Al Fidah Md Fuad, Islam Md Ridwan, Amin Rukaeya, Nuzhat Sharika, Ahmed Tahmeed, Faruque Abu Syed Golam
Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jul 16;9(1):e003622. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003622.
The burden of diarrhoeal diseases is considerable in South Asia, as well as in sub-Saharan Africa. Its economic impact is more profound in resource-limited settings like low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this study, we aimed to estimate the direct and indirect costs reported by the caregivers of participants from seven LMICs.
The current study is a secondary analysis using data from the multicentre, Global Enteric Multicentre Study, which enrolled under-5 children. This prospective case-control study was conducted in seven sites, all of which were in LMICs. After adjustment for inflation, cost data were collected from the caregivers and converted into international dollar (I$). Quantile regression models were developed after adjusting for age, sex and country.
This study analysed data from 4592 participants. The median (IQR) total direct cost (TDC) and total indirect cost (TIC) were I$8.4 (I$11.0) and I$10.2 (I$14.3), respectively. Statistically significant differences were found across continents for multiple variables. The highest median TDC and TIC were in Bangladesh (I$13.6 and I$23.2, respectively), while mozambique reported the lowest (I$0.4 and I$4.9, respectively), with medication accounting for 60.9% of TDC. Quantile regression analysis showed TDC was positively associated with factors like family size, urban residence, moderate-to-severe disease, caregiver education and use of rehydration methods, while treated drinking water and overweight status were negatively associated. TIC was significantly associated with seeking prior care.
The indirect cost of diarrhoea was higher, which indicates the impact of lost productivity due to the disease. Bolstering the healthcare financing systems, ensuring affordable medication using pricing regulation, subsidising treatment packages, promoting the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) initiative, promoting and practising standard case management, and timely healthcare-seeking can reduce the economic burden.
腹泻病在南亚以及撒哈拉以南非洲地区负担沉重。在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)等资源有限的环境中,其经济影响更为深远。在本研究中,我们旨在估算来自七个LMICs的参与者的照料者报告的直接和间接成本。
本研究是一项二次分析,使用了来自多中心全球肠道多中心研究的数据,该研究纳入了5岁以下儿童。这项前瞻性病例对照研究在七个地点进行,所有地点均位于LMICs。在对通货膨胀进行调整后,从照料者处收集成本数据并转换为国际美元(I$)。在对年龄、性别和国家进行调整后建立了分位数回归模型。
本研究分析了4592名参与者的数据。直接成本中位数(IQR)和间接成本中位数分别为8.4美元(11.0美元)和10.2美元(14.3美元)。多个变量在各大洲之间存在统计学上的显著差异。直接成本中位数和间接成本中位数最高的是孟加拉国(分别为13.6美元和23.2美元),而莫桑比克报告的最低(分别为0.4美元和4.9美元),药物占直接成本的60.9%。分位数回归分析表明,直接成本与家庭规模、城市居住、中重度疾病、照料者教育程度和补液方法的使用等因素呈正相关,而经处理的饮用水和超重状态呈负相关。间接成本与寻求过先前护理显著相关。
腹泻的间接成本更高,这表明该疾病导致的生产力损失的影响。加强医疗融资系统、通过定价监管确保药物可负担、补贴治疗套餐、推广水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)倡议、推广和实施标准病例管理以及及时就医可以减轻经济负担。