Xu Huajun, Zhou Jianfei, Zhang Huimei
Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Ultrasound, Zhe Jiang Sheng Yi Liao Jian Kang Ji Tuan Chang Xing Yi Yuan, Huzhou, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25427. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09595-7.
To explore the clinical significance of ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) gel in the treatment of supraspinatus tendon tears. 82 patients with mild or moderate supraspinatus tendon tears were divided into three groups and were administered with different treatments. VAS scores, Constant-Murley scores, fat infiltration, as well as the treatment efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions were evaluated. At 3 months postoperatively, PRP gel group (2.07 ± 0.52 vs. 2.80 ± 0.85, t = 3.84, P = 0.0003) and PRP group (2.33 ± 0.55 vs. 2.80 ± 0.85, t = 2.33, P = 0.02) showed lower VAS scores than sodium hyaluronate group. At 6 months postoperatively, the PRP gel group revealed significantly lower VAS scores than both PRP group (2.13 ± 0.57 vs. 2.67 ± 0.71, t = 3.07, P = 0.003) and sodium hyaluronate group (2.13 ± 0.57 vs. 3.17 ± 1.02, t = 4.67, P < 0.0001). At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the PRP gel group exhibited statistically higher Constant-Murley scores compared to both the PRP and sodium hyaluronate groups (P < 0.05). At 6 months after surgery, musculoskeletal ultrasound revealed that PRP gel and PRP groups displayed lower fat infiltration in the supraspinatus muscle than those in sodium hyaluronate group (1.86 ± 0.52 vs. 1.96 ± 0.64 vs. 2.32 ± 0.55, F = 5.06, P = 0.008). Additionally, at this time point, efficacy rate for patients in PRP gel group was significantly higher than that observed in either PRP group or sodium hyaluronate group (93.10% vs. 80.77% vs. 66.67%, χ = 6.14, P = 0.01). In conclusion, ultrasound-guided PRP gel treatment can not only improve pain and joint function but also decrease fat infiltration, thereby enhancing treatment efficacy for supraspinatus tendon tears.
探讨超声引导下富血小板血浆(PRP)凝胶治疗冈上肌腱撕裂的临床意义。将82例轻、中度冈上肌腱撕裂患者分为三组,给予不同治疗。评估视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Constant-Murley评分、脂肪浸润情况以及治疗效果和不良反应发生率。术后3个月,PRP凝胶组(2.07±0.52 vs. 2.80±0.85,t = 3.84,P = 0.0003)和PRP组(2.33±0.55 vs. 2.80±0.85,t = 2.33,P = 0.02)的VAS评分低于透明质酸钠组。术后6个月,PRP凝胶组的VAS评分显著低于PRP组(2.13±0.57 vs. 2.67±0.71,t = 3.07,P = 0.003)和透明质酸钠组(2.13±0.57 vs. 3.17±1.02,t = 4.67,P < 0.0001)。术后3个月和6个月,PRP凝胶组的Constant-Murley评分在统计学上高于PRP组和透明质酸钠组(P < 0.05)。术后6个月,肌肉骨骼超声显示PRP凝胶组和PRP组冈上肌的脂肪浸润低于透明质酸钠组(1.86±0.52 vs. 1.96±0.64 vs. 2.32±0.55,F = 5.06,P = 0.008)。此外,在这个时间点,PRP凝胶组患者的有效率显著高于PRP组或透明质酸钠组(93.10% vs. 80.77% vs. 66.67%,χ = 6.14,P = 0.