Rayanakorn Ajaree, Dilokthornsakul Piyameth, Pongnikorn Donsuk, Ong Jason J, Tieosapjaroen Warittha
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Center for Medical and Health Technology Assessment (CM-HTA), Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Sep;143:104913. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104913. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV. However, engaging people who use drugs (PWUDs) in PrEP services remains challenging due to societal, legal, and structural barriers. This study examined preferences for PrEP services among people who use drugs in Thailand.
We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) using a self-administered paper-based questionnaire from March to August 2024 at Thanyarak Chiang Mai Hospital. PWUDs were identified through hospital records. Random Parameters Logit (RPL) models were used to explore the drivers of PrEP use. RPL models with interactions examined heterogeneity in preferences for PrEP, and Latent Class Models identified subgroups with similar preferences for PrEP.
Among 210 respondents, 87 % were male and had a mean age of 33 (±8.5) years. Cost was the most important attribute, followed by location, the friendliness of service providers, the types of PrEP and privacy. PWUDs expressed less preference with PrEP services offered at Key Population Led Health Services (KPLHS), services exclusively catering to PWUDs, with no significant preferences for other locations, interactions with unempathetic or inattentive staff, and services costing 200 THB (US$ 5.6) or 500 THB (US$ 14.1) per month. Compared to their counterparts, those unaware of PrEP were more likely to access the service through TelePrEP, while females preferred accessing PrEP through Key Population Led Health Services. Latent class model revealed that 29 % of respondents tended to favor TelePrEP, while the majority (71 %) were less likely to use PrEP services through Key Population Led Health Services or services provided by unfriendly staff.
Diverse PrEP provisions considering service location, the friendliness of service providers, and free access could improve PrEP uptake among people who use drugs. Developing innovative service delivery models that address group-specific preferences is essential.
暴露前预防(PrEP)在预防艾滋病毒方面有效。然而,由于社会、法律和结构障碍,让吸毒者参与PrEP服务仍然具有挑战性。本研究调查了泰国吸毒者对PrEP服务的偏好。
2024年3月至8月,我们在清迈塔纳拉克医院使用纸质自填问卷进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE)。通过医院记录识别吸毒者。使用随机参数逻辑(RPL)模型来探索PrEP使用的驱动因素。具有交互作用的RPL模型检验了PrEP偏好的异质性,潜在类别模型识别出对PrEP有相似偏好的亚组。
在210名受访者中,87%为男性,平均年龄为33(±8.5)岁。成本是最重要的属性,其次是地点、服务提供者的友好程度、PrEP类型和隐私。吸毒者对关键人群主导的健康服务(KPLHS)提供的PrEP服务不太感兴趣,KPLHS是专门为吸毒者提供的服务,对其他地点、与缺乏同情心或注意力不集中的工作人员互动以及每月费用为200泰铢(5.6美元)或500泰铢(14.1美元)的服务没有明显偏好。与同龄人相比,那些不了解PrEP的人更有可能通过远程PrEP获得服务,而女性更喜欢通过关键人群主导的健康服务获得PrEP。潜在类别模型显示,29%的受访者倾向于支持远程PrEP,而大多数(71%)不太可能通过关键人群主导的健康服务或不友好工作人员提供的服务使用PrEP服务。
考虑服务地点、服务提供者的友好程度和免费获取的多样化PrEP提供方式可以提高吸毒者对PrEP的接受度。开发能够满足特定群体偏好的创新服务提供模式至关重要。