Lee Wonhee, Yu Woojin, Lee HwaYong, Kim Guk Bae, Jeon In-Ho, Koh Kyoung Hwan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Orthop Res. 2025 Oct;43(10):1695-1704. doi: 10.1002/jor.70023. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty has been used to translate preoperative surgical planning into precise implant positioning. However, screws for baseplate fixation using PSI have not been preoperatively planned or verified for proper location and length. This study aims to assess the reproducibility of the 3D-printed PSI system for baseplate and screw positioning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and the role of preoperative screw planning. Postoperative CT data from 30 patients who underwent primary rTSA using PSI were collected. After ideal position planning of the baseplate and screws, a PSI guide was 3D-printed. Postoperative CT evaluated baseplate version, inclination, and translation. Screw length, insertion angle, and potential penetration of the spinoglenoid and suprascapular notch were investigated. The mean differences between planned and actual implantation were 2.7° ± 5.8° for version, 0.9° ± 3.5° for inclination, and 1.0° ± 5.4° for rotation. The mean translation difference was 1.7 ± 1.0 mm. The mean screw angulation differences were -0.5° ± 6.4° anteroposteriorly and -1.4° ± 7.1° superior-inferiorly. There was no risk of nerve injury from suprascapular notch involvement because it was considered that the screw was positioned away from the nerve path. The posterior screw was abandoned in 93.3% of patients due to proximity to the suprascapular nerve or insufficient length for bone purchase (mean length: 9.3 ± 2.0 mm). Using PSI, the reproducibility of baseplate and screw placement in rTSA was confirmed. The posterior screw has a limited role due to its length and direction constraints. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Preoperative planning and PSI enable precise surgery, including proper screw insertion and baseplate positioning.
肩关节置换术中的患者特异性器械(PSI)已被用于将术前手术规划转化为精确的植入物定位。然而,使用PSI进行基板固定的螺钉在术前并未针对其正确位置和长度进行规划或验证。本研究旨在评估3D打印的PSI系统在反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)中用于基板和螺钉定位的可重复性以及术前螺钉规划的作用。收集了30例使用PSI进行初次rTSA患者的术后CT数据。在对基板和螺钉进行理想位置规划后,3D打印了一个PSI导向器。术后CT评估了基板的版本、倾斜度和平移情况。研究了螺钉长度、插入角度以及螺钉穿入肩胛冈切迹和肩胛上切迹的可能性。计划植入与实际植入之间的平均差异为:版本差异2.7°±5.8°,倾斜度差异0.9°±3.5°,旋转差异1.0°±5.4°。平均平移差异为1.7±1.0mm。螺钉角度的平均差异为前后方向-0.5°±6.4°,上下方向-1.4°±7.1°。由于认为螺钉位置远离神经路径,因此不存在因肩胛上切迹受累而导致神经损伤的风险。93.3%的患者因靠近肩胛上神经或骨购买长度不足(平均长度:9.3±2.0mm)而放弃了后置螺钉。使用PSI,证实了rTSA中基板和螺钉放置的可重复性。后置螺钉由于其长度和方向限制,作用有限。临床意义:术前规划和PSI可实现精确手术,包括正确的螺钉插入和基板定位。