Ge Le, Zu Yao, Li Zhicheng, Li Xin, Huang Huanjie, Li Yan, Gao Xiaoyu, Chen Xi, Yu Qiuhua, Wang Chuhuai
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2025 Jul 15;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s11556-025-00378-7.
Previous studies showed that the difficulty levels of posture and cognitive tasks and pain could interactively modulate the brain oscillations. Older adults with low back pain (LBP) have poorer postural control than healthy older adults under dual-task conditions. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate alterations in brain activation during dual tasks in older people with LBP.
This cross-sectional study involved older participants with LBP (n = 21) and healthy older adults (n = 18) without a history of LBP. Electroencephalogram data and balance performance data were recorded simultaneously during dual and single tasks that required the participants to maintain stability in posture tasks with or without a concurrent cognitive task. The posture tasks had two levels of difficulty: a two-leg stance and one-leg stance. Cognitive tasks involved three levels of difficulty: no-cognition tasks, counting tasks, and arithmetic tasks. Brain activities were assessed using the power spectral density (PSD) of alpha-, beta-, and theta-band power rhythms within three regions of interest including the frontal, central, and parietal regions of the brain.
A repeated-measures analysis of variance (2 postural tasks × 3 cognitive tasks × 2 groups) was used to test balance performance, cognitive performance and brain activities under different task conditions between the two groups. Compare to controls, LBP participants showed poorer performance in postural tasks (reflected by larger COP parameters) and cognitive tasks (reflected by lower accuracy rates) regardless of task difficulty level (p < 0.05). LBP participants showed larger COP parameters in the dual task with high and low cognitive difficulties than those in single task (p < 0.05), which was not observed in control group. The theta band power of control group was higher during one-leg stance than during two-leg stance in frontocentral regions (p < 0.05), which was not observed in LBP group. The LBP group showed greater beta-band power in the frontal regions than the control group in all conditions(p < 0.05). Correlations between COP parameters and theta band power in frontal regions were significant in dual task or one-leg stance(p < 0.05).
In older people with LBP, the brain oscillations as assessed on the PSD of beta and theta power rhythms is changed under the dual-task condition compared with control group. Cognitive and postural difficulty levels could modulate theta band power in frontal region, which subsequently affected the balance performance in older people with LBP.
先前的研究表明,姿势和认知任务的难度水平以及疼痛可交互调节脑振荡。在双任务条件下,患有下腰痛(LBP)的老年人比健康老年人的姿势控制能力更差。然而,其潜在机制仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在调查患有LBP的老年人在双任务期间大脑激活的变化。
这项横断面研究纳入了患有LBP的老年参与者(n = 21)和无LBP病史的健康老年人(n = 18)。在双任务和单任务期间同时记录脑电图数据和平衡性能数据,这些任务要求参与者在有或没有并发认知任务的情况下保持姿势任务的稳定性。姿势任务有两个难度级别:双腿站立和单腿站立。认知任务涉及三个难度级别:无认知任务、计数任务和算术任务。使用包括大脑额叶、中央和顶叶区域在内的三个感兴趣区域内的α、β和θ波段功率节律的功率谱密度(PSD)来评估大脑活动。
采用重复测量方差分析(2种姿势任务×3种认知任务×2组)来测试两组在不同任务条件下的平衡性能、认知性能和大脑活动。与对照组相比,无论任务难度水平如何,LBP参与者在姿势任务(以较大的COP参数反映)和认知任务(以较低的准确率反映)中的表现均较差(p < 0.05)。与单任务相比,LBP参与者在高认知难度和低认知难度的双任务中表现出更大的COP参数(p < 0.05),而对照组未观察到这种情况。在额中央区域,对照组单腿站立时的θ波段功率高于双腿站立时(p < 0.05),LBP组未观察到这种情况。在所有条件下,LBP组额叶区域的β波段功率均高于对照组(p < 0.05)。在双任务或单腿站立时,额区COP参数与θ波段功率之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.05)。
与对照组相比,在双任务条件下患有LBP的老年人中,通过β和θ功率节律的PSD评估的脑振荡发生了变化。认知和姿势难度水平可调节额叶区域的θ波段功率,进而影响患有LBP的老年人的平衡性能。