• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传染病爆发引发政治不信任。

Infectious disease outbreaks drive political mistrust.

作者信息

Koren Ore, Weidmann Nils B

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Tobias Center for International Development, Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Analysis, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405.

Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Konstanz, Konstanz 78457, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 22;122(29):e2506093122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2506093122. Epub 2025 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2506093122
PMID:40674429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12304936/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has renewed attention to the far-reaching social implications of emerging infectious diseases, an issue with historical parallels in the transformative effects of the Black Plague and Spanish Flu. However, the potential for epidemics to reshape political trust and fuel instability has remained underexplored. This study leverages a novel dataset on zoonotic disease outbreaks-including Ebola, Marburg, H1N1, and the Black Plague-and geolocated Afrobarometer survey data from dozens of African states to investigate whether exposure to these deadly outbreaks alters public confidence in political institutions. Estimating the average-treatment-effect-in-the-treated with coarsened exact matching, we find that individuals with an infectious disease outbreak experience significant declines in trust toward the political establishment, especially the president, parliament, and ruling party (reductions of 0.2, 0.18, and 0.22 points, respectively, on a four-point scale). These findings, consistent across various spatial and temporal windows, provide robust empirical evidence that deadly infectious disease outbreaks can exacerbate political polarization and undermine political stability. The study emphasizes the critical need for policy strategies that integrate public health preparedness with efforts to preserve and rebuild institutional trust during outbreaks.

摘要

新冠疫情再次引发了人们对新发传染病深远社会影响的关注,这一问题在黑死病和西班牙流感的变革性影响方面有着历史的相似之处。然而,疫情重塑政治信任并加剧不稳定的可能性仍未得到充分探索。本研究利用了一个关于人畜共患病疫情的新数据集——包括埃博拉、马尔堡、H1N1和黑死病——以及来自数十个非洲国家的地理定位的非洲晴雨表调查数据,以调查接触这些致命疫情是否会改变公众对政治机构的信心。通过使用粗化精确匹配估计处理组中的平均处理效应,我们发现有传染病疫情经历的个人对政治体制,特别是总统、议会和执政党的信任显著下降(在四分制量表上分别下降0.2、0.18和0.22分)。这些在不同时空窗口都一致的发现,提供了有力的实证证据,证明致命传染病疫情会加剧政治两极分化并破坏政治稳定。该研究强调了政策策略的迫切需求,即在疫情期间将公共卫生准备与维护和重建机构信任的努力结合起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5f3/12304936/8f7bb7e7d4d2/pnas.2506093122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5f3/12304936/8f7bb7e7d4d2/pnas.2506093122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5f3/12304936/8f7bb7e7d4d2/pnas.2506093122fig01.jpg

相似文献

1
Infectious disease outbreaks drive political mistrust.传染病爆发引发政治不信任。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 22;122(29):e2506093122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2506093122. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
2
From institutional trust to digital literacy: Socioeconomic and political determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Czech adults based on a national panel survey.从机构信任到数字素养:基于全国性面板调查的捷克成年人对新冠疫苗犹豫态度的社会经济和政治决定因素
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2533639. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2533639. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
3
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
4
Effects of city design on transport mode choice and exposure to health risks during and after a crisis: a retrospective observational analysis.危机期间及之后城市设计对交通方式选择和健康风险暴露的影响:一项回顾性观察分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jun;9(6):e467-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00088-9.
5
Political construction of risk perception and preventive behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Korea.韩国新冠疫情期间风险认知与预防行为的政治建构
J Glob Health. 2025 Jul 4;15:04189. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04189.
6
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Geosocial Media's Early Warning Capabilities Across US County-Level Political Clusters: Observational Study.地理社交网络在美国县级政治集群中的早期预警能力:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jan 30;5:e58539. doi: 10.2196/58539.
8
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
9
Public Health Messaging on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study.新冠疫情期间推特上的公共卫生信息:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e63910. doi: 10.2196/63910.
10
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
(Re)Emerging disease and conflict risk in Africa, 1997-2019.(再)现性疾病与非洲冲突风险,1997-2019 年。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Aug;8(8):1506-1513. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01929-1. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. elusive consensus: 极化的精英沟通在新冠大流行中
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717. eCollection 2020 Jul.