van der Heijden Rianne A, Lankhorst Nienke E, van Linschoten Robbart, Bierma-Zeinstra Sita M A, van Middelkoop Marienke
Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Burg Jacobplein 51, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015CA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 20;1(1):CD010387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010387.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee problem, which particularly affects adolescents and young adults. PFPS, which is characterised by retropatellar (behind the kneecap) or peripatellar (around the kneecap) pain, is often referred to as anterior knee pain. The pain mostly occurs when load is put on the knee extensor mechanism when climbing stairs, squatting, running, cycling or sitting with flexed knees. Exercise therapy is often prescribed for this condition. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of exercise therapy aimed at reducing knee pain and improving knee function for people with patellofemoral pain syndrome. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (May 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2014, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1946 to May 2014), EMBASE (1980 to 2014 Week 20), PEDro (to June 2014), CINAHL (1982 to May 2014) and AMED (1985 to May 2014), trial registers (to June 2014) and conference abstracts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the effect of exercise therapy on pain, function and recovery in adolescents and adults with patellofemoral pain syndrome. We included comparisons of exercise therapy versus control (e.g. no treatment) or versus another non-surgical therapy; or of different exercises or exercise programmes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials based on pre-defined inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where appropriate, we pooled data using either fixed-effect or random-effects methods. We selected the following seven outcomes for summarising the available evidence: pain during activity (short-term: ≤ 3 months); usual pain (short-term); pain during activity (long-term: > 3 months); usual pain (long-term); functional ability (short-term); functional ability (long-term); and recovery (long-term). MAIN RESULTS: In total, 31 heterogeneous trials including 1690 participants with patellofemoral pain are included in this review. There was considerable between-study variation in patient characteristics (e.g. activity level) and diagnostic criteria for study inclusion (e.g. minimum duration of symptoms) and exercise therapy. Eight trials, six of which were quasi-randomised, were at high risk of selection bias. We assessed most trials as being at high risk of performance bias and detection bias, which resulted from lack of blinding.The included studies, some of which contributed to more than one comparison, provided evidence for the following comparisons: exercise therapy versus control (10 trials); exercise therapy versus other conservative interventions (e.g. taping; eight trials evaluating different interventions); and different exercises or exercise programmes. The latter group comprised: supervised versus home exercises (two trials); closed kinetic chain (KC) versus open KC exercises (four trials); variants of closed KC exercises (two trials making different comparisons); other comparisons of other types of KC or miscellaneous exercises (five trials evaluating different interventions); hip and knee versus knee exercises (seven trials); hip versus knee exercises (two studies); and high- versus low-intensity exercises (one study). There were no trials testing exercise medium (land versus water) or duration of exercises. Where available, the evidence for each of seven main outcomes for all comparisons was of very low quality, generally due to serious flaws in design and small numbers of participants. This means that we are very unsure about the estimates. The evidence for the two largest comparisons is summarised here. Exercise versus control. Pooled data from five studies (375 participants) for pain during activity (short-term) favoured exercise therapy: mean difference (MD) -1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.39 to -0.54. The CI included the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.3 (scale 0 to 10), indicating the possibility of a clinically important reduction in pain. The same finding applied for usual pain (short-term; two studies, 41 participants), pain during activity (long-term; two studies, 180 participants) and usual pain (long-term; one study, 94 participants). Pooled data from seven studies (483 participants) for functional ability (short-term) also favoured exercise therapy; standardised mean difference (SMD) 1.10, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.63. Re-expressed in terms of the Anterior Knee Pain Score (AKPS; 0 to 100), this result (estimated MD 12.21 higher, 95% CI 6.44 to 18.09 higher) included the MCID of 10.0, indicating the possibility of a clinically important improvement in function. The same finding applied for functional ability (long-term; three studies, 274 participants). Pooled data (two studies, 166 participants) indicated that, based on the 'recovery' of 250 per 1000 in the control group, 88 more (95% CI 2 fewer to 210 more) participants per 1000 recovered in the long term (12 months) as a result of exercise therapy. Hip plus knee versus knee exercises. Pooled data from three studies (104 participants) for pain during activity (short-term) favoured hip and knee exercise: MD -2.20, 95% CI -3.80 to -0.60; the CI included a clinically important effect. The same applied for usual pain (short-term; two studies, 46 participants). One study (49 participants) found a clinically important reduction in pain during activity (long-term) for hip and knee exercise. Although tending to favour hip and knee exercises, the evidence for functional ability (short-term; four studies, 174 participants; and long-term; two studies, 78 participants) and recovery (one study, 29 participants) did not show that either approach was superior. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review has found very low quality but consistent evidence that exercise therapy for PFPS may result in clinically important reduction in pain and improvement in functional ability, as well as enhancing long-term recovery. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the best form of exercise therapy and it is unknown whether this result would apply to all people with PFPS. There is some very low quality evidence that hip plus knee exercises may be more effective in reducing pain than knee exercise alone.Further randomised trials are warranted but in order to optimise research effort and engender the large multicentre randomised trials that are required to inform practice, these should be preceded by research that aims to identify priority questions and attain agreement and, where practical, standardisation regarding diagnostic criteria and measurement of outcome.
背景:髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)是一种常见的膝关节问题,尤其影响青少年和年轻人。PFPS的特征是髌后(膝盖骨后方)或髌周(膝盖骨周围)疼痛,常被称为膝前疼痛。疼痛大多在爬楼梯、下蹲、跑步、骑自行车或屈膝而坐时膝关节伸肌机制承受负荷时出现。针对这种情况通常会开具运动疗法。 目的:评估旨在减轻髌股疼痛综合征患者膝关节疼痛并改善膝关节功能的运动疗法的效果(益处和危害)。 检索方法:我们检索了Cochrane骨、关节和肌肉创伤小组专业注册库(2014年5月)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(2014年第4期)、MEDLINE(1946年至2014年5月)、EMBASE(1980年至2014年第20周)、PEDro(至2014年6月)、CINAHL(1982年至2014年5月)和AMED(1985年至2014年5月)、试验注册库(至2014年6月)以及会议摘要。 入选标准:评估运动疗法对患有髌股疼痛综合征的青少年和成年人疼痛、功能及恢复情况影响的随机和半随机试验。我们纳入了运动疗法与对照(如不治疗)或与另一种非手术疗法的比较;或不同运动或运动方案之间的比较。 数据收集与分析:两位综述作者根据预先定义的纳入标准独立选择试验、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。在适当情况下,我们使用固定效应或随机效应方法汇总数据。我们选择了以下七个结局来总结现有证据:活动时疼痛(短期:≤3个月);日常疼痛(短期);活动时疼痛(长期:>3个月);日常疼痛(长期);功能能力(短期);功能能力(长期);以及恢复情况(长期)。 主要结果:本综述共纳入31项异质性试验,包括1690名患有髌股疼痛的参与者。研究间在患者特征(如活动水平)、纳入研究的诊断标准(如症状的最短持续时间)和运动疗法方面存在相当大的差异。八项试验存在选择偏倚的高风险,其中六项为半随机试验。我们评估大多数试验存在实施偏倚和检测偏倚的高风险,这是由于缺乏盲法所致。纳入的研究(其中一些研究贡献了不止一项比较)为以下比较提供了证据:运动疗法与对照(10项试验);运动疗法与其他保守干预措施(如贴扎;八项评估不同干预措施的试验);以及不同运动或运动方案。后一组包括:监督下运动与家庭运动(两项试验);闭链运动(KC)与开链运动(四项试验);闭链运动的变体(两项进行不同比较的试验);其他类型闭链运动或其他杂项运动的其他比较(五项评估不同干预措施的试验);髋部和膝部运动与膝部运动(七项试验);髋部运动与膝部运动(两项研究);以及高强度与低强度运动(一项研究)。没有试验测试运动媒介(陆地与水上)或运动持续时间。在可行的情况下,所有比较的七个主要结局中每个结局的证据质量都非常低,这通常是由于设计存在严重缺陷和参与者数量较少所致。这意味着我们对这些估计值非常不确定。此处总结了两项最大比较的证据。运动疗法与对照。五项研究(375名参与者)关于活动时疼痛(短期)的汇总数据支持运动疗法:平均差(MD)-1.46,95%置信区间(CI)-2.39至-0.54。该置信区间包括了1.3(0至10分制)的最小临床重要差异(MCID),表明疼痛在临床上有显著减轻的可能性。同样的发现适用于日常疼痛(短期;两项研究,41名参与者)、活动时疼痛(长期;两项研究,180名参与者)和日常疼痛(长期;一项研究,94名参与者)。七项研究(483名参与者)关于功能能力(短期)的汇总数据也支持运动疗法;标准化平均差(SMD)1.10,95%CI 0.58至1.63。以前膝疼痛评分(AKPS;0至100)表示,该结果(估计平均差高12.21,95%CI高6.44至18.09)包括了10.0的MCID,表明功能在临床上有显著改善的可能性。同样的发现适用于功能能力(长期;三项研究,274名参与者)。汇总数据(两项研究,166名参与者)表明,基于对照组每1000人中250人的“恢复”情况,由于运动疗法,每1000人中在长期(12个月)会多88人(95%CI少2人至多210人)恢复。髋部加膝部运动与膝部运动。三项研究(104名参与者)关于活动时疼痛(短期)的汇总数据支持髋部和膝部运动:MD -2.20,95%CI -3.80至-0.60;该置信区间包括了临床上的重要效应。同样适用于日常疼痛(短期;两项研究,46名参与者)。一项研究(49名参与者)发现髋部和膝部运动在活动时疼痛(长期)方面有临床上的显著减轻。尽管倾向于支持髋部和膝部运动,但功能能力(短期;四项研究,174名参与者;和长期;两项研究,78名参与者)和恢复情况(一项研究,29名参与者)的证据并未表明哪种方法更优。 作者结论:本综述发现证据质量非常低但具有一致性,即针对PFPS的运动疗法可能会使疼痛在临床上显著减轻、功能能力得到改善,并促进长期恢复。然而,没有足够的证据来确定运动疗法的最佳形式,并且尚不清楚该结果是否适用于所有PFPS患者。有一些质量非常低的证据表明,髋部加膝部运动在减轻疼痛方面可能比单纯膝部运动更有效。有必要进行进一步的随机试验,但为了优化研究工作并开展为实践提供信息所需的大型多中心随机试验,在此之前应进行旨在确定优先问题并就诊断标准和结局测量达成共识(并在可行时实现标准化)的研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-1-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-12-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-2-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-12-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-10-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-9-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025-8-11
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025-4-29
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025-5-20