Marques Inês P, Almeida Ana C, Futterknecht Stefan, Hatz Katja, Cunha-Vaz José, Scholl Hendrik P N, Lobo Conceição, Silva Rufino, Murta Joaquim N, Anders Philipp, Anders Lisa-Marie, Santos Ana Rita, Pfau Maximilian
AIBILI, Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, Coimbra, Portugal.
Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ophthalmic Res. 2025;68(1):389-399. doi: 10.1159/000546990. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
This study investigated microperimetry-derived retinal sensitivity and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based macular morphologic data in eyes with early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The respective metrics were compared between macular subfields and their associations were determined. Detailed knowledge of functional associations with morphology is an asset to future therapeutic trial design.
This is a cross-sectional analysis of microperimetry and spectral-domain OCT baseline data. OCT data were segmented automatically within the HEYEX software (Heidelberg Engineering). Data were assessed for Gaussian normal distribution by the D'Agostino and Pearson tests, and appropriate comparison tests were performed for parametric and nonparametric data. The association of retinal sensitivity metrics with OCT morphologic data was tested with mixed-effects models.
In total, 19 eyes of 19 participants (75 ± 6.4 years) with early and intermediate AMD were included in the analysis. Both in mesopic (p < 0.05) and in scotopic red (p < 0.001) microperimetry, retinal sensitivities differed significantly between macular subfields in ANOVA. Nasal and temporal subfields showed the highest retinal sensitivities, also compared to the central subfield. Generally, subfields within the 1 mm-2 mm diameter ring showed higher retinal sensitivities than subfields within the 2 mm-3 mm diameter ring. Superior subfields demonstrated higher retinal sensitivity than inferior subfields in mesopic microperimetry. RPE thickness was mostly negatively associated with retinal sensitivity, which was pronounced in the ETDRS inner ring inferior subfield and for mesopic retinal sensitivity (t value, p value: -3.7, <0.01). In the center position, inner retinal thickness was negatively associated with mesopic retinal sensitivity (t value, p value: -2.2, <0.05).
Retinal layer thicknesses and their associations with retinal sensitivity show localized differences between macular subfields in early and intermediated AMD. An analysis including more subjects is necessary to confirm these trends. This knowledge is of importance since therapeutic trial design requires detailed morphologic but also functional conception in order to detect therapeutic effects and pass regulatory hurdles.
本研究调查了早期和中期年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者眼内微视野检查得出的视网膜敏感度以及基于光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的黄斑形态学数据。比较了黄斑各子区域的相应指标,并确定了它们之间的关联。了解功能与形态之间的详细关联有助于未来治疗试验的设计。
这是一项对微视野检查和光谱域OCT基线数据的横断面分析。OCT数据在HEYEX软件(海德堡工程公司)内自动分割。通过D'Agostino和Pearson检验评估数据是否呈高斯正态分布,并对参数数据和非参数数据进行适当的比较检验。使用混合效应模型测试视网膜敏感度指标与OCT形态学数据之间的关联。
分析共纳入19名参与者(75±6.4岁)的19只患有早期和中期AMD的眼睛。在中视(p<0.05)和暗视红光(p<0.001)微视野检查中,方差分析显示黄斑各子区域之间的视网膜敏感度存在显著差异。鼻侧和颞侧子区域的视网膜敏感度最高,与中央子区域相比也是如此。一般来说,直径1mm-2mm环内的子区域比直径2mm-3mm环内的子区域具有更高的视网膜敏感度。在中视微视野检查中,上方子区域的视网膜敏感度高于下方子区域。视网膜色素上皮(RPE)厚度大多与视网膜敏感度呈负相关,在ETDRS内环下方子区域以及中视视网膜敏感度方面表现明显(t值,p值:-3.7,<0.01)。在中心位置,视网膜内层厚度与中视视网膜敏感度呈负相关(t值,p值:-2.2,<0.05)。
在早期和中期AMD中,视网膜各层厚度及其与视网膜敏感度的关联在黄斑各子区域之间存在局部差异。需要纳入更多受试者进行分析以证实这些趋势。这些知识很重要,因为治疗试验设计需要详细的形态学以及功能概念,以便检测治疗效果并通过监管关卡。