• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素治疗单纯性尿路感染的临床和微生物学疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Antibiotics efficacy in clinical and microbiological cure of uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Apr 8;42(1):221. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04922-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-04922-5
PMID:38587648
Abstract

PURPOSE

Fosfomycin has been used more frequently in managing uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to decreased compliance and increased multidrug-resistant bacteria. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of Fosfomycin compared to Nitrofurantoin, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and Ciprofloxacin in terms of clinical and microbiological cure alongside with other measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We included randomized control trials (RCTs) with uncomplicated UTI patients who received Fosfomycin, Nitrofurantoin, TMP-SMX, or Ciprofloxacin and reported the clinical or microbiological cure. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool to assess the included studies' quality. R-software was used for all statistical analysis. We ranked all antibiotics using the netrank function which yielded P scores. Frequentist network meta-analysis was used to assess the efficacy of all outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 13 RCTs with a total number of 3856 patients that showed Fosfomycin ranked the highest among the other antibiotics with respect to clinical cure (P-score = 0.99) and microbiological cure (P-score = 0.99) while Ciprofloxacin ranked the lowest (P-score = 0.11 and 0.02, respectively). Moreover, Ciprofloxacin yielded the highest relapse rate (P-score = 1), whereas TMP-SMX had the lowest relapse rate (P-score = 0.07). As for the adverse events, Ciprofloxacin demonstrated the highest adverse events as opposed to Fosfomycin (P-score = 0.98 and 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The network meta-analysis demonstrated that Fosfomycin is the most effective antibiotic in treating uncomplicated UTIs with respect to clinical cure, microbiological cure, and adverse events profile.

摘要

目的

由于顺应性降低和多药耐药菌增加,磷霉素在治疗单纯性尿路感染(UTI)中的应用越来越频繁。本网络荟萃分析的目的是评估磷霉素与呋喃妥因、复方磺胺甲噁唑(TMP-SMX)和环丙沙星在临床和微生物学治愈率方面的疗效,并结合其他指标进行评估。

材料和方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)。我们纳入了接受磷霉素、呋喃妥因、TMP-SMX 或环丙沙星治疗且报告临床或微生物学治愈率的单纯性 UTI 患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。R 软件用于所有统计分析。我们使用 netrank 函数对所有抗生素进行排名,得到 P 分数。我们使用频率网络荟萃分析评估所有结局的疗效。

结果

我们纳入了 13 项 RCT,共 3856 名患者,结果显示磷霉素在临床治愈率(P 分数=0.99)和微生物学治愈率(P 分数=0.99)方面优于其他抗生素,而环丙沙星排名最低(P 分数分别为 0.11 和 0.02)。此外,环丙沙星的复发率最高(P 分数=1),而 TMP-SMX 的复发率最低(P 分数=0.07)。至于不良反应,环丙沙星的不良反应发生率最高,而磷霉素的不良反应发生率最低(P 分数分别为 0.98 和 0.05)。

结论

网络荟萃分析表明,磷霉素是治疗单纯性尿路感染最有效的抗生素,在临床治愈率、微生物学治愈率和不良反应方面均有优势。

相似文献

1
Antibiotics efficacy in clinical and microbiological cure of uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗生素治疗单纯性尿路感染的临床和微生物学疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 8;42(1):221. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04922-5.
2
Efficacy and safety of quinolones vs. other antimicrobials for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.喹诺酮类药物与其他抗菌药物治疗成人单纯性尿路感染的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 May;33(5):1103-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05013-4. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
D-mannose for preventing and treating urinary tract infections.D-甘露糖防治尿路感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;8(8):CD013608. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013608.pub2.
6
Comparing fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin for uncomplicated UTI treatment in adults: better bacterial eradication but non-significant clinical remission-a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较磷霉素和环丙沙星治疗成人单纯性尿路感染:细菌清除效果更好但临床缓解无显著差异——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04615-x.
7
Prophylactic antibiotics for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者的预防性抗生素治疗:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD013198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013198.pub2.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy.择期子宫切除术的抗生素预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 18;6(6):CD004637. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin for uncomplicated UTI treatment in adults: better bacterial eradication but non-significant clinical remission-a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较磷霉素和环丙沙星治疗成人单纯性尿路感染:细菌清除效果更好但临床缓解无显著差异——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04615-x.
2
Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance for uncomplicated cystitis in 2023: Conducted by the Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation.2023年韩国泌尿生殖道感染与炎症协会开展的全国性单纯性膀胱炎抗菌药物耐药性监测。
Investig Clin Urol. 2025 Mar;66(2):161-171. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240302.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Single Dose of Fosfomycin Versus a Five-Day Course of Ciprofloxacin in Patients With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection.单剂量磷霉素与五日疗程环丙沙星治疗单纯性尿路感染患者的疗效比较
Cureus. 2022 May 9;14(5):e24843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24843. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Fosfomycin Vs Ciprofloxacin as Oral Step-Down Treatment for Escherichia coli Febrile Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial.磷霉素与环丙沙星对女性大肠埃希菌发热性尿路感染的口服降阶梯治疗:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、多中心试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 25;75(2):221-229. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab934.
3
Antimicrobial Resistance of for Uncomplicated Cystitis: Korean Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System.
单纯性膀胱炎的抗菌药物耐药性:韩国抗菌药物耐药性监测系统
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Nov 12;13(11):1075. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13111075.
4
Letter to the editor for the article "Antibiotics efficacy in clinical and microbiological cure of uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis".致编辑的信:关于文章《抗生素对单纯性尿路感染临床及微生物学治愈的疗效:系统评价与网状Meta分析》
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 24;42(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04998-z.
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fosfomycin versus nitrofurantoin for the treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI) in women - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
磷霉素与呋喃妥因治疗女性单纯性下尿路感染(UTI)的疗效和安全性评估——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Chemother. 2022 May;34(3):139-148. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2021.1938949. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Comparison of single-dose fosfomycin tromethamine and other antibiotics for lower uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women and asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较单次剂量磷霉素氨丁三醇与其他抗生素治疗女性单纯性下尿路感染和孕妇无症状菌尿症的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):106018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106018. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Antibiotic Resistance Among Uropathogenic .尿路致病性. 的抗生素耐药性
Pol J Microbiol. 2019 Dec;68(4):403-415. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2019-048. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
7
Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: a comparison of four antibiotics.女性单纯性尿路感染抗生素治疗的成本效益:四种抗生素的比较
BJGP Open. 2017 Oct 4;1(3):bjgpopen17X101097. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X101097.
8
Urinary Tract Infection Antibiotic Resistance in the United States.美国的尿路感染抗生素耐药性
Prim Care. 2018 Sep;45(3):455-466. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Effect of 5-Day Nitrofurantoin vs Single-Dose Fosfomycin on Clinical Resolution of Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infection in Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.呋喃妥因 5 天疗法与磷霉素单剂量疗法治疗女性单纯性下尿路感染临床缓解效果的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1781-1789. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3627.
10
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario.磷霉素治疗安大略省非复杂性尿路感染的成本效益分析
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2017;2017:6362804. doi: 10.1155/2017/6362804. Epub 2017 Feb 20.