• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Hartmann手术与乙状结肠Hinchey III或IV级憩室炎的一期吻合术:一项全国性回顾性队列研究的倾向评分分析

Hartmann's procedure versus primary anastomosis for Hinchey III or IV sigmoid diverticulitis: a propensity score analysis of a retrospective national cohort study.

作者信息

Pellegrin Alexandra, Alves Arnaud, Beyer-Berjot Laura, Zerbib Philippe, Bridoux Valérie, Manceau Gilles, Panis Yves, Buscail Etienne, Venara Aurélien, Khaoudy Iman, Gaillard Martin, Ortega-Deballon Pablo, Thobie Alexandre, Menahem Benjamin, Eveno Clarisse, Bonnel Catherine, Mabrut Jean-Yves, Badic Bogdan, Godet Camille, Eid Yassine, Duchalais Emilie, Lakkis Zaher, Cotte Eddy, Laforest Anaïs, Desfourneaux Véronique, Maggiori Léon, Rebibo Lionel, Niki Christou, Talal Ali, Mege Diane, Bonnamy Cécile, Germain Adeline, Mauvais François, Tresallet Christophe, Roudie Jean, Laurent Alexis, Trilling Bertrand, Martin Bertrand, Massalou Damien, Romain Benoit, Tranchart Hadrien, Giger Urs, Ouaissi Mehdi, Briant Anaïs R, Parienti J J, Sabbagh Charles

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery Service, Amiens University Hospital, Rond point du Pr Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.

Department of Digestive Surgery, Digestive Cancer Registry of Calvados, "ANTICIPE" U1086 INSERM-UCN, Normandie University UNICAEN, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep;39(9):5676-5688. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11906-y. Epub 2025 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11906-y
PMID:40659954
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Primary anastomosis with a diverting stoma (PA) has been evaluated relative to Hartmann's procedure (HP) for Hinchey III/IV peritonitis in four randomized trials, all of which lacked power. We aimed to evaluate the safety of PA for this indication in real-life settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for Hinchey III/IV diverticulitis at 43 French centers from 2010 to 2021 were included in this retrospective multicenter study. The primary endpoint was the rate of severe complications at 90 days (Clavien-Dindo III-V). Secondary endpoints included the overall complication rate and stoma-free survival at one year. Two groups of patients (PA vs. HP) were created by propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

In total, 651 patients were included (112 with PA and 539 with HP). We matched 102 of the patients with PA with 102 patients who underwent HP. On day 90, there was no difference in the rate of severe complications (31% vs. 29%, p = 0.75) between these groups in subgroup analyses for Hinchey III (p = 0.99) or Hinchey IV (p = 0.35) diverticulitis. The percentages of patients with Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis did not differ significantly between the groups (SMD = 0.03). After inverse probability treatment weighting, mortality was significantly higher in the HP group than in the PA group (6% vs. 1%, p = 0.019). Stoma-free survival at one year was higher in the PA group (85% vs. 73%, p = 0.03). The reoperation rate at 90 days was higher in the PA group than in the HP group (unadjusted: 21% vs. 13%, p = 0.028; PSM: 21% vs. 7%, p = 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

PA did not increase the overall rate of complications. Conversely, it decreased mortality and the rate of definitive stomas in a large cohort of patients with Hinchey III/IV sigmoid diverticulitis.

摘要

引言

在四项随机试验中,已对原发性吻合术加转流造口术(PA)与哈特曼手术(HP)治疗欣奇 III/IV 级腹膜炎进行了评估,但所有这些试验的效能均不足。我们旨在评估在实际临床环境中 PA 用于该适应症的安全性。

患者与方法

纳入了 2010 年至 2021 年期间在法国 43 家中心因欣奇 III/IV 级憩室炎接受手术的患者,进行这项回顾性多中心研究。主要终点是 90 天时严重并发症的发生率(Clavien-Dindo III-V 级)。次要终点包括总体并发症发生率和一年时无造口生存率。通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)创建了两组患者(PA 组与 HP 组)。

结果

总共纳入了 651 例患者(112 例接受 PA,539 例接受 HP)。我们将 102 例接受 PA 的患者与 102 例接受 HP 的患者进行了匹配。在 90 天时,对于欣奇 III 级(p = 0.99)或欣奇 IV 级(p = 0.35)憩室炎的亚组分析中,两组之间严重并发症发生率无差异(31% 对 29%,p = 0.75)。两组中欣奇 III 级或 IV 级憩室炎患者的百分比无显著差异(标准化均值差 = 0.03)。在逆概率处理加权后,HP 组的死亡率显著高于 PA 组(6% 对 1%,p = 0.019)。PA 组一年时的无造口生存率更高(85% 对 73%,p = 0.03)。PA 组 90 天时的再次手术率高于 HP 组(未调整:21% 对 13%,p = 0.028;PSM:21% 对 7%,p = 0.007)。

结论

PA 并未增加总体并发症发生率。相反,在一大群欣奇 III/IV 级乙状结肠憩室炎患者中,它降低了死亡率和确定性造口的发生率。

相似文献

1
Hartmann's procedure versus primary anastomosis for Hinchey III or IV sigmoid diverticulitis: a propensity score analysis of a retrospective national cohort study.Hartmann手术与乙状结肠Hinchey III或IV级憩室炎的一期吻合术:一项全国性回顾性队列研究的倾向评分分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep;39(9):5676-5688. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11906-y. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗术与手术切除治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的急性憩室炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Feb;21(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1585-0. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.Hartmann 手术与一期吻合术治疗伴有脓性或粪便性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎(LADIES):一项多中心、平行组、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):599-610. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30174-8. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
4
Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 25;11(11):CD009277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2.
5
Treatment of Hinchey stage III-IV diverticulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hinchey Ⅲ-Ⅳ 期憩室炎的治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Apr;28(4):447-57. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1622-4. Epub 2012 Dec 15.
6
Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy vs. Hartmann's procedure for acute diverticulitis: what happens after discharge? Results of a nationwide analysis.一期吻合加预防性回肠造口术与 Hartmann 术式治疗急性憩室炎:出院后会发生什么?一项全国性分析的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2777-2787. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10752-8. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
7
Primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure in nonelective surgery for acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review.急性结肠憩室炎非选择性手术中一期切除吻合术与哈特曼手术的比较:一项系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jul;49(7):966-81. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0547-9.
8
Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature.急性复杂性憩室炎的切除与一期吻合术:文献系统综述
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Apr;22(4):351-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0059-4. Epub 2006 Jan 7.
9
Meta-analysis of surgical strategies in perforated left colonic diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis.左半结肠穿孔性憩室炎合并弥漫性腹膜炎手术策略的Meta分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Jun;403(4):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1686-x. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
10
Emergency Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy for Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalised Peritonitis: A Systematic Review.急诊腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎:一项系统评价
Dig Surg. 2016;33(1):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000441150. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage versus sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: three-year follow-up of the randomised LOLA trial.腹腔镜腹腔灌洗与乙状结肠切除术治疗伴有脓性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎:LOLA 试验的 3 年随访。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7764-7774. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09326-3. Epub 2022 May 23.
2
Long-term outcomes of Hartmann's procedure versus primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: follow-up of a prospective multicenter randomized trial (DIVERTI).Hartmann 手术与一期吻合术治疗穿孔性憩室炎致弥漫性腹膜炎的长期结局:前瞻性多中心随机试验(DIVERTI)的随访。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2159-2164. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03962-2. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
3
WSES Guidelines for the management of acute left sided colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting.WSES急诊环境下急性左侧结肠憩室炎管理指南
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 29;11:37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0095-0. eCollection 2016.
4
Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature.急性复杂性憩室炎的切除与一期吻合术:文献系统综述
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Apr;22(4):351-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0059-4. Epub 2006 Jan 7.
5
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.手术并发症的分类:一项在6336例患者队列中进行评估的新提议及一项调查结果
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.