Lange Lara M, Fang Zih-Hua, Makarious Mary B, Kuznetsov Nicole, Atterling Brolin Kajsa, Ballard Shannon, Bardien Soraya, Doquenia Maria Leila, Heutink Peter, Houlden Henry, Iwaki Hirotaka, Jasaityte Simona, Jones Lietsel, Junker Johanna, Kaiyrzhanov Rauan, Koretsky Mathew J, Kumar Kishore R, Leonard Hampton L, Levine Kristin S, Lim Shen-Yang, Mencacci Niccoló E, Mohamed Wael M Y, Nalls Mike A, Noyce Alastair J, Ojha Rajeev, Okubadejo Njideka U, Rehman Shoaib Ur, Screven Laurel, Shashkin Chingiz, Sopromadze Sophia, Stafford Eleanor J, Tan Ai Huey, Tan Manuela, Tavadyan Zaruhi, Trinh Joanne, Tserensodnom Bayasgalan, Valente Enza Maria, Vitale Dan, Zharkinbekova Nazira, Lohmann Katja, Bandres-Ciga Sara, Blauwendraat Cornelis, Singleton Andrew, Morris Huw R, Klein Christine
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 11:2025.07.08.25330815. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.08.25330815.
The genetic architecture of Parkinson's disease (PD) varies considerably across ancestries, yet most genetic studies have focused on individuals of European descent, limiting our insights into the genetic architecture of PD at a global scale.
We conducted a large-scale, multi-ancestry investigation of causal and risk variants in PD-related genes. Using genetic datasets from the Global Parkinson's Genetics Program, we analyzed sequencing and genotyping data from 69,881 individuals, including 41,139 affected and 28,742 unaffected, from eleven different ancestries, including ∼30% of individuals from non-European ancestries.
Our findings revealed shared and ancestry-specific patterns in the prevalence and spectrum of PD-associated variants. Overall, ∼2% of affected individuals carried a causative variant, with substantial variations across ancestries ranging from <0·5% in African, African-admixed, and Central Asian to >10% in Middle Eastern and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestries. Including disease-associated and risk variants raised the yield to ∼12.5%, largely driven by , except in East Asians, where risk variants dominated. variants were most frequent globally, albeit with substantial differences in frequencies and variant spectra. While variants were identified across all ancestries, frequencies ranged from 3·4% in Middle Eastern to 51·7% in African ancestry. Similarly, variants showed ancestry-specific enrichment, with G2019S most frequently seen in Middle Eastern and Ashkenazi Jewish, and risk variants predominating in East Asians. However, clinical trials targeting proteins encoded by these genes are primarily based in Europe and North America.
This large-scale, multi-ancestry assessment offers crucial insights into the population-specific genetic architecture of PD. It underscores the critical need for increased diversity in PD genetic research to improve diagnostic accuracy, enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms across populations, and ensure the equitable development and application of emerging precision therapies.
Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP) Global Parkinson's Genetics Program (GP2).
Genetic discoveries have drastically advanced our understanding of Parkinson's disease (PD), including the identification of rare monogenic causes and common risk variants. However, according to our PubMed-based ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ ) literature review, the majority of genetic data has been generated in PD cohorts of European ancestry. The sample sets of two recent comprehensive, large-scale genetic screening studies, the PD GENEration North America and the Rostock International Parkinson's disease (ROPAD) study, comprised 85% and 96% of White participants, respectively. Moreover, a global survey of monogenic PD, published in 2023, reported that 91% of genetically confirmed individuals with PD were of European ancestry, underscoring the major gap in ancestral representation in PD genetics research. Although ancestry-specific variants and founder effects have been reported for select PD-associated genes such as , , and , comprehensive, globally- and ancestry-representative studies are missing, thereby constraining the applicability of genetic diagnostics and the development and inclusivity of equitable, ancestry-informed therapeutic strategies. This study, conducted within the framework of the Global Parkinson's Genetics Program (GP2), represents the largest multi-ancestry exploratory genetic investigation of PD to date, including nearly 70,000 individuals from around the world, with more than 20,000 participants of non-European ancestry (representing ∼30% of the study cohort). By exploring the genetic landscape of pathogenic variants in established PD-linked genes and PD risk-associated variants across 11 diverse genetically defined ancestry groups, it provides crucial insights into the global genetic landscape of PD. This work highlights both shared and ancestry-specific contributions and emphasizes the need to consider genetic diversity in research and clinical practice. Our findings highlight the importance of as a globally relevant genetic contributor to PD risk, with variant carriers identified across all investigated populations, reinforcing it as a relevant therapeutic target across ancestries. Similarly, variant carriers, currently already targeted in clinical trials, and individuals with alterations, increasingly being explored as a therapeutic target in preclinical studies, were identified across multiple ancestral groups. However, overall, investigating variants in known PD-linked genes resulted in substantially different yields across ancestries, underscoring the limited applicability of current PD gene and variant panels across ancestries and suggesting yet unexplored population-specific variations, especially in currently underrepresented populations, where newly identified variants in established PD-genes often remain of uncertain significance due to limited sample size and reference data. As precision medicine approaches are increasingly integrated into PD research and clinical trials, it is critical to ensure that emerging therapies are applicable and accessible to individuals of all ancestral backgrounds. Current trials targeting gene variant carriers predominantly enroll participants of European or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, raising concerns about equity and efficacy in a global multi-ancestry context. This study underscores the importance of globally inclusive genetic efforts like GP2 to close these existing gaps, improve diagnostic equity, and enable more representative and effective implementation of precision neurology worldwide.
帕金森病(PD)的遗传结构在不同血统之间差异很大,但大多数基因研究都集中在欧洲血统的个体上,这限制了我们在全球范围内对PD遗传结构的深入了解。
我们对PD相关基因中的因果和风险变异进行了大规模的多血统研究。利用全球帕金森遗传学项目的基因数据集,我们分析了来自11个不同血统的69881人的测序和基因分型数据,其中包括41139名患者和28742名未受影响者,非欧洲血统的个体约占30%。
我们的研究结果揭示了PD相关变异的患病率和谱图中的共同模式和血统特异性模式。总体而言,约2%的受影响个体携带致病变异,不同血统之间存在显著差异,从非洲、非洲裔混血和中亚血统的<0.5%到中东和阿什肯纳兹犹太血统的>10%。包括疾病相关和风险变异在内,检出率提高到约12.5%,主要由[具体基因]驱动,但东亚地区除外,那里风险变异占主导。[具体基因]变异在全球最为常见,尽管频率和变异谱存在很大差异。虽然在所有血统中都鉴定出了[具体基因]变异,但其频率范围从中东血统的3.4%到非洲血统的51.7%。同样,[具体基因]变异表现出特定血统的富集,G2019S在中东和阿什肯纳兹犹太血统中最常见,而风险变异在东亚人中占主导。然而,针对这些基因编码蛋白的临床试验主要在欧洲和北美进行。
这项大规模的多血统评估为PD的群体特异性遗传结构提供了关键见解。它强调了在PD基因研究中增加多样性的迫切需求,以提高诊断准确性,增进我们对不同人群疾病机制的理解,并确保新兴精准疗法的公平开发和应用。
帕金森病全球科学联盟(ASAP)全球帕金森遗传学项目(GP2)。
基因发现极大地推进了我们对帕金森病(PD)的理解, 包括罕见单基因病因和常见风险变异的识别。然而,根据我们基于PubMed(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)的文献综述,大多数基因数据是在欧洲血统的PD队列中产生的。最近两项全面的大规模基因筛查研究,即北美PD基因研究和罗斯托克国际帕金森病(ROPAD)研究,其样本集分别包含85%和96%的白人参与者。此外,2023年发表的一项全球单基因PD调查报道,91%经基因确诊的PD患者为欧洲血统,这凸显了PD基因研究中祖先代表性的重大差距。尽管已报道了某些与PD相关基因(如[具体基因]、[具体基因]和[具体基因])的特定血统变异和奠基者效应,但缺乏全面的、具有全球和血统代表性的研究,从而限制了基因诊断的适用性以及公平的、基于血统的治疗策略的开发和包容性。 这项在全球帕金森遗传学项目(GP2)框架内进行的研究,是迄今为止最大规模的PD多血统探索性基因研究,包括来自世界各地的近70000人,其中超过20000名非欧洲血统参与者(约占研究队列的30%)。通过探索11个不同基因定义的血统群体中已确定的PD相关基因中的致病变异和PD风险相关变异的基因格局,它为PD的全球基因格局提供了关键见解。这项工作突出了共同贡献和特定血统贡献,并强调了在研究和临床实践中考虑基因多样性。我们的研究结果强调了[具体基因]作为全球相关的PD风险遗传贡献者的重要性,在所有调查人群中都鉴定出了该变异携带者,强化了其作为跨血统相关治疗靶点的地位。同样,在多个祖先群体中都鉴定出了[具体基因]变异携带者(目前已成为临床试验的靶点)和[具体基因]改变的个体(越来越多地在临床前研究中作为治疗靶点进行探索)。然而,总体而言,研究已知PD相关基因中的变异在不同血统中的检出率差异很大,这凸显了当前PD基因和变异检测板在不同血统中的适用性有限,并表明存在尚未探索的群体特异性变异,特别是在目前代表性不足的群体中,由于样本量和参考数据有限,已确定的PD基因中的新鉴定变异的意义往往不确定。随着精准医学方法越来越多地融入PD研究和临床试验,确保新兴疗法适用于所有祖先背景的个体并使其能够获得至关重要。目前针对基因变异携带者的试验主要招募欧洲或阿什肯纳兹犹太血统的参与者,这引发了对全球多血统背景下公平性和疗效的担忧。这项研究强调了像GP2这样的全球包容性基因研究的重要性,以弥合这些现有差距,提高诊断公平性,并在全球范围内实现更具代表性和有效的精准神经病学实施。