McKibben Lauren A, Iyer Meghna, Zhao Ying, Florea Roxana, Kuhl-Chimera Sophia, Deliwala Ishani, Pan Yue, Branham Erica M, Géranton Sandrine M, McLean Samuel A, Linnstaedt Sarah D
Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Institute for Trauma Recovery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03451-y.
Unfortunately, survivors of traumatic stress exposure (TSE) frequently develop adverse posttraumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae (APNS) such as chronic pain and stress/depressive symptoms. Increasing evidence indicates that there is a 'window of opportunity' following TSE in which therapeutic interventions are most effective against APNS, yet mechanisms accounting for this observation are poorly understood. Here, we aimed to better understand such mechanisms by generating snapshots of the transcriptional landscape in the early aftermath of TSE across tissues and time. Adult rats were exposed to a TSE model, single prolonged stress (SPS). Then, eight tissues (hypothalamus, left and right hippocampus, amygdala, dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord, heart, and muscle) were isolated from these animals at 2, 24, and 72 h after SPS and in unexposed controls (n = 6 per group). mRNA expression from deep sequencing was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs), biological pathways enriched over time, and predicted upstream regulators. In all tissues except the amygdala, the highest number of DEGs was observed 2-h post-SPS, but DEGs were detected at all timepoints and in all tissues. Some transcripts were differentially expressed in a consistent manner across multiple tissues at a time point (e.g. Fkbp5, 2 h post-SPS), while others had tissue- or region-specific expression patterns. Stress system pathways were most represented at 2 h post-SPS, then stress/circadian/inflammatory pathways at 24 h, and inflammatory pathways at 72 h. Together these findings provide insights into post-TSE transcriptional landscape dynamics and suggest specific intervention windows of opportunity. Future validation is needed across sex, age, stressor, and cell type.
不幸的是,创伤性应激暴露(TSE)的幸存者经常会出现不良的创伤后神经精神后遗症(APNS),如慢性疼痛和应激/抑郁症状。越来越多的证据表明,TSE后存在一个“机会窗口”,在此期间治疗干预对APNS最为有效,但对此现象的机制却知之甚少。在这里,我们旨在通过生成TSE后早期跨组织和时间的转录图谱快照,更好地理解这些机制。成年大鼠暴露于TSE模型——单次长时间应激(SPS)。然后,在SPS后2、24和72小时,从这些动物中分离出八个组织(下丘脑、左右海马体、杏仁核、背根神经节、脊髓、心脏和肌肉),并与未暴露的对照组(每组n = 6)进行比较。利用深度测序的mRNA表达来鉴定差异表达基因(DEG)、随时间富集的生物途径以及预测的上游调节因子。除杏仁核外,在所有组织中,SPS后2小时观察到的DEG数量最多,但在所有时间点和所有组织中均检测到了DEG。一些转录本在一个时间点上在多个组织中以一致的方式差异表达(例如,SPS后2小时的Fkbp5),而其他转录本具有组织或区域特异性的表达模式。应激系统途径在SPS后2小时最为突出,然后在24小时是应激/昼夜节律/炎症途径,在72小时是炎症途径。这些发现共同为TSE后的转录图谱动态提供了见解,并提示了特定的干预机会窗口。未来需要在性别、年龄、应激源和细胞类型方面进行验证。