Lim Hunjong, Cho Se Jin, Jeong Younbeom, Jeong So Yeong, Baek Jung Hwan
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Thyroid. 2025 Jul;35(7):748-762. doi: 10.1089/thy.2024.0679. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
The management of indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs), classified as Bethesda III and IV, is challenging due to biopsy limitations in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. While diagnostic lobectomy is the standard, thermal ablation (TA) is increasingly considered for patients ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA for ITNs. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases was conducted through May 11, 2025, for studies on ITNs treated with TA, with ≥12 months of follow-up and reported clinical or safety outcomes. Case reports, abstracts, and reviews were excluded. Two radiologists independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes included volume reduction rate (VRR), regrowth, delayed surgeries, malignancy detection, and complications. The Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies (RoBANS) tool was used for quality assessment. A random-effects model synthesized pooled estimates, with heterogeneity quantified by Higgins' . A total of 15 studies with 1149 nodules were analyzed, showing progressive VRR increase, plateauing at 48 months. The pooled 12-month VRR was 81.0% (confidence interval: 76.0-85.9%). Hydrodissection significantly improved VRR at 6 months ( = 0.03), while larger nodules were more prone to regrowth. Major complications occurred in 1.8% (21/1149), with no reported metastasis. Regrowth and delayed surgery occurred in 2.3% (26/1149) and 0.3% (4/1149), respectively, with three malignancies upon delayed surgery. TA may be considered a minimally invasive alternative for ITNs who are not candidates for or decline surgery, demonstrating favorable efficacy and safety. However, study limitations, short follow-up, and residual malignancy risk necessitate careful follow-up, particularly for larger nodules. Advanced TA techniques such as hydrodissection may enhance outcomes by increasing the likelihood of complete ablation. Long-term prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to confirm TA's role in clinical practice.
对于分类为贝塞斯达Ⅲ类和Ⅳ类的不确定甲状腺结节(ITN),由于活检在区分良性与恶性结节方面存在局限性,其管理颇具挑战性。虽然诊断性肺叶切除术是标准治疗方法,但对于不符合手术条件或不愿接受手术的患者,热消融(TA)越来越受到关注。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了TA治疗ITN的疗效和安全性。通过对MEDLINE、EMBASE和COCHRANE数据库进行全面检索,截至2025年5月11日,查找关于接受TA治疗且随访时间≥12个月并报告了临床或安全结局的ITN研究。排除病例报告、摘要和综述。两名放射科医生独立进行数据提取和质量评估。结局指标包括体积缩小率(VRR)、复发、延迟手术、恶性肿瘤检测和并发症。使用非随机研究偏倚风险(RoBANS)工具进行质量评估。采用随机效应模型综合汇总估计值,异质性用希金斯法进行量化。共分析了15项研究中的1149个结节,结果显示VRR呈渐进性增加,在48个月时趋于平稳。汇总的12个月VRR为81.0%(置信区间:76.0 - 85.9%)。水分离术在6个月时显著提高了VRR(P = 0.03),而较大的结节更容易复发。主要并发症发生率为1.8%(21/1149),未报告转移情况。复发和延迟手术发生率分别为2.3%(26/1149)和0.3%(4/1149),延迟手术时有3例恶性肿瘤。对于不适合或拒绝手术的ITN患者,TA可被视为一种微创替代方法,显示出良好的疗效和安全性。然而,研究存在局限性、随访时间短以及残留恶性肿瘤风险,因此需要仔细随访,尤其是对于较大的结节。诸如水分离术等先进的TA技术可能通过增加完全消融的可能性来改善结局。需要长期前瞻性研究和随机试验来证实TA在临床实践中的作用。