Suppr超能文献

有与无糖尿病前期的青年的神经认知情况

Neurocognition in youth with versus without prediabetes.

作者信息

Quillian Jade, Attuquayefio Tuki, Sung Justin, Canna Antonietta, Ko Tiffany, Davis Xue, Maciejewski Kaitlin, Li Fangyong, Santoro Nicola, Pierpont Bridget, Kullmann Stephanie, Preissl Hubert, Morys Filip, Dagher Alain, Caprio Sonia, Small Dana M

出版信息

medRxiv. 2025 Jun 23:2025.06.23.25330130. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.23.25330130.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes has a well-established link to cognitive impairment in older adults; however, studies often do not control for adiposity and co-morbid conditions which might mediate this cognitive impairment. To overcome these limitations, we investigated the relation between prediabetes and cognition in youth with overweight/obesity while controlling for adiposity in a cross-sectional ancillary study to the Pathogenesis of Youth Onset Diabetes (PYOD) study. We reasoned that if glucose control directly impacts brain health, then cognitive function should be worse in youth with versus without prediabetes. We also predicted that this effect should be greater on tasks that depend on dopaminergic function, such as working memory and that it may be related to central insulin sensitivity.

METHODS

We evaluated 69 youth with overweight/obesity for anthropomorphic and metabolic measures, abdominal adiposity, comprehensive cognitive testing, and the effects of intranasal insulin on cognition, resting state brain activity, and functional connectivity. Oral glucose tolerance tests classified 22 participants as having prediabetes (preT2D+) and 44 participants as having normal glucose control (preT2D-).

RESULTS

Groups did not differ in age, sex, race, diet, or adiposity measures. IQ was significantly lower (p=0.032) in the preT2D+ group compared to the preT2D-group. The preT2D+ group performed worse than the preT2D-group in tasks of working memory (p<.0.001), reaction time (p=0.01), and visuospatial processing (p=0.02). After considering IQ as a model covariate, only spatial working memory showed a significant difference between groups (p=0.002). Insulin sensitivity across the entire sample was negatively correlated with processing speed in two tasks (reaction time index: p=0.022; and trail making test A: p=0.022) and with the sensitivity of the intraparietal sulcus to intranasal insulin administration. Administration of intranasal insulin showed no effect on cognition within or between groups. However, the extent to which intranasal insulin administration influenced caudate functional connectivity with the right intraparietal sulcus (p =0.018) and bilateral medial precuneus (p =0.03) was correlated with performance on the spatial working memory task.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: We find evidence for the presence of global cognitive impairment in youth with prediabetes that cannot be accounted for by adiposity, as well as a specific deficit in spatial working memory that is not attributable to global cognitive impairment. We identified associations between central insulin sensitivity and both cognition and peripheral insulin sensitivity; however, central insulin sensitivity did not appear to account for the effect of prediabetes on cognition. These findings show that the association between peripheral glucose intolerance and cognition exists early in the course of the disease, prior to the onset of significant comorbid conditions and independently of adiposity. It also suggests the involvement of both generalized and specific mechanisms contributing to cognitive change.

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT

Type 2 diabetes and prediabetes have been associated with an increased risk of dementia and cognitive impairment on dopaminergic tasksThe mechanism of this cognitive impairment and if it is dissociable from adiposity or comorbid conditions related to old age is unknownIt is unclear whether youth with prediabetes are at risk for cognitive impairment from impaired insulin sensitivity/glucose regulation Do youth with prediabetes show cognitive impairment independent of adiposity, and is this related to insulin sensitivity of dopaminergic systems? Youth with prediabetes show global cognitive impairment, as well as particular impairment of spatial working memory, independent of adiposityInsulin sensitivity of caudate functional connectivity with right intraparietal sulcus and bilateral precuneus is correlated with prior performance on a spatial working memory task These findings provide evidence that suggests that youth with prediabetes are at risk for cognitive impairment, indicating early detection and treatment of impaired insulin sensitivity is crucial.

摘要

目的/假设:2型糖尿病与老年人认知障碍之间的关联已得到充分证实;然而,研究往往未对肥胖和可能介导这种认知障碍的合并症进行控制。为克服这些局限性,在青年发病型糖尿病发病机制(PYOD)研究的横断面辅助研究中,我们在控制肥胖的同时,调查了超重/肥胖青年中糖尿病前期与认知之间的关系。我们推断,如果血糖控制直接影响大脑健康,那么有糖尿病前期的青年与没有糖尿病前期的青年相比,认知功能应该更差。我们还预测,这种影响在依赖多巴胺能功能的任务(如工作记忆)上应该更大,并且可能与中枢胰岛素敏感性有关。

方法

我们评估了69名超重/肥胖青年的人体测量和代谢指标、腹部肥胖情况、综合认知测试,以及鼻内胰岛素对认知、静息态脑活动和功能连接的影响。口服葡萄糖耐量试验将22名参与者分类为患有糖尿病前期(preT2D+),44名参与者分类为血糖控制正常(preT2D-)。

结果

两组在年龄、性别、种族、饮食或肥胖指标方面无差异。与preT2D-组相比,preT2D+组的智商显著更低(p=0.032)。在工作记忆任务(p<0.001)、反应时间(p=0.01)和视觉空间处理(p=0.02)方面,preT2D+组的表现比preT2D-组更差。将智商作为模型协变量考虑后,只有空间工作记忆在两组之间显示出显著差异(p=0.002)。整个样本中的胰岛素敏感性与两项任务的处理速度呈负相关(反应时间指数:p=0.022;连线测验A:p=0.022),并且与顶内沟对鼻内胰岛素给药的敏感性相关。鼻内胰岛素给药对组内或组间的认知均无影响。然而,鼻内胰岛素给药影响尾状核与右侧顶内沟(p =0.018)和双侧内侧楔前叶(p =0.03)功能连接的程度与空间工作记忆任务的表现相关。

结论/解读:我们发现有证据表明,患有糖尿病前期的青年存在整体认知障碍,且无法用肥胖来解释,同时还存在空间工作记忆方面的特定缺陷,这并非由整体认知障碍所致。我们确定了中枢胰岛素敏感性与认知和外周胰岛素敏感性之间的关联;然而,中枢胰岛素敏感性似乎无法解释糖尿病前期对认知的影响。这些发现表明,外周葡萄糖不耐受与认知之间的关联在疾病过程早期就已存在,早于显著合并症的发生,且独立于肥胖。这也提示了导致认知变化的普遍机制和特定机制都参与其中。

研究背景

2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期与痴呆风险增加以及多巴胺能任务上的认知障碍有关。这种认知障碍的机制以及它是否与肥胖或与老年相关的合并症可区分尚不清楚。尚不清楚患有糖尿病前期的青年是否因胰岛素敏感性/葡萄糖调节受损而有认知障碍风险。患有糖尿病前期的青年是否表现出独立于肥胖的认知障碍,以及这是否与多巴胺能系统的胰岛素敏感性有关?患有糖尿病前期的青年表现出整体认知障碍,以及空间工作记忆的特定障碍,且独立于肥胖。尾状核与右侧顶内沟和双侧楔前叶功能连接的胰岛素敏感性与之前空间工作记忆任务的表现相关。这些发现提供了证据,表明患有糖尿病前期的青年有认知障碍风险,提示早期检测和治疗胰岛素敏感性受损至关重要。

相似文献

1
Neurocognition in youth with versus without prediabetes.
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 23:2025.06.23.25330130. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.23.25330130.
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验