• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量左氧氟沙星与单剂量磷霉素在尿动力学检查前预防尿路感染发生率的有效性比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of the effectiveness of single-dose levofloxacin with single-dose fosfomycin pre-urodynamic study related to the incidence of urinary tract infection: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Rahardjo Harrina Erlianti, Widia Fina, Wijaya Cindy, Leonardo Kevin, Tanjung Alfred, Arfiananda Muhammad Hanif, Fitriani Fatimah Nuwwaaridya, Siregar Rahmat Aidil Fajar, Afriansyah Andika

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Persahabatan Hospital - Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01839-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-025-01839-y
PMID:40660169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12257852/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of 500 mg levofloxacin and 3 g fosfomycin given as single-dose prophylactic antibiotics one hour before urodynamic studies (UDS) to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs).

METHODS

This single-blinded, randomized clinical trial included 126 patients who underwent UDS between December 2022 and March 2024 at two urology centers in Jakarta. The patients, aged 18 years and older, were randomized equally into two groups receiving either 500 mg levofloxacin or 3 g fosfomycin prior to UDS. The primary indications for UDS included lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) (54.8%), overactive bladder (OAB) (32.8%), underactive bladder (8.9%), and stress urinary incontinence (3.5%). Three days post-UDS, patients were followed up with urinalysis and clinical assessment for UTI symptoms.

RESULTS

Among the 126 patients, UTI was diagnosed in 26 cases (20.9%), with 14 cases (22.2%) in the levofloxacin group and 12 cases (19%) in the fosfomycin group, showing no significant difference ( = 0.660). Symptomatic UTIs occurred in 6 patients (4.8%) in the levofloxacin group and 7 patients (5.6%) in the fosfomycin group. E. coli was the most commonly detected bacterium in urine cultures.

CONCLUSION

In our center, there was no significant difference in the clinical outcome between the administration of 3 g fosfomycin and 500 mg levofloxacin as single-dose prophylactic antibiotics prior to UDS. Given the rising antibiotic resistance, fosfomycin may be considered an alternative. Further multicenter and multinational studies are warranted, as bacterial profiles and antibiotic resistance patterns may vary across different regions and healthcare systems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06017479.

STUDY REGISTRATION DATE

2023-08-24.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-025-01839-y.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在尿动力学检查(UDS)前1小时给予500毫克左氧氟沙星和3克磷霉素作为单剂量预防性抗生素预防尿路感染(UTI)的疗效。

方法

这项单盲随机临床试验纳入了2022年12月至2024年3月期间在雅加达的两个泌尿外科中心接受UDS检查的126例患者。年龄在18岁及以上的患者被随机平均分为两组,在UDS检查前分别接受500毫克左氧氟沙星或3克磷霉素。UDS的主要适应证包括下尿路症状(LUTS)(54.8%)、膀胱过度活动症(OAB)(32.8%)、膀胱活动低下(8.9%)和压力性尿失禁(3.5%)。UDS检查后3天,对患者进行尿液分析和UTI症状的临床评估随访。

结果

126例患者中,26例(20.9%)被诊断为UTI,其中左氧氟沙星组14例(22.2%),磷霉素组12例(19%),差异无统计学意义(=0.660)。左氧氟沙星组有6例患者(4.8%)发生有症状的UTI,磷霉素组有7例患者(5.6%)发生有症状的UTI。大肠杆菌是尿培养中最常检测到的细菌。

结论

在我们中心,UDS检查前给予3克磷霉素和500毫克左氧氟沙星作为单剂量预防性抗生素的临床结局无显著差异。鉴于抗生素耐药性不断上升,磷霉素可被视为一种替代药物。由于不同地区和医疗系统的细菌谱和抗生素耐药模式可能不同,有必要进行进一步的多中心和跨国研究。

试验注册

NCT06017479。

研究注册日期

2023-08-24。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12894-025-01839-y获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e1e/12257852/56420887b1f7/12894_2025_1839_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e1e/12257852/56420887b1f7/12894_2025_1839_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e1e/12257852/56420887b1f7/12894_2025_1839_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of single-dose levofloxacin with single-dose fosfomycin pre-urodynamic study related to the incidence of urinary tract infection: a randomized controlled trial.单剂量左氧氟沙星与单剂量磷霉素在尿动力学检查前预防尿路感染发生率的有效性比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01839-y.
2
Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections after urodynamic studies.预防性使用抗生素以降低尿动力学检查后尿路感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD008224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008224.pub2.
3
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pre-urodynamic Single-dose Levofloxacin with Post-urodynamic Levofloxacin for Three Days Related to the Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection: A Randomized Control Trial.术前单次左氧氟沙星与术后连续 3 天左氧氟沙星治疗预防尿动力学检查后尿路感染的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Urol J. 2023 May 21;20(3):167-172. doi: 10.22037/uj.v19i.7288.
4
Fosfomycin for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Men Undergoing a Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.磷霉素在经直肠前列腺活检男性中预防使用抗生素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 10;59(5):911. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050911.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Single-dose Fosfomycin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单剂量磷霉素治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的疗效与安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Midlife Health. 2025 Apr-Jun;16(2):124-136. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_77_24. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
6
Rediscovering the value of fosfomycin trometamol in the era of antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and expert opinion.重新发现磷霉素氨丁三醇在抗微生物药物耐药时代的价值:系统评价和专家意见。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Dec;62(6):106983. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106983. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
7
Comparing fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin for uncomplicated UTI treatment in adults: better bacterial eradication but non-significant clinical remission-a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较磷霉素和环丙沙星治疗成人单纯性尿路感染:细菌清除效果更好但临床缓解无显著差异——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04615-x.
8
Antibiotic duration for treating uncomplicated, symptomatic lower urinary tract infections in elderly women.老年女性单纯性、症状性下尿路感染的抗生素治疗疗程
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001535.
9
Antibiotics efficacy in clinical and microbiological cure of uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗生素治疗单纯性尿路感染的临床和微生物学疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 8;42(1):221. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04922-5.
10
Adding collagen, propolis plus quercetin, bacillus coagulans, hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate to D-mannose avoids symptoms and prevents recurrence in women with recurrent urinary tract infections: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.在D-甘露糖中添加胶原蛋白、蜂胶加槲皮素、凝结芽孢杆菌、透明质酸和硫酸软骨素可避免复发性尿路感染女性出现症状并预防复发:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2025 Jul;23(7):523-530. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2025.2487162. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Rediscovering the value of fosfomycin trometamol in the era of antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and expert opinion.重新发现磷霉素氨丁三醇在抗微生物药物耐药时代的价值:系统评价和专家意见。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Dec;62(6):106983. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106983. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
2
Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Uropathogenic : Mechanisms of Infection and Treatment Options.尿路感染的病原体:感染机制和治疗选择。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 23;24(13):10537. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310537.
3
Optimizing antibiotic use in Indonesia: A systematic review and evidence synthesis to inform opportunities for intervention.
优化印度尼西亚的抗生素使用:一项系统评价与证据综合,为干预机会提供信息。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2022 May 26;2:100013. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.05.002. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pre-urodynamic Single-dose Levofloxacin with Post-urodynamic Levofloxacin for Three Days Related to the Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection: A Randomized Control Trial.术前单次左氧氟沙星与术后连续 3 天左氧氟沙星治疗预防尿动力学检查后尿路感染的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Urol J. 2023 May 21;20(3):167-172. doi: 10.22037/uj.v19i.7288.
5
Prophylactic Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infections after Urodynamic Studies: A Meta-Analysis.尿动力学研究后预防性应用抗生素治疗尿路感染:荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 28;2021:6661588. doi: 10.1155/2021/6661588. eCollection 2021.
6
Antibiotic prophylaxis for urodynamic testing in women: a systematic review.女性尿动力学检查的抗生素预防:一项系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jan;32(1):27-38. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04501-3. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
7
Effective Treatment for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections with Oral Fosfomycin, Single Center Four Year Retrospective Study.口服磷霉素治疗单纯性尿路感染的有效性:单中心四年回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Aug 13;9(8):511. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9080511.
8
Comparison of single-dose fosfomycin tromethamine and other antibiotics for lower uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women and asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较单次剂量磷霉素氨丁三醇与其他抗生素治疗女性单纯性下尿路感染和孕妇无症状菌尿症的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):106018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106018. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Urinary Tract Infections among Indonesian Pregnant Women and Its Susceptibility Pattern.印度尼西亚孕妇尿路感染及其药敏模式。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr 21;2020:9681632. doi: 10.1155/2020/9681632. eCollection 2020.
10
Rate of urinary tract infection after urodynamic study in pelvic floor clinic.盆底诊所尿动力学检查后尿路感染的发生率。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2020 Winter;11(1):100-104. doi: 10.22088/cjim.11.1.100.