Zheng Thomas M, Ilboudo Yann, Lu Tianyuan, Butler-Laporte Guillaume, Nakanishi Tomoko, Morrison David, Adra Darin, Cuddeback Lena, Richards J Brent
Quantitative Life Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec H3A 1B9, Canada.
Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec H3T 1E1, Canada.
J Proteome Res. 2025 Aug 1;24(8):3774-3782. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00956. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
COVID-19 led to a disruption in nearly all aspects of society, yet these impacts were not the same across populations. During the pandemic, it became apparent that ancestry was associated with COVID-19 severity and morbidity. This study examines the differential circulating protein levels between three continental ancestries in response to severe COVID-19 infection. 4979 circulating proteins from 1272 samples were measured using the SomaScan platform. We used a linear mixed model to assess the ancestry-specific association between protein levels and severe COVID-19 illness. Comparing ancestries, we found that 62% of the tested proteins are associated with severe COVID-19 infectionin European-ancestry individuals, compared to 45% and 22% of the tested proteins between COVID-19-infected and control individuals in people of African and East Asian ancestry, respectively, likely reflecting differences in sample sizes. We found that all ancestries had strong correlations between each other with individuals of European and African ancestry having the most similar response and European and East Asian ancestries having the least similar. However, we did find 39 unique proteins that responded differently (FDR <0.05) between the three ancestries. These proteins could be investigated to assess whether they explain the differences in observed severity of COVID-19 between ancestral populations.
新冠疫情导致社会几乎所有方面都受到干扰,但这些影响在不同人群中并不相同。在疫情期间,很明显血统与新冠病毒感染的严重程度和发病率有关。本研究调查了三个大陆血统人群在感染重症新冠病毒后循环蛋白水平的差异。使用SomaScan平台对1272份样本中的4979种循环蛋白进行了检测。我们使用线性混合模型来评估蛋白水平与重症新冠病毒感染之间的血统特异性关联。比较不同血统后发现,如果将欧洲血统个体作为参照,62%的被测蛋白与重症新冠病毒感染有关,而在非洲血统和东亚血统的新冠病毒感染者与对照个体之间,这一比例分别为45%和22%,这可能反映了样本量的差异。我们发现,所有血统之间都有很强的相关性——欧洲血统和非洲血统个体的反应最为相似,欧洲血统和东亚血统个体的反应最不相似。不过,我们确实发现有39种独特的蛋白在三个血统之间的反应存在差异(错误发现率<0.05)。可以对这些蛋白进行研究,以评估它们是否能够解释不同血统人群中观察到的新冠病毒感染严重程度差异。