Suppr超能文献

结肠切除术后当日出院:一项配对队列研究。

Universal same-day discharge after colonic resection: a matched cohort study.

作者信息

Violante Tommaso, Ferrari Davide, Gomaa Ibrahim A, Novelli Marco, Larson David W, Shawki Sherief F

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02236-8.

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) have improved outcomes in colorectal surgery. Same-day discharge (SDD) after colonic resection is promising but often limited to highly selected patients. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a universal same-day discharge (USDD) program compared to traditional ERPs. The objective was to assess if USDD in a broader patient population is non-inferior to traditional ERP in terms of 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. This was a retrospective matched cohort study at a single U.S. institution that launched a USDD program in May 2022. Thirty-six patients in the USDD program were compared to a matched control group receiving traditional ERP. USDD eligibility criteria included outpatient agreement, minimally invasive approach, no new stoma, and caregiver availability. Main outcome measures were 30-day post-operative complications, ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations. The USDD group had shorter operative times, increased TAP block use, and lower intraoperative fluid administration. No significant differences were found in 30-day complications or reoperations between groups. However, ED visits and readmission rates were higher in the USDD group. USDD appears to be safe and non-inferior to traditional ERP for selected patients. SDD can potentially be safely expanded to a wider patient population, but further prospective studies are needed.

摘要

加速康复方案(ERPs)已改善了结直肠手术的预后。结肠切除术后当日出院(SDD)很有前景,但通常仅限于经过严格筛选的患者。本研究评估了通用当日出院(USDD)计划与传统ERPs相比的安全性和有效性。目的是评估在更广泛的患者群体中,USDD在30天并发症、再入院率和再次手术方面是否不劣于传统ERP。这是一项在美国一家机构进行的回顾性匹配队列研究,该机构于2022年5月启动了USDD计划。将USDD计划中的36名患者与接受传统ERP的匹配对照组进行比较。USDD的入选标准包括门诊协议、微创入路、无新造口以及有护理人员。主要结局指标为术后30天并发症、急诊就诊、再入院和再次手术。USDD组手术时间更短,腰方肌阻滞使用增加,术中液体输入量更低。两组在30天并发症或再次手术方面未发现显著差异。然而,USDD组的急诊就诊率和再入院率更高。对于选定的患者,USDD似乎是安全的且不劣于传统ERP。当日出院有可能安全地扩大到更广泛的患者群体,但需要进一步的前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验