华盛顿州非自愿治疗法案的一项研究。

Implications of need-for-treatment laws: a study of Washington State's Involuntary Treatment Act.

作者信息

Durham M L

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Sep;36(9):975-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.9.975.

DOI:10.1176/ps.36.9.975
PMID:4065858
Abstract

In 1979 the State of Washington revised its civil commitment law to make it easier to hospitalize patients in need of care but not imminently dangerous to themselves or others. To assess the impact of the law, the author studied commitment patterns in Washington for two-year periods before and after the revised law went into effect. Results indicate that the number of involuntary commitments increased substantially after the law was revised, and the commitments were more likely to be based on grave disability rather than on dangerousness even if patients had engaged in violent behavior. However, the mental health system did not expand sufficiently to meet the needs of the increased patient population. Implications of Washington's experience for states considering passage of need-for-treatment legislation are discussed.

摘要

1979年,华盛顿州修订了其民事收容法,以便更易于将需要护理但对自身或他人并无紧迫危险的患者送进医院。为评估该法律的影响,作者研究了华盛顿州在修订后的法律生效前后两个两年期内的收容模式。结果表明,法律修订后非自愿收容的人数大幅增加,而且即使患者有暴力行为,收容更有可能基于严重残疾而非危险性。然而,心理健康系统并未充分扩张以满足增加的患者群体的需求。文中讨论了华盛顿州的经验对考虑通过治疗需求立法的各州的启示。

相似文献

1
Implications of need-for-treatment laws: a study of Washington State's Involuntary Treatment Act.治疗需求法律的影响:对华盛顿州非自愿治疗法案的一项研究。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Sep;36(9):975-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.9.975.
2
Need-for-treatment criteria for involuntary civil commitment: impact in practice.非自愿民事住院治疗的治疗需求标准:实际影响
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Oct;149(10):1380-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.10.1380.
3
Legal intervention in civil commitment: the impact of broadened commitment criteria.民事强制住院中的法律干预:放宽的强制住院标准的影响。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1986 Mar(484):42-55.
4
The impact of broadened civil commitment standards on admissions to state mental hospitals.放宽民事收容标准对州立精神病院收容情况的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;142(1):104-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.1.104.
5
The impact of public policy and publicity on admissions to state mental health hospitals.公共政策与宣传对州立精神病医院收治情况的影响。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Spring;11(1):41-66. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-1-41.
6
Involuntary community treatment of people who are violent and mentally ill: a legal analysis.对暴力且患有精神疾病者的非自愿社区治疗:一项法律分析
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;45(7):685-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.7.685.
7
The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.明显需要治疗的患病患者:民事收容的第四条标准。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;36(3):259-64. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.3.259.
8
[The imminent peril in the law of July the fifth 2011, two years later: the impact on health?].[2011年7月5日法律中的紧迫危险,两年后:对健康的影响?]
Encephale. 2014 Dec;40(6):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
The test of compulsion in mental health law: capacity, therapeutic benefit and dangerousness as possible criteria.精神卫生法中的强制测试:能力、治疗益处和危险性作为可能的标准。
Med Law Rev. 2003 Autumn;11(3):326-52. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/11.3.326.
10
[Civil commitment of mentally ill patients: developments in Flanders].[精神病患者的民事强制住院:佛兰德地区的发展情况]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50 Spec no.:55-60.