Ayanoglu Esra, Tekin Arzu Bilge, Birol Ilter Pınar, Mutlu Memiş Ali, Yassa Murat, Kaya Cihan, Tug Niyazi
Ceska Gynekol. 2025;90(3):194-203. doi: 10.48095/cccg2025194.
This study aimed to assess the reliability and educational value of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy videos on YouTube and their suitability for training surgeons.
On June 12, 2024, YouTube was searched using the keywords "vNOTES hysterectomy," "TVNOTES hysterectomy," "transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy," "vNOTES," and "vaginal notes hysterectomy." A total of 73 videos met the inclusion criteria. Viewer engagement metrics, such as time since upload, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video duration were recorded. Ratios such as a view ratio, a like ratio, and Video Power Index (VPI) were calculated. The videos were categorized by the modified Global Quality Scale (GQS) and evaluated based on a scoring system derived from a standardized 10-step vNOTES hysterectomy procedure, with scores ranging from 0 to 15.
Out of 73 videos, 40 (53.8%) were categorized as poor quality, 13 (17.8%) as moderate, and 20 (27.4%) as good. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of time since upload, views, dislikes, comments, or a like ratio. However, videos in the good-quality group had a significantly higher number of likes and VPI scores. Critical elements such as patient preparation and positioning, setup of the operation room, circumcision of the cervix, and vault closure were inadequately addressed in lower-quality videos. Videos with a didactic voice had significantly more views, likes, and comments than those with music or no sound. No significant correlations were found between video length and engagement metrics.
The majority of vNOTES hysterectomy videos (53.8%) on YouTube lack comprehensive educational content, with only a small fraction deemed appropriate for surgical training. The interest rates of the viewers may not be correlated with the usefulness rates of the videos. Surgeons and organizations should focus on producing high-quality, peer-reviewed instructional videos to improve the educational value of YouTube as a resource.
本研究旨在评估YouTube上阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)子宫切除术视频的可靠性、教育价值及其对培训外科医生的适用性。
2024年6月12日,在YouTube上使用关键词“vNOTES子宫切除术”“TVNOTES子宫切除术”“经阴道自然腔道内镜子宫切除术”“vNOTES”和“阴道NOTES子宫切除术”进行搜索。共有73个视频符合纳入标准。记录观看者参与度指标,如上传时间、观看次数、点赞数、点踩数、评论数和视频时长。计算观看率、点赞率和视频影响力指数(VPI)等比率。根据改良的全球质量量表(GQS)对视频进行分类,并基于标准化的10步vNOTES子宫切除术程序得出的评分系统进行评估,分数范围为0至15分。
在73个视频中,40个(53.8%)被归类为质量差,13个(17.8%)为中等质量,20个(27.4%)为高质量。在上传时间、观看次数、点踩数、评论数或点赞率方面,各组之间未发现显著差异。然而,高质量组的视频点赞数和VPI得分显著更高。低质量视频中,患者准备与体位、手术室设置、宫颈环切术和阴道穹窿关闭等关键要素未得到充分体现。有讲解声音的视频的观看次数、点赞数和评论数明显多于有音乐或无声音的视频。视频长度与参与度指标之间未发现显著相关性。
YouTube上大多数vNOTES子宫切除术视频(53.8%)缺乏全面的教育内容,只有一小部分被认为适合手术培训。观看者的兴趣率可能与视频的有用率无关。外科医生和相关组织应专注于制作高质量、经过同行评审的教学视频,以提高YouTube作为一种资源的教育价值。