Suppr超能文献

下肢缺血预处理能否改善健康成年人的有氧运动能力?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Can lower limb ischemic preconditioning improve aerobic capacity in healthy adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhou Limingfei, Gan Jianyu, Tan Yineng, Zhang Yundi, Bao Dapeng, Zhou Junhong

机构信息

School of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2025 Jan 1;50:1-18. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2024-0456.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of lower limb ischemic preconditioning (IPC/LL) on aerobic capacity in healthy adults. The search was conducted in five electronic databases. Two authors independently reviewed the search results, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to determine the overall effect size and the impact of potential moderators. Twenty publications consisting of 297 participants were included. The overall analysis showed that time to exhaustion was significantly improved after IPC/LL intervention compared with the control (Hedges'  = 0.40, 95% CI (0.16, 0.64),  < 0.01). In subgroup analysis, time to exhaustion was significantly improved only in single-pass intervention conditions, in untrained participants, and assessed by cycling exercise tests ( < 0.05). However, no significant effect was observed on time trial performance (Hedges' = -0.08, 95% CI (-0.33, 0.16),  = 0.50), peak oxygen uptake (Hedges'  = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.17, 0.21),  = 0.85), and blood lactate (Hedges'  = 0.09, 95% CI (-0.06, 0.23),  = 0.26) in healthy adults after IPC/LL intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that IPC/LL does not improve the aerobic capacity of healthy adults but contributes to an enhancement in time to exhaustion during aerobic exercise.

摘要

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究下肢缺血预处理(IPC/LL)对健康成年人有氧能力的影响。检索了五个电子数据库。两位作者独立审查检索结果、提取数据,并评估偏倚风险和证据确定性。进行荟萃分析和亚组分析以确定总体效应大小和潜在调节因素的影响。纳入了20篇包含297名参与者的出版物。总体分析表明,与对照组相比,IPC/LL干预后力竭时间显著改善(Hedges' = 0.40,95%CI(0.16,0.64),P < 0.01)。亚组分析中,仅在单次通过干预条件下、未受过训练的参与者中以及通过自行车运动试验评估时,力竭时间显著改善(P < 0.05)。然而,在IPC/LL干预后的健康成年人中,计时赛成绩(Hedges' = -0.08,95%CI(-0.33,0.16),P = 0.50)、最大摄氧量(Hedges' = 0.02,95%CI(-0.17,0.21),P = 0.85)和血乳酸(Hedges' = 0.09,95%CI(-0.06,0.23),P = 0.26)方面未观察到显著影响。本系统评价和荟萃分析提供了中等证据,表明IPC/LL并不能提高健康成年人的有氧能力,但有助于延长有氧运动中的力竭时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验