• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的学习:在临床教育初期失败后促进护生临床能力发展——一项扎根理论研究

Person-Centred Learning: Enabling Development of Clinical Competence in Nursing Students Following Initial Failure During Clinical Education-A Grounded Theory Study.

作者信息

Löfgren Ulrika, Wälivaara Britt-Marie, Strömbäck Ulrica, Lindberg Birgitta

机构信息

Institution of Health, Education and Technology, Division of Nursing Science and Medical Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1111/jan.70080.

DOI:10.1111/jan.70080
PMID:40664358
Abstract

AIM

To explore the learning processes and prerequisites for nursing students to develop and achieve passing clinical competence, following an initial failing grade in their clinical education.

DESIGN

A constructivist grounded theory study was employed.

METHODS

Data were collected between January 2022 and June 2024 through individual interviews with seven undergraduate nursing students retaking their clinical education in the final semester at a university in Sweden. In addition, individual interviews were conducted with four teachers in higher education and two focus group discussions, one with four teachers in higher education and another with a clinical teacher and a supervisor. The data analysis was conducted using an iterative process of constant comparison of data in different phases.

RESULTS

The analysis resulted in a theoretical model of person-centred learning which illustrates nursing students' learning processes and the prerequisites for them to develop and achieve clinical competence in clinical education. The model's core learning processes involve tailoring clinical education to students' needs: acknowledging one's own learning needs, receiving supervision which addresses their specific needs and having an educational institution which meets these needs are the three main learning processes that define student development. Students' acknowledgement of their personal learning needs itself entails three learning processes: trusting one's own knowledge, reflecting on and applying the nursing process, and reflecting on one's own learning. For students to progress in the learning process, prerequisites related to supervision and an educational institution meeting the students' needs must be in place.

CONCLUSION

The study provides evidence for a person-centred model which promotes nursing students' learning and development of clinical competence during clinical practice at the end of their nursing education.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION

This model can provide support to coordinators and supervisors in nursing education with regard to planning and implementing clinical education.

IMPACT

This grounded theory study provides a theoretical model for nursing students' learning and development of clinical competence during their clinical education in their final year of nursing education. A person-centred learning approach in clinical education can provide learning prerequisites for students to successfully achieve learning objectives and develop safe competences for the profession. The findings of the study can offer valuable support and direction to nursing students, educators, and clinical practice supervisors in the planning and implementation of clinical education.

REPORTING METHOD

The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist and the Guideline for Reporting and Evaluating Grounded Theory Research Studies (GUREGT).

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

This study did not include patient or public involvement.

摘要

目的

探讨护理专业学生在临床教育中首次成绩不及格后,培养并达到及格临床能力的学习过程和前提条件。

设计

采用建构主义扎根理论研究。

方法

2022年1月至2024年6月期间,通过对瑞典一所大学最后一学期重修临床教育的七名本科护理专业学生进行个人访谈收集数据。此外,还对四名高等教育教师进行了个人访谈,并组织了两次焦点小组讨论,一次是与四名高等教育教师,另一次是与一名临床教师和一名督导员。数据分析采用不同阶段数据持续比较的迭代过程。

结果

分析得出了一个以人为主导的学习理论模型,该模型阐述了护理专业学生的学习过程以及他们在临床教育中培养并达到临床能力的前提条件。该模型的核心学习过程包括根据学生需求调整临床教育:认识到自己的学习需求、接受满足其特定需求的督导以及拥有满足这些需求的教育机构是界定学生发展的三个主要学习过程。学生对自身个人学习需求的认识本身包含三个学习过程:信任自己的知识、反思并应用护理程序以及反思自己的学习。为使学生在学习过程中取得进步,必须具备与督导以及满足学生需求的教育机构相关的前提条件。

结论

该研究为以人为主导的模型提供了证据,该模型在护理教育末期的临床实践中促进护理专业学生的学习和临床能力发展。

对该行业的启示

该模型可为护理教育中的协调员和督导员在规划和实施临床教育方面提供支持。

影响

这项扎根理论研究为护理专业学生在护理教育最后一年的临床教育中学习和发展临床能力提供了一个理论模型。临床教育中以人为主导的学习方法可为学生成功实现学习目标并培养该行业的安全能力提供学习前提条件。该研究结果可为护理专业学生、教育工作者和临床实践督导员在规划和实施临床教育方面提供宝贵的支持和指导。

报告方法

该研究遵循定性研究报告统一标准(COREQ)清单以及扎根理论研究报告与评估指南(GUREGT)。

未涉及患者或公众参与

本研究未纳入患者或公众参与。

相似文献

1
Person-Centred Learning: Enabling Development of Clinical Competence in Nursing Students Following Initial Failure During Clinical Education-A Grounded Theory Study.以患者为中心的学习:在临床教育初期失败后促进护生临床能力发展——一项扎根理论研究
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1111/jan.70080.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
5
Autistic Students' Experiences of Employment and Employability Support while Studying at a UK University.自闭症学生在英国大学学习期间的就业经历及就业支持情况
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):212-222. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0112. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
8
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
9
Neonatal Nurses' Understanding of the Factors That Enhance and Hinder Early Communication Between Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Narrative Inquiry Study.新生儿护士对促进和阻碍早产儿与其父母早期沟通因素的理解:一项叙事探究研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70093.
10
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.