• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞尔维亚卫生信息系统(HIS)2021 - 2024年改进情况:采用持续改进阶段(SOCI)方法的比较研究

Serbian Health Information System (HIS) improvements 2021-2024: comparison study using stages of continuous improvement (SOCI) methodology.

作者信息

Djikanovic Bosiljka, Kovacevic Milan, Smigic Isidora, Cvejic Marija, Nicic Emilija, Madevu-Matson Caitlin, Ollis Steve, Curcin Vasa, Barry Alimou, Watson-Grant Stephanie

机构信息

Institute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Subotica 8, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.

Centre - School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Subotica 8, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jul 14;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01337-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-025-01337-5
PMID:40660281
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Health Information System (HIS) in public healthcare services in Serbia was introduced in 2008, with the first comprehensive evaluation of its maturity conducted in 2021. Since then, several improvement initiatives have been implemented. This study aimed to assess the extent of HIS advancement between 2021 and 2024 and to identify both the desirable and realistic future maturity status.

METHODS

The maturity assessment of the Serbian HIS in 2024 was conducted using the same tool as in 2021: The Health Information Systems Stages of Continuous Improvement (SOCI), enabling direct comparison between the two periods. Progress was measured across five domains: Leadership and Governance, Management and Workforce, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Standards and Interoperability, and Data Quality and Use. These domains covered 13 components and 39 single subcomponents, with their maturity stages being assessed on a 5-point Likert scale on the basis of the opinions of key informants and documented through a desk review. Higher scores indicate a higher level of development. Along with a current assessment of maturity, key informants identified desired maturity levels for the future, using the same scale. Data were presented as comparisons in total scores per domain in 2024 versus 2021, for both current and projected statuses.

RESULTS

Between 2021 and 2024, the overall maturity of the Serbian HIS improved by nearly 1 point (from 1.6/5 to 2.5/5). The same difference of 0.9 was observed between the current 2024 status and the future desired status (2.5 versus 3.4). The most notable improvements were observed in the HIS Strategic Plan under Leadership and Governance (2.5-point increase) and Business Continuity under ICT Infrastructure (2-point increase). The primary driver of progress over the past 3 years was the adoption of the national Program for Digitalization in the Health System of Serbia (eHealth Strategy) and its corresponding Action Plan, which served as a development blueprint.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial progress in HIS maturity was achieved between 2021 and 2024, driven by strong governmental commitment, international donor support, and the engagement of dedicated national professionals. If current momentum and resourcing are sustained, the projected maturity levels are likely to be attainable in the near future.

摘要

背景

塞尔维亚公共医疗服务中的健康信息系统(HIS)于2008年引入,2021年对其成熟度进行了首次全面评估。从那时起,已实施了多项改进举措。本研究旨在评估2021年至2024年期间HIS的进步程度,并确定未来理想和现实的成熟度状态。

方法

2024年塞尔维亚HIS的成熟度评估使用了与2021年相同的工具:健康信息系统持续改进阶段(SOCI),从而能够对两个时期进行直接比较。在五个领域衡量进展:领导与治理、管理与劳动力、信息与通信技术(ICT)、标准与互操作性以及数据质量与使用。这些领域涵盖13个组件和39个单个子组件,根据关键信息提供者的意见,以5点李克特量表评估其成熟度阶段,并通过案头审查记录在案。分数越高表明发展水平越高。除了对当前成熟度进行评估外,关键信息提供者还使用相同的量表确定了未来所需的成熟度水平。数据以2024年与2021年各领域总分的比较形式呈现,包括当前状态和预测状态。

结果

2021年至2024年期间,塞尔维亚HIS的整体成熟度提高了近1分(从1.6/5提高到2.5/5)。2024年当前状态与未来期望状态之间也观察到相同的0.9分差异(2.5对3.4)。在领导与治理下的HIS战略计划(提高2.5分)以及ICT基础设施下的业务连续性(提高2分)方面观察到最显著的改进。过去3年取得进展的主要推动因素是塞尔维亚卫生系统数字化国家计划(电子健康战略)及其相应行动计划的采用,该计划充当了发展蓝图。

结论

在政府的坚定承诺、国际捐助者的支持以及敬业的国家专业人员的参与推动下,2021年至2024年期间HIS成熟度取得了实质性进展。如果保持当前的势头和资源投入,预计的成熟度水平在不久将来可能能够实现。

相似文献

1
Serbian Health Information System (HIS) improvements 2021-2024: comparison study using stages of continuous improvement (SOCI) methodology.塞尔维亚卫生信息系统(HIS)2021 - 2024年改进情况:采用持续改进阶段(SOCI)方法的比较研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jul 14;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01337-5.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.数字病理学与光学显微镜检查在组织病理学切片诊断中的内部及相互间差异:双盲交叉对比研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(30):1-75. doi: 10.3310/SPLK4325.
6
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Maturity Assessment of the Health Information System Using Stages of Continuous Improvement Methodology: Results From Serbia.利用持续改进方法学评估健康信息系统的成熟度:来自塞尔维亚的结果。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Oct 29;12(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00083.
2
Challenges in mapping European rare disease databases, relevant for ML-based screening technologies in terms of organizational, FAIR and legal principles: scoping review.绘制欧洲罕见病数据库图谱所面临的挑战,从组织、FAIR 和法律原则方面来看,这些挑战与基于机器学习的筛查技术相关:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 15;11:1214766. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1214766. eCollection 2023.
3
Pathways to improve health information systems in Ethiopia: current maturity status and implications.
改善埃塞俄比亚健康信息系统的途径:当前成熟度状况及影响。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 29;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00860-z.
4
Towards a global strategy on digital health.迈向数字健康全球战略。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):231-231A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.253955.