Sharif Faiza, Ahmad Ashfaq, Gilani Syed Amir, Mahmood Dania
University Institute of Physical Therapy, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jul 1;5:1263295. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1263295. eCollection 2024.
This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing body of evidence and provide a comprehensive analysis of the effects of dry needling, isometric, and eccentric exercises on pain severity and functional impairment in individuals diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy. The review was conducted in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, PEDro, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for relevant literature from 2010 to August 2022. The therapeutic effects of dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises on patellar tendinopathy were critically assessed. The risk of bias was determined using the McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies, while the level of evidence and recommendation grades were assigned based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. The primary outcomes of interest were pain severity and functional impairment, particularly among elite volleyball and basketball athletes suffering from patellar tendinopathy. The systematic review incorporated nine clinical trials, including two on dry needling, four on isometric exercises, and three on eccentric exercises. The quality of the included studies ranged from 70% to 93%, as evaluated through the McMaster Critical Review Form. The two dry needling trials were deemed to be of high quality (93%), while the four isometric trials were classified as moderate quality (75%). Similarly, the three trials on eccentric exercises were rated at an average of 78%, indicating moderate quality. Of the nine trials, six were randomized controlled trials, with a 1B level of evidence (Grade A recommendation), while three trials, comprising two cross-over trials and one controlled clinical trial, were categorized as 2B evidence (Grade B recommendation). The findings from this review suggest that dry needling and eccentric exercises are more effective for long-term pain reduction and improvement in knee function, whereas isometric exercises appear to provide greater benefit for short-term pain relief, particularly during athletic activity. Although physical therapy-based interventions show promise for sustained management, the limited data underscores the need for further high-quality research in this domain.
www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42022360057, identifier (CRD42022360057).
本系统评价旨在评估现有证据,并对干针疗法、等长运动和离心运动对被诊断为髌腱炎的个体的疼痛严重程度和功能障碍的影响进行全面分析。该评价严格按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。对包括Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、PEDro和谷歌学术在内的数据库进行系统检索,以查找2010年至2022年8月的相关文献。对干针疗法、等长运动和离心运动对髌腱炎的治疗效果进行了严格评估。使用麦克马斯特定量研究批判性评价表确定偏倚风险,同时根据牛津循证医学中心指南确定证据水平和推荐等级。主要关注的结果是疼痛严重程度和功能障碍,特别是在患有髌腱炎的精英排球和篮球运动员中。该系统评价纳入了9项临床试验,包括2项关于干针疗法的试验、4项关于等长运动的试验和3项关于离心运动的试验。通过麦克马斯特批判性评价表评估,纳入研究的质量在70%至93%之间。两项干针疗法试验被认为质量高(93%),而四项等长运动试验被归类为中等质量(75%)。同样,三项离心运动试验的平均评分是78%,表明质量中等。在这9项试验中,6项是随机对照试验,证据水平为1B级(A级推荐),而三项试验,包括两项交叉试验和一项对照临床试验,被归类为2B级证据(B级推荐)。该评价的结果表明,干针疗法和离心运动在长期减轻疼痛和改善膝关节功能方面更有效,而异等长运动似乎在短期缓解疼痛方面提供更大益处,特别是在运动活动期间。虽然基于物理治疗的干预措施显示出持续管理的前景,但有限的数据强调了在该领域进行进一步高质量研究的必要性。
www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42022360057,标识符(CRD42022360057)。