Uribe Gabriel, Fica Alberto, Teneb Esteban, Oñat Mario, Galvez Luis, Toro Nelson, Muñoz Daniel
Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Servicio de Medicina, Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile.
Rev Med Chil. 2025 Jul;153(7):492-504. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872025000700492.
Meropenem, linezolid, and quinolones are alternatives for managing tuberculosis (TB) in cases of drug-related adverse reactions, critical ill patients, organ failure, or inability to use the oral route.
To report the experience with the combined use of these compounds in cases of TB not associated with drug-resistant tuberculosis.
Observational study of patients hospitalized for TB between 2020 and 2024 treated with these compounds at a regional hospital in Chile.
Ten male patients (median age 43.5 years), were treated with this combination either by adverse drug reactions (4 cases), hepatitis- liver failure (3 cases), respiratory failure, suspected gastrointestinal bleeding or a critical condition (1 each one). Combination therapy was used during the initial intensive (9 cases) or continuation phase (1 case). Median meropenem doses was 3 g/day for 2 weeks, 1,200 mg/day of linezolid for 2 weeks, and 750 mg/day of levofloxacin in 7 cases for 3 weeks or moxifloxacin (400 mg/day). Five patients were admitted to critical intensive care units. In 2 cases with a prolonged alternative treatment (≥ 4 weeks), M. tuberculosis culture became negative. Anemia secondary to linezolid was observed in 6 cases, one requiring transfusion. Linezolid and meropenem therapeutic drug monitoring was applied in one case. WHO treatment outcome was classified as treatment success in 4 cases, dead in 4 (3 treated on a premortem basis), abandonment in one, and one still under treatment.
The combined use of meropenem, linezolid, and quinolones may be a viable option for managing hospitalized TB patients with contraindications to standard oral treatment and may contribute to microbiological control and patient recovery. In some cases, it represents a desperate measure and may be associated with hematological adverse effects.
美罗培南、利奈唑胺和喹诺酮类药物是在药物相关不良反应、危重症患者、器官衰竭或无法采用口服途径的情况下用于治疗结核病(TB)的替代药物。
报告在非耐多药结核病病例中联合使用这些化合物的经验。
对2020年至2024年期间在智利一家地区医院住院并接受这些化合物治疗的结核病患者进行观察性研究。
10名男性患者(中位年龄43.5岁)因药物不良反应(4例)、肝炎-肝衰竭(3例)、呼吸衰竭、疑似胃肠道出血或危重症(各1例)接受了这种联合治疗。联合治疗用于初始强化期(9例)或继续期(1例)。美罗培南中位剂量为3克/天,持续2周;利奈唑胺1200毫克/天,持续2周;7例患者左氧氟沙星750毫克/天,持续3周,或莫西沙星(400毫克/天)。5名患者入住重症监护病房。在2例替代治疗时间延长(≥4周)的病例中,结核分枝杆菌培养转阴。6例患者出现利奈唑胺继发贫血,1例需要输血。1例患者进行了利奈唑胺和美罗培南的治疗药物监测。世界卫生组织的治疗结果分类为:4例治疗成功,4例死亡(3例为临终前治疗),1例放弃治疗,1例仍在治疗中。
美罗培南、利奈唑胺和喹诺酮类药物联合使用可能是治疗有标准口服治疗禁忌的住院结核病患者的可行选择,可能有助于微生物学控制和患者康复。在某些情况下,这是一种孤注一掷的措施,可能会伴有血液学不良反应。