Suppr超能文献

双层扇贝形吻合术与圆形吻合器吻合术在Ivor-Lewis食管癌和食管胃交界部癌手术中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究

Comparison of double-layered scallop-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis in Ivor-Lewis surgery for esophageal and EGJ cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Li KunKun, Yang Qian, Wang YingJian, Zhang TaiMing, Zhang Liang, Chen Liang, Bao Tao, Guo Wei

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1035. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14437-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancers of the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are highly aggressive and have poor prognoses. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis surgery (MIIL) is the preferred treatment, but anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a critical complication of this procedure. In the present study, we introduce a novel double-layered scallop-shaped anastomosis (DLSSA) technique and compare its outcomes with those of circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis (CSEA).

METHODS

From April 2016 to February 2023, 117 patients with distal esophageal or EGJ cancer who underwent complete thoracoscopic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into DLSSA (n = 50) and CSEA (n = 67) groups. The median value and ranges are used to present the numerical data. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between groups with the Kruskal‒Wallis test and Fisher's exact test or χ2 test, respectively. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median total operation duration was similar between the groups (280 min). Intraoperative blood loss was slightly greater in the CSEA group (120 ml vs. 100 ml, p = 0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 32.5% of the patients, with no significant between-group difference. However, the incidence of AL was significantly lower (4.0% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.022) and that of pleural effusion was significantly greater (10.0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.039) in the DLSSA group than in the CSEA group. Multivariable analysis revealed that a higher body mass index (OR = 1.453, 95% CI: 1.119-1.888; p = 0.005) was a risk factor for AL, whereas undergoing DLSSA was associated with reduced AL risk (OR = 0.052, 95% CI: 0.005-0.525; p = 0.012), and both variables were considered independent predictors of AL risk.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CSEA, DLSSA was associated with significantly lower risk of AL in thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis surgery, demonstrating its potential as a safer anastomotic technique. However, its association with increased pleural effusion warrants further investigation. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate long-term outcomes and optimize procedural efficacy.

摘要

背景

食管下段癌和食管胃交界部(EGJ)癌具有高度侵袭性,预后较差。微创Ivor-Lewis手术(MIIL)是首选治疗方法,但吻合口漏(AL)仍然是该手术的关键并发症。在本研究中,我们介绍了一种新型双层扇形吻合术(DLSSA)技术,并将其结果与圆形吻合器食管胃吻合术(CSEA)的结果进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2016年4月至2023年2月期间117例行完全胸腔镜-腹腔镜Ivor-Lewis手术的食管下段或EGJ癌患者。患者分为DLSSA组(n = 50)和CSEA组(n = 67)。中位数和范围用于呈现数值数据。连续变量和分类变量分别采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Fisher精确检验或χ2检验进行组间比较。进行多变量二元逻辑回归分析以确定潜在的预后因素。

结果

两组的中位总手术时间相似(280分钟)。CSEA组术中失血量略多(120 ml对100 ml,p = 0.001)。32.5%的患者发生术后并发症,组间无显著差异。然而,DLSSA组的AL发生率显著低于CSEA组(4.0%对17.9%,p = 0.022),胸腔积液发生率显著高于CSEA组(10.0%对1.5%,p = 0.039)。多变量分析显示,较高的体重指数(OR = 1.453,95% CI:1.119 - 1.888;p = 0.005)是AL的危险因素,而接受DLSSA与降低AL风险相关(OR = 0.052,95% CI:0.005 - 0.525;p = 0.012),这两个变量均被视为AL风险的独立预测因素。

结论

与CSEA相比,DLSSA在胸腔镜Ivor-Lewis手术中与显著更低的AL风险相关,表明其作为一种更安全的吻合技术的潜力。然而,其与胸腔积液增加的关联值得进一步研究。需要进行前瞻性随机试验以验证长期结果并优化手术疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c31/12211163/d348f74d16f1/12885_2025_14437_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验