Mourad Wassim, Wiater J Michael, Wiater Brett P, Martusiewicz Alexander
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Oakland University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 3535 West Thirteen Mile Road, Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Dec;13(6):769-775. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09677-1.
Baseplate fixation has been known to be the weak link in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). A wide variety of different baseplates options are currently available. This review investigates the recent literature to present the reader with an overview of the currently available baseplate options and modes of fixation.
The main elements that differentiate baseplates are the central fixation element, the size of the baseplate, the shape, the backside geometry, whether or not an offset central fixation exists, the number of peripheral screws, and the availability of peripheral augmentation. The wide array of baseplate options indicates that no particular design has proven superiority. As such, surgeons should be aware of their options and choose an implant that the surgeon is comfortable with and one that best suits the individual patient anatomy. With the growing number of RTSA procedures and registries with long-term follow-up, future investigations will hopefully delineate the ideal baseplate design to optimize survivorship.
已知在反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)中,基板固定是薄弱环节。目前有各种各样不同的基板可供选择。本综述研究了近期文献,向读者概述当前可用的基板选项和固定方式。
区分基板的主要因素包括中央固定元件、基板尺寸、形状、背面几何形状、是否存在偏心中央固定、周边螺钉数量以及周边增强的可用性。基板选项众多表明没有哪种特定设计已被证明具有优越性。因此,外科医生应了解他们的选项,并选择一种自己操作起来得心应手且最适合个体患者解剖结构的植入物。随着RTSA手术数量的增加以及有长期随访的登记系统的出现,未来的研究有望确定理想的基板设计以优化假体生存率。