• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术后抢救失败的相关危险因素。

Risk factors associated with failure to rescue after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

作者信息

Ramos-Fresnedo Andres, Mobley Erin M, Pather Keouna, Yap Chelsea R, Celso Brian G, Awad Ziad T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida, 655 8th Street S, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11949-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11949-1
PMID:40659946
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical factors associated with failure to rescue (FTR) among patients who underwent minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all adults (≥ 18 years) who underwent a MIE from September 2013 to September 2023. FTR was defined as mortality rate among patients who developed any postoperative complication (any Clavien-Dindo grade). Univariable logistic regression was used to determine which factors were associated with FTR and those significant at p < 0.05 were entered into a multivariable model. Additionally, a stratified analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with FTR among those patients who developed life-threatening complications (Clavien-Dindo 4).

RESULTS

A total of 282 consecutive patients underwent MIEs during the study period. Of these, 138 (49%) developed at least one complication and 11 (4%) were classified as FTR. On univariable analysis, patients > 75 years of age or with cardiac comorbidities were 4 times more likely (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.11-14.20, p = 0.033) and 4.7 times more likely (OR 4.70, 95% CI 1.19-18.58, p = 0.028) to experience FTR, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that age ≥ 75 years (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.76-10.75, p = 0.120) and cardiac comorbidities (OR 3.75, 95% CI 0.91-15.50, p = 0.061) were associated with increased odds of FTR. Additionally, stratified univariable analysis among patients who developed life-threatening complications (Clavien-Dindo 4) showed no association with FTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and cardiac comorbidities are risk factors associated with FTR in patients undergoing MIE. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative risk stratification and optimization, as well as patient-provider shared decision-making, to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. Further studies are needed to develop perioperative strategies to reduce the rates of failure to rescue and improve the overall survival of this population.

摘要

目的

探讨接受微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术(MIE)的患者中与抢救失败(FTR)相关的临床因素。

方法

对2013年9月至2023年9月期间接受MIE的所有成年人(≥18岁)进行回顾性分析。FTR定义为发生任何术后并发症(任何Clavien-Dindo分级)的患者的死亡率。采用单变量逻辑回归确定哪些因素与FTR相关,p<0.05的显著因素纳入多变量模型。此外,进行分层分析以探讨发生危及生命并发症(Clavien-Dindo 4级)的患者中与FTR相关的因素。

结果

在研究期间,共有282例连续患者接受了MIE。其中,138例(49%)发生了至少一种并发症,11例(4%)被归类为FTR。单变量分析显示,年龄>75岁或有心脏合并症的患者发生FTR的可能性分别高4倍(OR 3.98,95%CI 1.11-14.20,p=0.033)和4.7倍(OR 4.70,95%CI 1.19-18.58,p=0.028)。多变量分析显示,年龄≥75岁(OR 2.86,95%CI 0.76-10.75,p=0.120)和心脏合并症(OR 3.75,95%CI 0.91-15.50,p=0.061)与FTR几率增加相关。此外,对发生危及生命并发症(Clavien-Dindo 4级)的患者进行的分层单变量分析显示与FTR无关。

结论

年龄和心脏合并症是接受MIE的患者中与FTR相关的危险因素。这些发现强调了术前风险分层和优化以及医患共同决策以降低围手术期发病率和死亡率的重要性。需要进一步研究制定围手术期策略以降低抢救失败率并改善该人群的总体生存率。

相似文献

1
Risk factors associated with failure to rescue after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术后抢救失败的相关危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11949-1.
2
Impact of anastomotic leak vs pneumonia on failure to rescue after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.食管癌经胸切除术后吻合口漏与肺炎对未能挽救生命的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar;29(3):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101936. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
3
The impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on complications and mortality following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌Ivor Lewis食管切除术后房颤对并发症及死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06239-8.
4
Impact of preoperative diastolic dysfunction on short-term outcomes following robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).术前舒张功能障碍对机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)短期预后的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 1;19(1):442. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02624-7.
5
Failure to rescue in colon surgery.结肠手术中的抢救失败。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2025 Jul-Aug;40(4):101118. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101118. Epub 2025 Apr 6.
6
Comparison of double-layered scallop-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis in Ivor-Lewis surgery for esophageal and EGJ cancer: a retrospective cohort study.双层扇贝形吻合术与圆形吻合器吻合术在Ivor-Lewis食管癌和食管胃交界部癌手术中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1035. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14437-w.
7
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
8
National Analysis of Anastomotic Leak and Subsequent Failure to Rescue After Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后吻合口漏及后续抢救失败的全国性分析。
J Surg Res. 2025 Sep;313:177-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.013. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
9
Decreasing Complications After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy: Is a Totally Minimally Invasive Approach the Solution?降低Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术后并发症:完全微创方法是解决之道吗?
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;132(2):308-316. doi: 10.1002/jso.70011. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
10
Center case volume is associated with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined failure to rescue in cardiac surgery.中心病例量与心胸外科协会定义的心脏手术抢救失败有关。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;168(1):165-174.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of anastomotic leak vs pneumonia on failure to rescue after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.食管癌经胸切除术后吻合口漏与肺炎对未能挽救生命的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar;29(3):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101936. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Evaluating the perioperative risks in esophageal resection and reconstruction for esophageal carcinoma among elderly patients: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis.评估老年食管癌患者行食管切除重建术的围手术期风险:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;51(3):109542. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109542. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
3
Severe postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy reduce the long-term prognosis of well-immunonutrition patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
微创食管切除术后的严重并发症会降低局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌营养状况良好患者的长期预后。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2440622. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2440622. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
4
Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的临床应用。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7.
5
Postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy based on the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group guidelines: A single surgeon's 10-year experience at a single institution.基于食管并发症共识组指南的微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术后的手术结果:一位外科医生在单一机构的10年经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct;28(10):1709-1711. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.030. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
The anastomotic leak triad: preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes.吻合口漏三联征:术前患者特征、术中危险因素和术后结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct;28(10):1622-1628. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.020. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
7
Mortality and failure-to-rescue after esophagectomy in the procedure-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry.在以手术为目标的国家外科质量改进计划登记处,食管癌手术后的死亡率和救援失败率。
World J Surg. 2024 Sep;48(9):2235-2242. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12297. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Prognostic factors for patients with pathologic T1-T2N+ esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study with external validation.T1-T2N+ 期食管鳞癌患者的预后因素:一项回顾性研究及外部验证。
Surgery. 2024 Sep;176(3):730-738. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.026. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
9
Surgical outcomes of 500 robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies for esophageal carcinoma.500例机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术的手术结果
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):4745-4756. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-637. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
10
Association between frailty status and complications in patients undergoing surgical excision of malignant esophageal neoplasms.恶性食管肿瘤手术切除患者的虚弱状态与并发症之间的关联
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep-Oct;36(5):517-523. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0825. Epub 2023 Jul 25.